If this passes, Apple should advise users strongly against side loading and make clear in their sales contracts/user agreements that Apple won’t troubleshoot or provide support for any software issues potentially or possibly caused by malware or side loaded apps, where Apple has sole discretion to determine when that is the case with no legal recourse. Basically any problem not hardware related has no warranty if Apple determines it could be related to a side loaded app. Apple should also make clear that users side loading apps may and are likely to have their data used in ways that are not permitted by the App Store. Also side loaded apps should be heavily restricted and not able to draw on many iOS services, such as creating calendar entries, reading contacts, etc.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
U.S. Bills Allowing Sideloading Would Cause Consumers to Be Hit With 'Malware, Ransomware, and Scams,' Says Apple
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
As far as I know, none of my banks issue physical access tokens anymore. I asked and they told me they didn't (don't live in America)
Sure, you can physically go to the bank (if it's not closed due to a Covid issue), but can you see the problem? I can't even access online banking without an smartphone
Edit: Speaking about going to the bank, during the height of the pandemic, I had to visit an specific branch. You had to make an appointment first to avoid having many people inside. You know how they took the appointment? A Whatsapp bot. Wasn't glad but I had to use it but there seemed to be no alternative.
What I worry is Apple buying enough politicians to destroy this new bill in its infancy. That’s more horrifying than whatever bs Apple keeps spitting out here. iPadOS is so horrible sideloading might inspire Apple to make it much better.
Talk about fundamentally misunderstanding the situation.
No one is trying to make Apple host content they don't want to host. The point of this legislation is to allow for side loading, or allowing you to install content from outside the app store - just like you have the ability to do with your computer.
Even better, stop providing software support of any shape or form whatsoever, and provide software as-is without any warranty, including paid software. That’ll save a huge chunk of support cost.
Right and wasn’t iOS supposed to be an improvement over general purpose PCs? iPhones and iPads are far less problematic than pcs including macs for non-technical users. Also macs have minimal market penetration so not a big target like the iPhone. It is naive to think nothing will be lost in terms of security and ease of use by turning iOS into windows or android.
Who will you and others blame when the your/their iPhone goes to hell?
I would not call that feature “working” when only app I can run are released long before High Sierra era and no longer being updated. Yes you can lol, good to run an app released back in 2016 that was never updated since.
You dont have a computer? Weak argument.
And what about the free and open workd of macOS? Does macOS have relentless malware and ransomware attacks? It's not like you need to be a genius to see that it doesn't.... or maybe you do. ?♂️
And has been stated numerous times over and over and over again whenever the subject of sideloading and an alternative app store to Apple's comes up, if you don't feel comfortable using an app store not operated by Apple, you're free not to. You will not be forced to do so.
Do you understand what that means?
I don't have malware on Windows. Doesn't mean there isn't a malware problem on Windows.
Yes. Did you read anything? I can't use my online banking with just a computer because they only issue access tokens via the bank's app
It's good to hear that Tim Cook is forced to play Defense !
Tim, get used to it, it's the New Norm for you
Tim, get used to it, it's the New Norm for you
Apple has nobody but themselves to blame if any of these bills become law. I agree that these laws would be harmful to customers, but that doesn’t seem to do much to dissuade Apple from the greedy and uncompetitive practices that invite this kind of legislation. Stop making the App Store a profit center and these problems would disappear.
come on, guys. lets not kid ourselves. you guys are financially invested in apple so that you want people to be forced into buying from the app store. the app store does not take 30% revenue to maintain. it never has and never will. there is no harm TO YOU for allowing customers to have THE OPTION to download on alternative stores. you guys can stop pretending like malware and scams will affect you. you just don't like it because you're selfish.
There is a good chance I'm missing something here,but don't the console companies do something similar as far as a game needing approval from the machine manufacturer? Of course distribution of games is more open.
Report: macOS malware boomed in 2020, but still a fraction of Windows threats - 9to5Mac
A study looking at new malware found in the wild during 2020 says that threats developed for macOS saw a...
9to5mac.com
macOS is not as large as Windows. I guarantee you that if macOS and Windows flipped, macOS would be a malware riddled mess like Windows is.
That's what I was thinking.
Android has had sideloading and multiple app stores since the beginning, right?
But I can't recall anyone making a big deal out of it. Everything ends up in the official Google Play store anyway.
Epic pulled Fortnite from Google Play and had people install it from the web. Freedom! But they eventually came crawling back to the Play Store.
Epic had one of the most popular games in history. But even they couldn't get people to sideload it. Would smaller apps or games fair any better? Probably not.
So while I'm not thrilled about governments forcing Apple to allow sideloading or alternative app stores... I'm also not convinced that it will even matter.
If Apple can sandbox the environment so rogue apps can't steal your contacts and other personal info... it might be OK.
But I'm still not thrilled about it.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
If you don’t like Apple’s profit margin then create your own hardware and software and set your own profit margin.
Apple isn’t a charity.
Who gets to decide the percentage? Is 20% too much? What about 10%? What are the reasons? Why is 30% too much? Why not complain to Steam, PlayStation and Xbox and other stores that take 30%?
Are we really at a point where we cannot allow a business to price their own products? Should Apple be allowed to sell their laptops for the price they do?
But that’s disingenuous at best and BS at worst.
A lot of malware has been found in the past infecting apps published on the Play Store.
Google’s lax policy on app review are to blame, not the fact they allow sideloading.
As to how many people with Android phones actually sideload its impossible to know, but keep in mind Epic Games has failed to convince people to sideload in order to install Fortnite, one of the most popular games around.
It is because Apple doesn't offer side-loading. Once Apple does, and Epic tries again, it will be far more common for it to become standard on both Android and iOS. Plus, Epic will purchase exclusivities like they do on PC.