reducing each flight by 80 lbs is probably less than 0.01% of the total weight including the plane, fuel, passengers, etc.
if that saves 326,000 gallons of jet fuel a year, they are still using over 3,000,000,000 gallons of jet fuel a year. the savings probably cover the cost of the ipads. if it's not greenwashing, it's at least green-meh.
I know right. Hardly a "toy" when the pilot of a commercial airliner is using an iPad to guide hundreds of passengers safely to their destination.
The iPad is also being used to control this rock quarry.
http://www.cultofmac.com/apples-ipa...ristic-next-gen-rock-quarry-case-study/108741
CChrisG said:Let's see when the first plane crashes cuz the pilot was playing Angry Birds
As a long-time private pilot and computer professional, I like the idea but have some safety concerns, especially for commercial flights.
Safe flight is all about back-up systems. The obvious backup to an iPad would be paper charts. I hope that the airlines have the wisdom to continue carrying at least one flight bag with paper charts to use in-flight when the iPads fail. Remember Murphy's law.... it will fail.
I liked what I see EXCEPT for the GREEN GARBAGE. I am so SICK of "GREEN" that I'm avoiding anything that says "green" on the package.
I don't mind such things when consumers can make the choice but the government and certain tree-hugger groups want to force us all to do their bidding.
Recycling is a hassle and I stopped doing it. I don't like CFL compact florescent lamps. The light is too dim, is not the color I need and takes too long to turn on. I tried them and went back to instant-on incandescent lamps. I drive the largest SUV I could find because it's comfortable and we burn lights day and night so we can see. The government is forcing us to burn ethanol even though it reduces gas mileage by 8% and damages older engines. To avoid this, I burn even more gas to get there and pay extra, but have found stations that still sell gas without ethanol. It's my choice as it should be for everyone.
But remember, iPads are just for consuming content, not for real work!
Irony. A device the FAA claims will crash a plane if passengers use it on take off and landing will now be used by pilots to keep it in the air.
That is really cool. I think a lot of industries are going to see the benefits of tablet computing.
Oh no, I can see it now instead of pilots flying the planes they will be surfing the web & checking email.
The difference is, the pilots can immediately turn their own devices off if they think they're causing a problem.
That's an amazing marketing topic for apple!!!
Since you should expect the airlines to have tested the iPad very good regarding reliability
and in hospitals
and schools
and thousands of other businesses
I just don't get why people struggle to accept that something that has recreational uses can also have important other functionality.
Millions of PCs are used JUST for gaming and recreation, that doesn't mean ALL PCs are 'toys', in the same way yes a lot of iPads are just used for surfing, and playing and consuming media, but that doesn't mean the whole lot should be classified as 'iToys'
...Let's say during an small emergency or computer glitch, pilot recognizes that the iPad is causing a problem, he turns it off, and then what? He no longer has paper manual to get tips from. How the hell is he going to solve the problem when his electronic manual is causing the problem.
So I guess electronic devices don't really interfere with aircraft's computers..
Isn't that the whole problem? Let's say during an small emergency or computer glitch, pilot recognizes that the iPad is causing a problem, he turns it off, and then what? He no longer has paper manual to get tips from. How the **** is he going to solve the problem when his electronic manual is causing the problem.
So I guess electronic devices don't really interfere with aircraft's computers..
I love the idea, but certainly hope that both the pilot and co-pilot are each carrying one. Anything electronic can fail.
Dumb idea. When the iPad runs out of battery and/or dies the pilots won't be able to navigate the SIDS/STARS when on departure or arrival.
So I guess electronic devices don't really interfere with aircraft's computers..
Isn't that the whole problem? Let's say during an small emergency or computer glitch, pilot recognizes that the iPad is causing a problem, he turns it off, and then what? He no longer has paper manual to get tips from. How the hell is he going to solve the problem when his electronic manual is causing the problem.
It's actually less than that. But it is economies of scale. Anyone who thinks saving 326,000 gallons of fuel doesn't matter isn't very green. That's a full tank of gas for over 16,000 automobiles, from one simple savings.
Yep, a penny here, a pound there, pretty soon we're talking about real money
And that's just from not carrying 36 pounds saved by the iPad. Makes me think they should choose one luggage bag per flight and lose it before loading, thus saving millions of gallons a year! Oh wait, that aleady happens a lot. Never mind.
That's incredible, I wonder if there is anything else that can be done to reduce weight.![]()