Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
reducing each flight by 80 lbs is probably less than 0.01% of the total weight including the plane, fuel, passengers, etc.

if that saves 326,000 gallons of jet fuel a year, they are still using over 3,000,000,000 gallons of jet fuel a year. the savings probably cover the cost of the ipads. if it's not greenwashing, it's at least green-meh.

It's actually less than that. But it is economies of scale. Anyone who thinks saving 326,000 gallons of fuel doesn't matter isn't very green. That's a full tank of gas for over 16,000 automobiles, from one simple savings. We actually measure fuel on the aircraft by weight, not gallons. That is equal to 2.5 million pounds of fuel. My aircraft, the MD-88, typically uses about 20,000 pounds of fuel for one flight. That savings is equal to 127 flights worth of fuel on my aircraft - simply by switching to iPads. That's nothing to you? I guess you leave your lights on at home when you are gone as well, I mean, heck, is one person leaving 6 lights on at 15 to 60 watts per bulb REALLY going to make a difference in our environment? If it isn't a savings, how 'bout we send you a bill for that 2.5 million lbs of fuel, you do have around $1,000,000 of credit available on your Visa, right?
 
I know right. Hardly a "toy" when the pilot of a commercial airliner is using an iPad to guide hundreds of passengers safely to their destination.

The iPad is also being used to control this rock quarry.

http://www.cultofmac.com/apples-ipa...ristic-next-gen-rock-quarry-case-study/108741

and in hospitals

and schools

and thousands of other businesses

I just don't get why people struggle to accept that something that has recreational uses can also have important other functionality.

Millions of PCs are used JUST for gaming and recreation, that doesn't mean ALL PCs are 'toys', in the same way yes a lot of iPads are just used for surfing, and playing and consuming media, but that doesn't mean the whole lot should be classified as 'iToys'
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

CChrisG said:
Let's see when the first plane crashes cuz the pilot was playing Angry Birds

There are Parental Flight Deck Controls.
 
As a long-time private pilot and computer professional, I like the idea but have some safety concerns, especially for commercial flights.

Safe flight is all about back-up systems. The obvious backup to an iPad would be paper charts. I hope that the airlines have the wisdom to continue carrying at least one flight bag with paper charts to use in-flight when the iPads fail. Remember Murphy's law.... it will fail.

I liked what I see EXCEPT for the GREEN GARBAGE. I am so SICK of "GREEN" that I'm avoiding anything that says "green" on the package.

I don't mind such things when consumers can make the choice but the government and certain tree-hugger groups want to force us all to do their bidding.

Recycling is a hassle and I stopped doing it. I don't like CFL compact florescent lamps. The light is too dim, is not the color I need and takes too long to turn on. I tried them and went back to instant-on incandescent lamps. I drive the largest SUV I could find because it's comfortable and we burn lights day and night so we can see. The government is forcing us to burn ethanol even though it reduces gas mileage by 8% and damages older engines. To avoid this, I burn even more gas to get there and pay extra, but have found stations that still sell gas without ethanol. It's my choice as it should be for everyone.

Let me guess

You listen to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Roger Hedgecock and relate to the Tea Party. You want to "Take our country back"

Am I right?
 
But remember, iPads are just for consuming content, not for real work!

In this case, they're still being used to consume content... for real work :)

Irony. A device the FAA claims will crash a plane if passengers use it on take off and landing will now be used by pilots to keep it in the air.

The difference is, the pilots can immediately turn their own devices off if they think they're causing a problem.

That is really cool. I think a lot of industries are going to see the benefits of tablet computing.

Pilots have been using EFBs since the 1990s. These are simply cheaper and cannot connect to aircraft systems as some EFBs can.

Oh no, I can see it now instead of pilots flying the planes they will be surfing the web & checking email.

I think most pilots learned from what happened back in 2009 on Northwest Airlines.
 
It probably makes pilots happy to have/hold/use an iPad. Perhaps even having pilots jump "ship" to try out the new system.
It isn't the sole driver of the plane. Planes have lots of electronics already aboard the plane. They too could all go out…and have.
This isn't solely about reducing fuel costs but sure it does slightly but the other idea is saving on paper and printed costs as well as getting these to the pilots. And it alleviates the pilots from lugging around big bags.

My wife's Dr uses an iPad for jotting down notes, explaining symptoms and pointing to a body chart for reference.

Good for them. Though I can see the hint of Greenwashing here I also see it as a savings device for the airline and why not use it for PR.
 
So I guess electronic devices don't really interfere with aircraft's computers..

The difference is, the pilots can immediately turn their own devices off if they think they're causing a problem.

Isn't that the whole problem? Let's say during an small emergency or computer glitch, pilot recognizes that the iPad is causing a problem, he turns it off, and then what? He no longer has paper manual to get tips from. How the hell is he going to solve the problem when his electronic manual is causing the problem.
 
This question is for anyone who REALLY uses these EFB ipads (i.e. real pilots or engineers).

When taxiing around the airport do these ipads or Boeing electronic flight bags have a capability to clip to the yoke when displaying the taxi diagrams or will one pilot call out taxiing navigation directions to the other while holding the device.

Just curious.
 
They try to get rid of 38 lbs when having a bunch of fat passengers adds way more...

It doesn't seem like 38 lbs would matter that much. Still, it's really nice to have it be electronic.
 
and in hospitals

and schools

and thousands of other businesses

I just don't get why people struggle to accept that something that has recreational uses can also have important other functionality.

Millions of PCs are used JUST for gaming and recreation, that doesn't mean ALL PCs are 'toys', in the same way yes a lot of iPads are just used for surfing, and playing and consuming media, but that doesn't mean the whole lot should be classified as 'iToys'

The children's hospital I work for (hint: the largest one in the midwest) just rolled out tablets for patients to use while in the clinics' waiting rooms. They're used to collect data about symptoms. Are they iPads? Nope. Too expensive, I guess. They are using these clunker HP tablets that are about 2 inches thick and weigh about 5 lbs. I think businesses are still trying to figure out if they are cost effective to use.

...Let's say during an small emergency or computer glitch, pilot recognizes that the iPad is causing a problem, he turns it off, and then what? He no longer has paper manual to get tips from. How the hell is he going to solve the problem when his electronic manual is causing the problem.

That's the problem. It is a proven fact that "going electronic" does not cut down on paper use, it actually increases it. Most important documents that exist electronically always have a hard copy somewhere. I really can't see pilots not having a hard copy on board, it's too contrary to being safe.
 
So I guess electronic devices don't really interfere with aircraft's computers..



Isn't that the whole problem? Let's say during an small emergency or computer glitch, pilot recognizes that the iPad is causing a problem, he turns it off, and then what? He no longer has paper manual to get tips from. How the **** is he going to solve the problem when his electronic manual is causing the problem.

I know, it doesn't interfere. In fact, there is wifi onboard. It's BS.

Also, they say portable TVs are not allowed, but they do not transmit but receive signals ALREADY IN THE AIR. :rolleyes:
 
So I guess electronic devices don't really interfere with aircraft's computers..


There is a difference between one device that has been tested and 200 random unknown devices being used in the cabin.. First off the total radiated power is about 200 times less but I bet it's the "unknown" part that is worse.
 
Dumb idea. When the iPad runs out of battery and/or dies the pilots won't be able to navigate the SIDS/STARS when on departure or arrival.

Phffbbbttt... If the pilot's iPad runs out of power, they can play Angry Bird on a passenger's iPad. Everybody and their mothers have one nowadays; except me...and my monkey.

Anyhow, I think it's a good idea. But it's better to stick with a proven system. Which reminds me of that joke where the NASA spent millions developing a pen that can write underwater, in space, upside down and so on. The Russians used a pencil.:p Keep it simple.
 
So I guess electronic devices don't really interfere with aircraft's computers..



Isn't that the whole problem? Let's say during an small emergency or computer glitch, pilot recognizes that the iPad is causing a problem, he turns it off, and then what? He no longer has paper manual to get tips from. How the hell is he going to solve the problem when his electronic manual is causing the problem.

I don't think when there is an emergency, that a pilot uses a manual to get a "tip". There might be some training involved first...
 
It's actually less than that. But it is economies of scale. Anyone who thinks saving 326,000 gallons of fuel doesn't matter isn't very green. That's a full tank of gas for over 16,000 automobiles, from one simple savings.

Yep, a penny here, a pound there, pretty soon we're talking about real money :)

And that's just from not carrying 36 pounds saved by the iPad. Makes me think they should choose one luggage bag per flight and lose it before loading, thus saving millions of gallons a year! Oh wait, that aleady happens a lot. Never mind.

Seriously, I'm interested in how they calculated the savings. Let's see:

326,000 gals / 11,000 pilots = ~30 gals per pilot per year. Then divide that by the number of flights per year to get savings per flight. Perhaps 0.1 gallon per flight?
 
I looked at this app and it appears that it does not use in-app subscriptions. Imagine for a moment if Apple was getting a cut of every single business that used subscription based apps with the iPad to reduce paper usage?

I'm just excited that the Paperless revolution is starting. I discovered iThoughts HD the other day, and that app just reduced tons of paper and separate files I used to track things into one nice graph.

Yep, a penny here, a pound there, pretty soon we're talking about real money :)

And that's just from not carrying 36 pounds saved by the iPad. Makes me think they should choose one luggage bag per flight and lose it before loading, thus saving millions of gallons a year! Oh wait, that aleady happens a lot. Never mind.

rofl
 
Last edited:
forget Angry Birds. They of course would instead be posting crazy high scores on FlightControl HD

:)
 
That's incredible, I wonder if there is anything else that can be done to reduce weight. :)

No, there's absolutely nothing else the airlines could have cut to reduce the weight of a plane by a mere 80 lbs. It just had to be the elimination of the 1200 documents pilots have to read before/during every flight in favor of iPads.
 
The valve is now FULLY open!

Charter companies, Alaska, British Airways, others said they where doing trials.

Now that United seems to simply said they WILL do this simply opens the doors for ALL airlines to jump on it.

This is a HUGE income opportunity for Apple and app makers. Easily 100,000 units needed for all the worlds airlines.

It also solidifies iPad as a business machine, and no real commpetition. Anyone who calls it iToy will be smacked down.

And it is a far cheaper solution to some of the other EFB's made.


If Apple is smart they should make a group to custom their software to better serve the industry (like the Earthquake alert built in for iOS 5 in Japan)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.