Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In 2027, devices will automatically block any digital drawings, paintings or 3D modelling of suspiciously-shaped fruit or vegetables.

In 2028, any unapproved angular lines or curves shall be prohibited.

In 2029, … well, I’m not allowed to say what happens then.
 
I understand the reasoning, but when my spouse and I want to share explicit photos of ourselves with each other, will our devices be scanning them and requiring Face ID each time? Or is it just a one time verification process?
I was wondering the same thing, are they sending the images to their servers for scanning or is this done on the device. I would think the UK would have more pressing issues to address than this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dabotsonline
I was wondering the same thing, are they sending the images to their servers for scanning or is this done on the device. I would think the UK would have more pressing issues to address than this.

The short story is there's a couple of think tanks who hired a university professor a while ago to write a report stating that this is one of the biggest risks in society at the moment. This goes through several layers of civil service, filled with incompetent incumbent morons, and to the politicians who just vote it in verbatim because they have little to no experience in the actual real world. There is a huge disconnect between the political classes here and the rest of the population. Of course it is enforced by the jobsworth feckwits at Ofcom who have been hiring yes-men for the last 20 years and managed to do precisely nothing of value, so this is something to latch on to do well to the destruction of us all. This is all backed up by a positive feedback loop to the universities who overlap considerably socially and politically with the people who are running this. Objectivity is gone.

I will note I worked in this space (political influence) from around 2004-2007, for which I am completely ashamed of, and it is conservative and foreign political influence which is driving this, nothing more. We have people who think that doing this is a good thing for moral virtue thus promote it and people who think it's a good thing to divide the population and stoke internal discontent so they can do their nefarious things without getting picked up in the noise.
 
I don’t think they wanted to do that. The had external and internal lobbying. They had to let it out so it’d burn in public.

If you look at the ADP situation in the UK in comparison.
Unfortunately they did want to do so in regards to internal mails because they wanted to help the children and spent enormous resources developing it before its announcement. And their great efforts to. Ale it allegedly private and no government would never change their list or Demand alternative lists.

Apple disabled ADP recently, but they released the floodgates that they could do it without privacy violations….
 
  • Like
Reactions: dabotsonline
The proposal is said to target mobile devices initially, but it could extend to desktops. The government reportedly explored making the controls mandatory for devices sold in the UK, but it has apparently decided against that approach for now.
In the future it could become illegal to prevent any government AI agent to remote desktop into your mac and access all your private data.
 
This new service brought to you by Soylent Green.

You know you can trust it because it’s made from bits of real people.

Or is that the real people bits. IDK.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dabotsonline
I’m not in favour of censorship in any form but you’d have to be completely blind to see the damage explicit internet content has done to society at large.

Violence in relationships has become normalised because it’s what young people think sex should be. The loneliness epidemic in men is the biggest cause of suicide and at its root is an addiction to porn instead of seeking healthy relationships with other consenting adults. It’s an insidious addiction because you don’t really notice the symptoms and the product is both infinite and free. Men feel ashamed about it and don’t seek help leading to spirals of self-destruction. That’s not to mention the exploitation of performers.

Putting explicit images of yourself out there into the ether of your own volition is equally as damaging for so many people and should not be encouraged. Go home and shower together instead.

Apple and Google blocking these images by default using on-device AI (which is what the current warning software uses) isn’t state surveillance and if you’re not looking at it then you’ve nothing to worry about. It would also blanket block it all for teenagers which is only a good thing.

And for the tin-hat brigade I’ll just mention that digital state ID tends to make use of Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) cryptography meaning it proves data without exposing it so it can’t be used for surveillance. You should be more worried about how much tracking large internet companies do than your own government.
 
Last edited:
The UK government is trying to build infrastructure for total surveillance and control and this "think of the children!" is their attempt to sell it through fear and moral urgency.

Sadly for a lot of people, that excuse works. When they were first pushing the Investigatory Powers Act, I argued online how it wouldn’t “protect the kids” in the slightest and was merely an excuse to intrude on everyone, I was accused of being a paedophile multiple times for being against the act. The exact same thing happened when I argued against the age verification law.
 
They won’t jail PDFs but they do care that people look at images on their phones, and it is absolutely not because they want track people who are not breaking any laws.
They do jail PDF's, but obviously the right wing media here would rather you believed they didn't so that billionaire friendly politicians will be voted in so they can pay less tax, and exploit more workers.

This and the digital collate information to be stolen by hackers, I mean digital safety act can do one.

Edit to add, do one means go away in strong terms here in the UK
 
Last edited:
Its never about the children. Read the fine print.

"build … algorithms into their software by default … verify that they're adults through biometric checks or official ID … to target mobile devices initially, but it could extend to desktops … government reportedly explored making the controls mandatory for devices …"
 
This is a textbook example of "surrender your privacy and/or freedoms in exchange for some arbitrary security" that the UK government is trying to pull here
Never fall for it. Never surrender your freedom. Security is a synonym for control and power. The rules will never apply to politicians. Like the EU chat control which excluded politicians.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.