What does being a marine have to do with anything???
Checked baggage typically are scanned by CT X-ray and are better at discovering dense and unknown objects as they create 3D pictures. However Li-ion batteries are just as dangerous now as before.How would this increase safety?
You can more easily manipulate the device if you have easier access to it..
I assume that someone with military credentials understands threat assessment.What does being a marine have to do with anything???
What does being a marine have to do with anything???
There is a real world out there, alot of snowflakes, sheep etc.. don't understand the dangers and experience that a OIF, OEF US Veteran would have. While Americans are worrying about their lattes and their iPhone 8, people are trying to kill you everyday.
View attachment 692954 Simply a discriminatory measure. Next up is "don't buy at arabs" signs, cause it'll make the country safer.Or at least maybe you'll have to wear a sign that you're a Muslim.
Checked baggage typically are scanned by CT X-ray and are better at discovering dense and unknown objects as they create 3D pictures. However Li-ion batteries are just as dangerous now as before.
No, CT X-ray is not used for cabin baggage at any airport so far. And that is also one reason larger electronics are scanned separately. [/QUOTE]They do seem to do all that stuff in Dubai International Airport, though.
I get the rationale behind security screening. I know that bombs have been hidden in shoes and underwear before and thus the need to remove shoes and for millimeter wave scanners. But this seems arbitrary to me. The threat of laptop based bombs has been known for a long time. I remember having to turn on my laptop (to prove it was a working device) in the security lines over a decade ago. Also, I've transited IST several times in the past few years (can't speak for the other airports). Security is tighter than in the US. There are multiple layers of screening, including at the gate before you board. I know they had an attack at the airport a while ago, but that was outside the secure zone. So in the absence of any specific threat (which DHS has not said is the case), I fail to see how this helps anyone.Then if something happens they complain that the government didn't do enough to protect them, as it happened after 9/11.
Most people don't realize that if you succeed one million times in stopping a threat - as it happens every day - no one will say thanks, and most won't even know that it happened. If you don't succeed once, everyone will want your head on a spike.
No, CT X-ray is not used for cabin baggage at any airport so far. And that is also one reason larger electronics are scanned separately.
Because CT creates a 3D view, the system can see it from different angles. Sometimes you may have noticed that your hand luggage are sent several times through the x-ray, and it is because it only see in 2D.So what's the thing they use for carry on and how is a CT scanner any better at detecting explosives within an aluminium macbook, for example?
I get the rationale behind security screening. I know that bombs have been hidden in shoes and underwear before and thus the need to remove shoes and for millimeter wave scanners. But this seems arbitrary to me. The threat of laptop based bombs has been known for a long time. I remember having to turn on my laptop (to prove it was a working device) in the security lines over a decade ago. Also, I've transited IST several times in the past few years (can't speak for the other airports). Security is tighter than in the US. There are multiple layers of screening, including at the gate before you board. I know they had an attack at the airport a while ago, but that was outside the secure zone. So in the absence of any specific threat (which DHS has not said is the case), I fail to see how this helps anyone.
Thanks President Trump for keeping us safe, everyone still has a pre-911 mindset. They're people in does countries that one to kill us, and liberals want them in here because of their guilt. Laptop batteries are turning into bombs, and just because you want to be PC you don't care if a bomb goes off here or there. Your hatred for our President and reality is suicidal. Not "ALL" muslims want to kill Americans, but there is a "SMALL" percentage that do, and that's just enough to harm us in the homeland for the second time.
You can more easily manipulate the device if you have easier access to it..
Thanks President Trump for keeping us safe, everyone still has a pre-911 mindset. They're people in does countries that one to kill us, and liberals want them in here because of their guilt. Laptop batteries are turning into bombs, and just because you want to be PC you don't care if a bomb goes off here or there. Your hatred for our President and reality is suicidal. Not "ALL" muslims want to kill Americans, but there is a "SMALL" percentage that do, and that's just enough to harm us in the homeland for the second time.
Didn't know American marines are that dumb. What a stupid comment he made. I thought they were one of the bests....As a Marine, please explain how having these bomb-packed devices in the cargo hold makes anyone safer.
Hahahaha. Are you really a serving marine? Really? I feel sorry for the great American soldiers whose precious lives will depend on your "quick and logical thinking" and "intellect" one day.Thanks President Trump for keeping us safe, everyone still has a pre-911 mindset. They're people in does countries that one to kill us, and liberals want them in here because of their guilt. Laptop batteries are turning into bombs, and just because you want to be PC you don't care if a bomb goes off here or there. Your hatred for our President and reality is suicidal. Not "ALL" muslims want to kill Americans, but there is a "SMALL" percentage that do, and that's just enough to harm us in the homeland for the second time.
2 questions:
1. If they're worried about security from those airports, then what them think they will reliably enforce this ban? To enforce the threat of stopping flights from those destinations, then US airports will have to screen every passenger's carry-on-baggage on arrival. Do US airports have that infrastructure?
2. If there is a theoretical 'bad person' in one of those destinations, who was planning on carrying a 'bad thing' inside electronics to the US, would they not now book an indirect flight, say via CDG, FRA, LHR, AMS, etc? Thus avoiding the restriction?
"This is your captain speaking! I have some good news and bad news. The good news is that apparently we avoided a bomb loaded on our aircraft. But the bad news is, if you see between rows 20-25 there are smoke. One of the laptops in the hold have catched fire, and we are unable to put it out."Read carefully.
Neither you nor marine0816 have an explanation how laptops and tablets in checked baggage makes a plane more secure. marine0816 clumsily tried with: "You can more easily manipulate the device if you have easier access to it." That's cartoon logic. Correct me if I'm wrong, but a bunch of laptop and tablet batteries in a condensed and confined space poses a greater threat than laptops and tablets spread haphazardly throughout the cabin... unless, you know, every laptop and tablet was a bomb (shout out to bad TV plots), then all bets are off. But seriously, I find it hard to defend the logic that this is somehow safer. Even from a standpoint of accident prevention, gathering a bunch of Li-ion batteries together is stupid and reckless.Read carefully. The article says that DHS agents have intelligence about this, and decided to create an "emergency amendment." In other words, there is a specific situation they have to look into.
You are right in saying that there are many precautions already, but don't forget that many bombs were planted/let pass thanks to the help of technicians or security agents. Somalia and Egyptair are the first two that come to mind. I think that the Pan Am 103 was a similar case in which the terrorists posed as security agents (and the bomb was in a cassette recorder). I'd rather err on the side of caution for a bit if DHS fears that this might be the case.
Not using an e-reader for a few hours is certainly less troubling than seeing the nose of the plane blow and spend the last three minutes of your life screaming in fear (unless you're lucky and the bomb is strong enough to cause a total destruction)
I guess they must "think" airport security in these countries is inept and will let anything pass them.