Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don't have the Pro, just the base 17 (so no ProRaw).

I've been experimenting with the new settings, coming from the iPhone 11.

If I shoot HEIC 48MP, all the photos look brighter than those taken in the default 24MP. I don't understand why that's the case. I've read some stuff from Apple about pixel binning and bayer sensor/filters leading to better dynamic range on the 24MP shots, but why does that darken them?

(As I don't have a telephoto lens, I tend to crop more than you Pro users would, so 48MP can be useful. )
 
On my second unit now. After a dozen image comparisons with my 15PM and the experience I had with the first 17Pro, here are my findings. First the good things:
- The yellow tint is reduced by a lot. I'm totally puzzled as to how two identical phones, with the same software can process the same image in such drastically different ways. My new 17Pro still has a warmer white balance than my 15PM, but not to a degree that makes me vomit (as was the case with the first 17Pro I had)
- The blurriness is much better and nowhere near the level of the first 17Pro. Some of it can really be attributed to the aggressive noise reduction and reduced sharpening. While the latter is fine, they really need to dial back on their attitude towards noise.
- Generally speaking, the 15PM 5x lens appears to be sharper than the 17Pro 4x. Not only from a image processing POV, but also the lens setup itself. I dont mind it much tbh. If more sharpness is necessary, then this can be slightly tweaked afterwards. And the 4x with the 17 Pro doesnt leave such a huge gap in image quality after the 1x. So, although I loved the compression with the 5x, I think this is a reasonable choice.
- I made all comparisons in the 12MP mode. The 17Pro is more aggressive when it comes to noise, but in difficult lighting conditions, the larger sensor on the 4x really shows and yields lower noise levels throughout. So, while the 5x on the 15PM really fell apart quickly when lighting wasn't optimal, the 4x on the 17Pro is more forgiving.
Now the bad stuff:
- My 17Pro unit makes a weird mechanical and clearly noticeable clicking noise when the camera app is opened. I haven't experienced this on either my 15PM or the first 17Pro. There is another thread here on macrumors. It's really weird. I hope this will not result in a hardware issue down the road. But since I have apple care+ and the image quality doesn't seem to be affected, I will stick to this unit for now.
- I think @BlackrazorNZ has mentioned this somewhere else, but every now and then, the processing pipeline makes some really weird choices. For instance, I had one picture in medium lighting conditions, where the 17Pro used double the ISO and half the exposure time, resulting in a significantly worse image when compared to the 15PM. Taking the same image again resolved this issue, but it shows that Apple still has a lot of optimisation to do.

In summary, the 17Pro unit I have now is less affected by the blurriness as before, but still not perfect. As mentioned earlier, part of it comes down to less sharpening and heavy noise reduction. But I think the lens (on the 4x especiially) is just less sharp, too.
I still dislike the very warm white balance Apple opts for. It might be flattering for skin tones, but I would have preferred a more neutral white balance, and the warmer processing should have been left to the photographic styles.
I almost see no difference in the 1x when compared to my 15PM. Sometimes the 17Pro misses a shot because it makes totally weird choices regarding ISO and shutter speed (especially in difficult lighting conditions). This needs to be fixed via software!
The 4x is less sharp than the 5x, but it bridges the gap to the 1x much better and yields images with less noise, due to the larger sensor. So images in less than optimal lighting conditions become much more usable.
Also, I can definitely see an improvement in the 2x, when compared to my 15PM. So this is a welcome bonus.

I was totally happy with my 15PM, but got tired of its bulkiness, especially with a case. So the smaller form factor of the 17Pro, the better low light performance on the 4x, and the improved 2x and 8x are noticeable upgrades. Is it worth 1500-2000$. I don't think so. Not for the average consumer! But since I am a tech enthusiast, paying about 1k (after trade-in) was borderline acceptable.

P.S. Apple really needs to adopt the larger sensors like the chinese manufacturers have been doing for more than a year now. There is only so much this sensor can be tweaked and optimised. They might get a pass this year, given that Google and Samsung haven't improved their sensors either, but there is no way they can use the same main sensor (which is 4 years old now) for another year.
 
Last edited:
New problems
  • Depth of field on the 1x camera is awfully shallow. I have to step away from stuff and use the telephoto a lot. This really pisses me off.
This is actually not a new problem. It's been like that since iPhone 14 Pro when they moved the main camera to 48mpx one.
It was one of the reasons why after 8 months of usage I sold my 15 Pro Max and went back to my 13 Pro Max. It was REALLY annoying.
I want to downsize and get 17 Pro but I just know I'll be annoyed all the time because of that.
 
Has anyone found ProRAW files shared by any online reviewers…? Would be very interesting to see in detail how the files look compared to my own unit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nunolikeapple
I was listening to MKBHD's Waveform podcast and one of the guest (or producers?) was having the same issue. He even suggests that the iPhone's computational photography is just trash and prefers getting a RAW in Adobe Lightroom/Halide. Skip to 54:11 timestamp in the video below.


I think the camera hardware improvements have been marginal since iPhone 11 and continue to be that way going forward unless Apple introduces a new way to take pictures altogether.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nunolikeapple
I was listening to MKBHD's Waveform podcast and one of the guest (or producers?) was having the same issue. He even suggests that the iPhone's computational photography is just trash and prefers getting a RAW in Adobe Lightroom/Halide. Skip to 54:11 timestamp in the video below.


I think the camera hardware improvements have been marginal since iPhone 11 and continue to be that way going forward unless Apple introduces a new way to take pictures altogether.
Yeah, a larger sensor with less processing would be appreciated. Although the fact that some of these images were taken on the iPhone is impressive.
 
I recently traded in my iPhone 14 pro for the 17 pro. I'd been having trouble with focusing inconsistencies with the 14 pro since I got it 2 years ago. (They even replaced the camera.) I do bird photography and that's why I wanted the supposedly amazing zoom of the 17 pro, BUT, I'm VERY disappointed with the focusing and lack of sharpness in photos and videos when zoomed in. I am very non-tech savvy at 76 and sound like my mom (long dead) but not sure about the various settings. But it's mostly, again, when I zoomed in all the way. I still have 2 weeks to return the 17 and stick with the 14. I will say that the 17 pro is doing pretty well when not zoomed in so far. Also, when I connect my iPhone 17 pro to my MBpro to upload the photos (I don't use icloud), I keep getting a message that my current MBPro software doesn't support the 17 pro and I need to update the MBPro. I've done so three times. FInally, without me doing ANYTHING, my camera in the 17pro keeps switching to selfie mode. But, my 14 pro is still not doing great focusing. so... wondering if the above issues in the 17pro might ultimately be resolved? Sorry for this long note. Thanks for any suggestions.
 
Last edited:
Are you using a tripod? If you do, or are otherwise resting the phone on something, try and reduce the ISO so that the shutter speed decreases to compensate.

What OS versions are you running on the phone and laptop? Sounds like something odd is going on if you've upgraded. However, you say you upgraded 3 times. Not sure how that's possible, so I'm wondering if you're doing something wrong.


As for the selfie camera, you must be nudging the camera change icon bottom right, or maybe a light press of the camera button is popping up the options.
 
Not sure if this is normal or not, and won't post the photos here due to privacy. However, had my 17P with me this weekend at a party in decently lit restaurant in the middle of the day, 10 people sitting at a long table (5 on each side). I stood on one end taking the photo down to the other end. No matter what I did, I could not get the faces past the first 1-2 in focus. My wife's 16 (regular, not pro) had no issue getting all faces in focus when I grabbed hers. Just found it odd... Maybe some sort of depth of field thing? No idea, but was a bit annoying...

Edit: Evidently this is a common issue and might've been an issue on the last couple of Pro's as well... just a limitation of the depth of field. I wonder if this issue would exist on the regular 17 as well? They're the same lens/sensor, no?

Edit 2 (sorry!): no, they're not... regular 17 has smaller sensor and therefore deeper DOF... probably why my wife's 16 had no issue with the image. 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:
If you were (accidentally?) using the telephoto lens and/or portrait mode turned on, then you'll get a shallow depth of field.

A real one if using the telephoto, and a fake computed one if using portrait mode. The good thing about the latter, is that when looking at the photo in Photos, you can turn portrait mode off and the fake blurred background comes back into focus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jntdroid
If you were (accidentally?) using the telephoto lens and/or portrait mode turned on, then you'll get a shallow depth of field.

A real one if using the telephoto, and a fake computed one if using portrait mode. The good thing about the latter, is that when looking at the photo in Photos, you can turn portrait mode off and the fake blurred background comes back into focus.

Definitely wasn't using the telephoto lens and also didn't have portrait on. It does give me the option of adding the portrait effect to it, but all that does is make the "background" people even more blurry rather than just looking out of focus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adrianlondon
Some additional data points: four different phones (17 Pro x2, 17 Pro Max x2), one of them had a clearly blurry camera that showed areas out of focus while the other three are normal, all on the same software (26.1 beta 2). So if anyone has this issue it may be worth comparing to Apple Store units. This is exactly the same issue I saw with 16 Pro units this past year (and the main camera system seems to be the same this year)
 
Update: I gave up and sold my two 17 PM phones. Both were unusable to my standards with the main camera.

I'm super happy with my 16 PM. I'll give it another try in a few months. Let's hope they've optimized this situation.
 
Last edited:
  • Sad
Reactions: miemo
I really hope this is just a software issue because my 16p seemed clearer and sharper than my 17p in most photos especially when zoomed in a bit. I specifically remember the first few days with my 15p were similar and blurry but after some software updates, everything was great. 16p was great out of the box though.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.