Verizon, IIRC, was the first major carrier to use prioritization vs. throttling to manage times of congestion.
Here's an article from back in 2014 when they started doing it on the unlimited plans.
https://gigaom.com/2014/07/25/veriz...ds-for-its-heaviest-unlimited-plan-customers/
What's interesting to me is the LACK of people on MacRumors over the last three years bitching about the effect of Verizon's depriorization practice. Lots of threads from people complaining about how unusable their throttled connections have been, though... Once you're throttled, you're stuck at that speed 24/7 until your next billing cycle begins. With network prioritization, you're only affected during the times a tower is congested, if ever. Be interesting to see how congestion plays out, now that so many more people will have unlimited.
How many people would even have experienced DP/throttling? GUDP accounts are in the extreme minority. And for those, the DP/Throttling threshold was much higher. 100GB IIRC from some accounts on this forum. We are talking about a minority of a minority of people.
The "lack of bitching" on this forum, which is another minority of people relative to the total number of Verizon customers, really means nothing.
I am not saying throttling/DP is good/bad either way. I am just saying that there are limitations in place, whether you want to call it throttling, or something else like deprioritization. I have seen nothing solid from anyone here (or from Verizon reps) about what use is like AFTER "deprioritization". I think that remains to be seen, especially with the influx of users onto unlimited. Nor have I seen any specific regarding the algorithm that handles deprioritization/throttling. Think about it: if it worked TRULY the way Verizon describes, not only would you have to calculate network congestion for that tower, but you would have to rank each individual user, then go back and compare each user to all the other users trying to access the tower at that time. Then you would have to determine who ranks where, and then adjust the connection/speed to each individual user accordingly. All in the matter of seconds.
Again, I am not saying anything concrete, except that the only people we should be listening to regarding DP/throttling on Verizon are those that have experienced it before. With some concrete examples. The ATT user is the only guy that came close, but that was ATT. And even with Verizon users on GUDP, this new plan is different given GUDPs were not supposed to be throttled at all. This new plan has an explicit 22GB cap.
Verizon is a company that tried to convince everyone to give up their UDP. Literally, sales agents had a pitch every time you called in. If you had GUDP, they were trained to pitch why you should switch to a 4/6/10GB plan or whatever to "save money". Then they raised the prices for the remaining few who survived, trying to kick them off. Every assumption should be made AGAINST them when there is uncertainty regarding their plans. This latest act was only in response to T-mobile's competition, and losing customers to them.