If you have the skill to jailbreak it then do it, no one is stopping physically stopping you.It’s my phone. What do you not understand?
If you have the skill to jailbreak it then do it, no one is stopping physically stopping you.It’s my phone. What do you not understand?
I have made machines before as well. I was thinking of a laptop with Linux or FreeBSD.Yes... I primarily use Fedora now on a machine I made myself. I actually went from Linux (and FreeBSD) to Mac OS X when it became a thing... now I'm going back.
My point was that many do not want a walled iOS.No, not really. iOS started off as a phone operating system. With current hardware more people are using it as a general purpose device. Apple sells iPad's now as an laptop replacement... so they are trying to compete with general purpose devices. macOS is (or its suppose to be) a general computing platform... though its being restricted more and more.
No, it’s not “simply a computer”.Why ? A phone is simply a computer, doesn't matter if it's Apple or Google or Windows or Jolla or Sony or Xbox, all these app stores SHOULD be made to allow the user to download and install software from wherever they want.
The whole 'buying in to an ecosystem' is bad for all of us, don't get me wrong, if you want to only download from the official app store - fine, but it should be mandatory that you can write your or own software or download from elsewhere, even install a new OS should you rather do that than have to dispose of your phone when it's no longer supported.
If LG did that, then I would buy another brands TV.I'm a robot, I will obey.....
In any other walk of life you know this would be absolutely ridiculous:
LG only allow me to watch approved shows on my LG TV - ridiculousFord decide where I drive my car -ridiculous.........wait until MacOS gets locked down the same way
Then buy a different product. Just because you want something doesn’t mean Apple is obligated to give it to you.My point was that many do not want a walled iOS.
The same line told gets more and more boring every time Apple and anyone else that uses it, which is 'Apple does not have a monopoly on mobile phones because they have competition from Android'. The thing is, that is not the point which is being made. The point that is being made is that Apple have a monopoly on iOS, which is true.
Nobody said Apple has a smartphone monopoly. What they are is part of a smartphone OS duopoly with Google and that makes them subject to anti-trust laws, and potentially actions based on those laws. The only people going on about how “Apple isn’t a monopoly so these laws don’t apply to them,” are those who don’t understand that anti-trust laws don’t only apply to true monopolies.No, it’s not “simply a computer”.
And it does matter who makes it because they get to decide what features they offer and support on the device they make and sell. Your choice as the consumer is to purchase a device whose features you want. You can not and should not get to dictate to them what they must do simply because it’s what you want.
If you don’t like it, don’t buy it. Apple does NOT have a smart phone monopoly. You have options.
Uh I can throw my phone in my swimming pool and leave it there. Its my device so I can do that.It's YOUR device. This would be like Ford telling you what you can and cannot put in, or on, your car. Sure, it's Ford's "platform" but......
The problem is that the prosecutors will never be able to prove it in court. US antitrust law focuses on harm done to the consumer. The owners of the Cydia platform are not Apple’s consumers.Nobody said Apple has a smartphone monopoly. What they are is part of a smartphone OS duopoly with Google and that makes them subject to anti-trust laws, and potentially actions based on those laws. The only people going on about how “Apple isn’t a monopoly so these laws don’t apply to them,” are those who don’t understand that anti-trust laws don’t only apply to true monopolies.
You’ll have trouble finding where the word monopoly is used even once.
I agree with you. People here are making the market WAY too narrow. Mobile apps is the market. Guess what? There is Android! This is like saying Costco has a monopoly on Kirkland products by only selling them at Cosco.What’s the market? Software. Phones. Apple is a small player in both these markets. Oh - you think the “market” is apps running on Apple iPhones? Well...than prepared for a future in which the Switch needs to boot PS4 and iPhone games by default. Good luck with that. Also CD players need to play 8-tracks. Or else MONOPOLY.
THANK YOU! Get a Jitterbug for a NECESSARY phone. Flip phone, with limited functionality. THIS is a NEED. An iPhone is NOT a NEED.Here in lies the problem....a phone is a vital necessity. A premium smartphone isn’t. You can get your “vital” Nokia for free with a SIM card.
People tend to confuse “nice to have” with “need to have”.
This isn’t an all you can eat buffet where you get to pick and choose aspects you want from each manufacturer and then try to force them by claiming “monopoly“ or “anti-trust” or “anti-competitive”. Being a monopoly on your own product isn’t against the law; hell, it’s expected. Being successful through having a better product/ service/ business acumen isn’t against the law and isn’t “anti-competitive”.
This is the problem with the current generation...they want everything right now, have never been told “no” and everybody gets a participation award.
They have. You now need to get notarization and Gatekeeper is enabled by default. It is getting more and more difficult to install apps that are not certified.That's not a good reason. In that case Apple should immediately lock down macOS and Macs to protect us from piracy and malware.
YES! It is an extension of the most critical piece of technology - a phone. I NEED the ability to call 911 (emergency services for those outside of the US) at ANY point. Does my Mac? And yes, sometimes computers need to be locked down MASSIVELY. Why do you think large businesses lock things down so much? I can only install approved software on my Windows system from work.And they really, really want a walled iOS? Must be two completely distinct groups in that case.
Difficult, but arbitrary for tech folks who know what they’re doing.They have. You now need to get notarization and Gatekeeper is enabled by default. It is getting more and more difficult to install apps that are not certified.
And you can jailbreak your iPhone if you read up how to do it.Difficult, but arbitrary for tech folks who know what they’re doing.
The entire point of Apple’s legendary ease of use for REGULAR people, is that they shouldn’t have to think about the intricacies of running a computer. Everything basic that 90% of people do is just taken care of. If you’re the more technical amongst us, you KNOW what you can do.
I don’t see the problem here. But I understand that as an IT person that macOS is incredibly complex and powerful like most OS’s these days, but it’s geared towards user-friendliness first and foremost. That focus is a legitimate part of their strategy.
And people bring up the Duopoly many times. It is not Apple's fault there is not a third phone maker in the US. Apple is not buying them out or preventing anyone from becoming a real competitor to Android or iPhone. I do NOT agree that we need to punish Google or Apple because nobody can create a competitor.Apple doesn't single-handedly dictate anything. If they want to act like a monopoly just because they have 60% US market share, or even 99%, they'll lose the rest of the world, and Google will get it for free. It is a duopoly, though.
And this is why such arguments make no sense when you make the market too narrow.The same line told gets more and more boring every time Apple and anyone else that uses it, which is 'Apple does not have a monopoly on mobile phones because they have competition from Android'. The thing is, that is not the point which is being made. The point that is being made is that Apple have a monopoly on iOS, which is true.
And who's fault is that? You have a choice, you could have gotten a Samsung Galaxy Tab instead of that iPad. So just return the iPad and get an Android device with the freedom to install whatever you want.They are the only option for anyone who bought an iPad or iPhone, and is now pretty much locked into an ecosystem (also apple's intention).
How dare they not allow Cydia and its ability to install pirated software!
for shame!
And forcing Apple to change (essentially punishing them because a third party has not developed yet) is a very VERY bad move. Don't like iPhone being locked down? There is a CLEAR alternative, Android. Which allows pretty much the same Apps (nearly all the important ones). So this makes any arguments moot. Cydia can be on Android and make their money there.Nobody said Apple has a smartphone monopoly. What they are is part of a smartphone OS duopoly with Google and that makes them subject to anti-trust laws, and potentially actions based on those laws. The only people going on about how “Apple isn’t a monopoly so these laws don’t apply to them,” are those who don’t understand that anti-trust laws don’t only apply to true monopolies.
You’ll have trouble finding where the word monopoly is used even once.
Do people even still JailBreak? It's 2020, no need to do it anymore.
Oh yeah I loved using Cydia and having a barely usable phone it was so great