So, now having a single speaker is a 'feature'? š§š¤£
I think the vast majority of people would be sensible to do thatI am going to wait for facts to make the scene before making a purchase decision.
If this meets my desired specs I might do my first single year upgrade and go from 16PM to 17 Air. I'd like a lighter big phone.This iPhone seems like such a conference room idea. The product of a desperate 'letās rattle out innovative ideas' brainstorm session. I mean, I could be completely off, but is anyone asking for a thin phone with a camera bump?
Yup. The Face ID and front-facing/selfie camera still need room/housing depth, since it seems like Apple hasn't redesigned them yet to be thinner.Its not just a camera bump anymore. They're using the internal space for components that won't fit in the thin body. They'll use the extra volume for a better speaker and better front facing camera.
$ 999 for a phone with all the missing features? š¤£šš¤£I hope the base iPhone 17 will start at $799, and I think it's fine if it comes with 128GB. I also hope the iPhone 17 Air will start at $999 for the 256GB model.
Well they have been actively working to get the 'Air' products to where they need to be i.e. thin and light. Macbook Air M2, they done a great job with that. Now they are making this iPhone Air which is incredibly thin. Next on the agenda is the iPad Air for sure but the iPad Pro M4 is pretty much both the Pro and Air in one device!So the iPhone Air might be just a thin luxery product (akin to the 2015 MacBook, which should have been an Air), the iPad Air is a mid range thicker product and the MacBook Air is the entry level product.
The Air branding, is all up in the air.
That's gonna be iPhone 17 Pro feature.Will new Siri work on it?
Apples tend to deform when rotten.Everything sounded reasonable until the last item. Can't imagine Apple doing an off-center usb port. Even without Jobs and Ive, that sounds like a big Apple no-go.
Poor iPhone Plus sales.What is even motivating this product?
Look how large the speakers are in the iPad Pro (itās the four circles):But if the iPad Pro can have stereo speakers, the iPhone 17 can too.
I think there are a majority of people who want a lighter large phone, and one way to achieve that with a large screen is to reduce the thickness. With greater efficiency and improved battery technology today, going thinner and lighter makes sense.I've had a lot of iPhones and never in my life have I wished any of them to be thinner. What is even motivating this product?
A thinner phone with a case will still be thinner and lighter. I think they might appreciate the thinner and lighter weight.Everyone I know puts their phone in a case to make it easier to hold and protect the screen. Those people wonāt care if itās a few millimetres thinner.
Maybe some internals are being relocated into the bump because the main body is so thin.Why does the iPhone 17 Air, with a single camera, go inside the elongated camera bump, but the regular iPhone 17, with two cameras, gets placed in no camera bump? Can someone explain that?
Finally an iPhone with a soundbar.The single speaker rumor appears to only come from one source, back from November. [ā¦] Maybe thatās what the big bar on the back is for?
The iPad Pro 13ā is thinner than the iPhone Air and fits both Face ID and front camera. So itās not clear that this would be a major impediment.Yup. The Face ID and front-facing/selfie camera still need room/housing depth, since it seems like Apple hasn't redesigned them yet to be thinner.
Maybe. Time will tell. Personally I think most people will continue to buy either the cheapest model or the model with the biggest screen.A thinner phone with a case will still be thinner and lighter. I think they might appreciate the thinner and lighter weight.
I mean, it could be worse. Technically, with call transcription you donāt strictly need a speaker.So, now having a single speaker is a 'feature'? š§š¤£