Because they were electedTwo old white men trying to be relevant with the SJW crowds.
Why are these people still in their positions?
Because they were electedTwo old white men trying to be relevant with the SJW crowds.
Why are these people still in their positions?
It is you who does not know what a monopoly is.Exactly, just because we believe it's wrong doesn't really matter. I don't agree with most speed limits, does that mean I can speed.
[doublepost=1508516896][/doublepost]
I know everyone has already said this , but you obviously don't know what a monopoly is. Name one coffee machine maker that has a monopoly. Suing someone for breaking a patent has nothing to do with a monopoly. Apple does not have a monopoly on apps, in fact they make very few, and are available on both platforms. Apple may restrict how you get an app, but that has nothing to do with a monopoly.
Apple is a corporation, not an advocacy group
Different business model != not greedy.
Google’s main revenue come from ads.
BB10 is, dead.
And Jobs stated from day 1 of the original iPhone that devs can make web apps and it won’t have any restrictions.
No monopoly here.
Apple is all for privacy and encryption and security...unless it impacts their business in China and their bottom line, then it's screw privacy, right?That sums up our government
Apple is all for privacy and encryption and security...unless it impacts their business in China and their bottom line, then it's screw privacy, right?
That sums up Apple.
I'd imagine Apple has zero control over this situation. They need to abide by different laws and regulations all over the world. I am guessing these senators expect Apple to not sell iPhones in China because of this? Or not follow the rules and be banned in the country? Not sure what business would make that decision.
this is height of hypocrisy The federal government forced Apple to unlock an iPhone in a terrorism related case. It also tried to force Apple to keep a backdoor for NSA/FBI. Apple refused.
Umm hello?? The NSA? The Snowden leaks? The Assange leaks? PRISM?
The Constitution it's a fabulous read.
The Constitution it's a fabulous read.
Unfortunately it’s mostly fiction anymore.
The Supreme Court said that corporations have the same free speech rights as a human does. Except the corporations who filed and won that lawsuit are worth billions, and the average person isn’t. But of course, elected officials listen to both sets of voices equally, and don’t let the fact that one group can raise millions directly and hundreds of millions indirectly for them and their campaign while the average voter can afford to donate maybe a couple hundred dollars toward their interests. Totally even political field. Not.
Politics has always listened to money, but with all of the “reforms” of the last 30 years it no longer needs to listen to anything else.
Google did. They gave up a 35% and growing search engine position in China back in 2010 because they didn't condone the censorship and government surveillance hacks.
No, the FBI didn't ask for a general backdoor. They asked for Apple to create an OS version that Apple could load and lock to a single phone at a time, that would let the FBI try multiple PINs without locking, under a warrant.
Also, NSA wasn't a party to the FBI's request, nor did they support it.
PRISM and most other programs were about storing information so that if needed, a court could allow them to go back and find clues that otherwise would've disappeared.
They were not about censorship or constant surveillance like China does. (Over 2 million Chinese are employed just to watch what people do on the internet there.)
Let’s just abandon it.Unfortunately it’s mostly fiction anymore.
The Supreme Court said that corporations have the same free speech rights as a human does. Except the corporations who filed and won that lawsuit are worth billions, and the average person isn’t. But of course, elected officials listen to both sets of voices equally, and don’t let the fact that one group can raise millions directly and hundreds of millions indirectly for them and their campaign while the average voter can afford to donate maybe a couple hundred dollars toward their interests. Totally even political field. Not.
Politics has always listened to money, but with all of the “reforms” of the last 30 years it no longer needs to listen to anything else.
Umm hello?? The NSA? The Snowden leaks? The Assange leaks? PRISM? US Senators (INCLUDING TED CRUZ) repealing privacy laws?
Grow a spine you gutless hacks!!
Honest question. Can you point me toward which privacy laws Ted Cruz has helped repeal? He is generally FOR individual liberties and privacy.
To sell in China Apple must abide by local rules and regulations. With the majority of Apple’s products being manufactured in China Apple does not have much of a choice. The Apple apps are also on China’s cloud server. The Chinese have Apple by both balls.Maybe Apple is being blackmailed somehow.
finally someone exposed Timmy hypocrisy
The new iPhone D is over $1K just imagine what it would cost if it were made in US factories here in America. Factor in workers comp,lawsuits,benefits,bonuses,insurance,etc.. lol. That new iPhone would be $3-4Kfinally someone exposed Timmy hypocrisy
leftist Tim pandering the communist Chinese gov and at the same constantly virtual signaling USA citizens and telling them what they must think and do and how they should behave
hating on Trump and how he "behaves" and not criticizing the Chinese gov. and actually supporting them in their censorship and human rights violator
Apple owning slave factories in china with suicide nets in them
Tim has no soul
That new iPhone would be $3-4K
There are so many regulations these days in America that Apple would need a permit for just about everything you could think of to get that phone made here. They would have a local recycling fee for probably every part made in that phone just where they charge you for water in California and then charge you a recycling fee based on the number of gallons of water used per month. They pretty much charge you for 2-3 gallons of water for every gallon used in California.That number might be true, if the price of an iPhone was 100% (Chinese) labor AND was still 100% handmade in the US.
So no parts, no development, no marketing, no distribution and off course no profits.
In reality it might add another 100$ to the price.