Time for a RealityCheck!
Ok guys, it is time for a reality check.
The app is specific ONLY to Orange County, California.
Although the courts are dead wrong, so far they have ruled that the DUI checkpoints are only legal if they meet very specific criteria.
1. There must be advance publicity and notice when and where the DUI checkpoints that deprive you of your civil rights will be.
2. The DUI checkpoints must visually warn drives well ahead of time via signage well visible in such a manner that a driver can elect to not go through it.
3. The DUI checkpoint must have a means for a driver to lawfully turn around without violating any vehicle code sections so they can avoid the DUI checkpoint.
In its present state as typically executed, just about every DUI checkpoint fails on all court tests.
For starters, the term DUI checkpoint was a marketing term designed to lull citizens into complacency so that when your Constitutional rights are deprived unlawfully, and deprived under color of authority, the complaint chorus would be muted. This is an identical tactic to when the treasonous California state government proposed making it illegal to talk on your cellphone while driving but the fine was claimed to be less than $20. It currently stands at about $180, a REAL moneymaking shakedown by the criminal government.
The DUI Checkpoints are not "DUI" checkpoints, they are unconstitutional suspicionless stops looking for all manners of alleged law violations.
Secondly, the locations and times are rarely published in any manner of which constitutes reasonable notification.
Thirdly, I have not yet seen a checkpoint that gives citizens the means of avoiding it as required.
Fourthly, the police unlawfully arrest citizens who exercise their lawful rights to turn around and avoid the Constitution-busting checkpoints under sham guises of evading and "illegal u-turns".
Now I think drivers so drunk should be arrested and punished just as much as the next person, but the way that should be gone about is not at the expense of citizens Constitutional rights.
But is is rather ironic that the court rulings have held that there must be sufficient, proper advance notification, but when a iPhone app comes out that seeks to do just what the court required, treasonous, Civil rights busting thugs like Democrat party Harry Reid tries to pressure Apple to not allow an app that complies. You think Harry Reid is demanding police departments stop directing throw-away tiny newspapers to stop providing advance notice? Think he's contacted the newspapers to silence them too?
...If thousands can ask Apple to take down an anti-gay app]/b] then why not a few officials asking them to take down an app that gives drunken dicks an advantage?...
Oh and to the homosexual agenda enforcer (a written psy-ops admitted propaganda manifesto agenda available from Amazon books that was created after a Warendon Virginia homosexual political leadership war conference in 1973) who referred to the app by Exodus International that helps those who want to leave the chosen homosexual lifestyle as an "anti-gay" app, a scripted homosexual agenda tactic they call "jamming" modeled after a Communist Chinese mind control technique called "negative associative conditioning", why not let people who want to leave the chosen lifestyle exercise their rights to seek the support they decide without you trying to bigotedly, narrow mindedley, intolerantly and hatefully trying to censor, remove and violate their civil rights to choose what help they feel is best for themselves.
