Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Don't forget Harmony OS ... it WILL be a massive market.
I had to look that up because I've never heard of it, which tells you exactly how relevant it is. It looks unlikely to be popular outside of China and we're talking about US laws here. It also doesn't change the state of play today since it won't even be on Huawei's phones until next year.
 
If anybody has a dominant position in the tablet/phone market it is Google who - like MS - don't just use the Google App suite* on their own phones but license it to virtually all phone manufacturers not called "Apple".
Google app suite is a different subject. On Android you can side load apps. That is not possible on iOS without a jailbreak or Xcode workaround.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naraxus
I don't see Apple as a culprit here. When you buy an iPhone, Apple does not claim that this device is able to install other OS's or App Store. If you wish so you can buy a an Oppo or Huawei. Once you buy the iPhone and you can make it run other App Stores or OS's then you are free to do so, Apple won't sue you. At least I never seen them take action against that.

IIRC when selling VHS you had to pay JVC(inventor), and Sony(inventor) if you want to sell on Bluray, Nintendo if you want to sell on their console, I don't see how this is different.

If its monopoly they talk about there is no monopoly as many Android phones exists, many app stores over there, Nokia-like phones exists, and other OSs like Sailfish, LineageOS, KaiOS, GrapheneOS....its not Apple's fault that they just happen to be the best OS out there.
 
My MBA has Apple Wallet, and nearly all of the same data on it that my iPhone does. Granted, my MBA doesn't travel around with me everything like the phone does.

The security aspect of the argument IMO doesn't hold water, because companies like Facebook have snuck in approved apps that datamine like crazy. Sure they might get caught by Apple at some point, but just the fact that they can sneak stuff by Apple all all negates the so called security aspect.
It's just security theater.
 
wait till apple hears what users can do on macOS. they should really lock it down to just App Store-only apps to reduce piracy.

They would love to but are afraid of the lash back. The problem with installing from the App Store is not only gives Apple a 30% cut but also because it limits what the software can do according to their rules. For example I heard TextExpander can't be on Mac App Store because Apple limits its capabilities over there.

If MacOS was released for the first time today I am sure they will limit where you can get your software just like on iOS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naraxus
I don’t care about Cydia, but Apple’s argument of not having monopoly because there is Android is rubbish. 20 years ago they happily joined in pointing at Microsoft for making Internet Explorer the default browser on Windows , buhu the internet monopoly. And yes, that did ruin Netscape, and as a developer I am very happy that despite this Mozilla rose from the ashes.
And back then Microsoft got forced to provide alternatives right at system start up, even though anybody could have chosen other browsers later, and now people are clever enough to do so. But even then they could have gone over to Mac or Linux, just as Apple now says with that Android argument.
Apple has a large platform and they do the utmost to milk it, just as Microsoft did back then, though admittedly the “shield the customer from harm” is the better legal argument. But monopoly it is.
 
Doesn’t matter. Anti-trust law is extremely explicit. You cannot prevent competitors from your own market, IF you have substantial marketshare.
:D

According to Cydia, if Apple did not have an "illegal monopoly" over iOS app distribution, users would be able to choose "how and where to locate and obtain iOS apps," and developers would also have alternate distribution methods.
using this logic, Emulation companies could sue Microsoft and Sony for not allowing their stores to run emulated nintendo games on Xbox and Sony.
 
If the power management systems have been bypassed and battery is somehow compromised by unknown modifications to the OS, you think Apple should cover it?

Hell, having a third party dash-cam installed voids the warranty on some cars.
And how is an app going to bypass the power management systems? This is about opening up app delivery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zchrykng
That is incorrect.
They tell you what quality of fuel, not what brand.
They cannot void a warranty for putting in a part that is like and kind. They can only void the warranty for modifications after they prove the modification caused the problem (At least here in the US).
So no, you do not have to use Ford sold part in your Ford car. mind you most of the stuff, Ford doesn't even make. That's another story. But neither does BMW, etc.
They also must provide diagnostics through the OBD-II port that meets an open standard.
Their software to run the car is proprietary just like any other software platform.
What's incorrect? You just restated what I said.
Some of these even have parallels to Apple products. Standard interfaces, sanctioned third-party parts, and voided warranties.
 
Then nothing to be concerned about with alternative stores then? Of course, if they offered cheaper software, folks would be all over it like a rash [that's why Amazon is a wash with cheap knock-off iPhone accessories - folks want them] This is the only reason Apple lock everything to their App Store. If everyone is supposedly purposely choosing Apple for the walled-garden, privacy and security, then they wouldn't be interested in alternative stores? Of course we all know 99% of folks do not pick an iPhone for those reasons.
Nobody looks at the iPhone and says, I want that cause it limits what I can do. They look at it and say, it just works and is well-supported instead of involving the kind of nonsense you deal with on Android. But that's because Apple walls it.

More importantly, they don't tell Apple how to design their phones, other than voting with their wallets. If the government stepped in, it'd be unnecessary, and they'd screw things up like they always do with technology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strongy and deevey
I don’t care about Cydia, but Apple’s argument of not having monopoly because there is Android is rubbish. 20 years ago they happily joined in pointing at Microsoft for making Internet Explorer the default browser on Windows , buhu the internet monopoly. And yes, that did ruin Netscape, and as a developer I am very happy that despite this Mozilla rose from the ashes.
And back then Microsoft got forced to provide alternatives right at system start up, even though anybody could have chosen other browsers later, and now people are clever enough to do so. But even then they could have gone over to Mac or Linux, just as Apple now says with that Android argument.
Apple has a large platform and they do the utmost to milk it, just as Microsoft did back then, though admittedly the “shield the customer from harm” is the better legal argument. But monopoly it is.
Funny how monopolists change their behavior once they are a monopoly.
 
Yes, they are. I am hoping the regulators stop this behavior both on iOS and macOS.
If they did I might actually buy another mac... I've left (though I still use it on occasion). Still use iPhone, but I haven't updated since iPhone X, used to update yearly.... Apple's policies has sort of made me try moving everything out of their ecosystem.
 
"Apple also must maintain control over the way software is installed on the ‌iPhone‌ to prevent customers from accidentally downloading viruses and malware, which iPhones would be more susceptible to with a third-party ‌App Store‌."

There's the one argument that kills Cydia's claim.
By that logic, macOS must be an absolute scourge of malware and viruses, since it is not locked to the Mac App Store.
 
Nobody looks at the iPhone and says, I want that cause it limits what I can do. They look at it and say, it just works instead of having the kind of nonsense you deal with on Android. But that's because Apple walls it.

More importantly, they don't tell Apple how to design their phones, other than voting with their wallets. If the government stepped in, it'd be unnecessary, and they'd screw things up like they always do with technology.
So why does Apple not wall macOS?
 
I don't see Apple as a culprit here. When you buy an iPhone, Apple does not claim that this device is able to install other OS's or App Store. If you wish so you can buy a an Oppo or Huawei. Once you buy the iPhone and you can make it run other App Stores or OS's then you are free to do so, Apple won't sue you. At least I never seen them take action against that.

IIRC when selling VHS you had to pay JVC(inventor), and Sony(inventor) if you want to sell on Bluray, Nintendo if you want to sell on their console, I don't see how this is different.

If its monopoly they talk about there is no monopoly as many Android phones exists, many app stores over there, Nokia-like phones exists, and other OSs like Sailfish, LineageOS, KaiOS, GrapheneOS....its not Apple's fault that they just happen to be the best OS out there.
The existence of other OS's, whose combined use rates amount to a rounding error, doesn't mean that Apple and Google don't exist as a duopoly in the smartphone OS marketplace. In fact, Apple has over 50% market share on that front.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naraxus
They should file the lawsuit in... the Eastern District of Texas. Or maybe in Pyongyang or Moscow. Where they really have a chance for sympathetic Apple-hating judges to rule on their side. And will be awarded $490 billion from Apple. :rolleyes:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.