75% of users put a case on their phone (and 87% of iPhone users), making this feature useless.
I am guessing that the thought process is (maybe) being able to use google assistant in situations where you can't do "ok google". A pocket is the only one I could come up with lol. But anyway, you're not wrong.Anyone remember when phones would stop a video if you looked away, or when you could take 3D video of ping pong games?
I guess I don't see how this is different than a point-based pressure actuator... you know, a button.
Exactly. How is this not useful?
You squeeze your phone to trigger the best virtual assistant on the market. I can see any number of instances where this would be the most convenient way to activate it.
I'd *hope* that they thought of that. Google even sells there first party cases for their current pixel so...75% of users put a case on their phone (and 87% of iPhone users), making this feature useless.
Reviews called Touch ID stupid? I only remember reading how impressively accurate it was.You're right, I was thinking of Touch ID for how it reviewed not Retina. No idea how I got those two mixed up.
If I were Google I'd focus on trying to put that finger print sensor underneath the glass as opposed to the back, like Apple are trying to do instead of adding gimmicks like this to their device...
6 inches... jesus christ. Are phone manufacturers really that stupid that they think everyones got banana hands?
1. Dumbest smartphone feature I've seen in a long time.
2. The first Pixel just recently hit the 1 million sold mark. This is not an iPhone or Samsung competitor.
. . . . 2. The first Pixel just recently hit the 1 million sold mark. This is not an iPhone or Samsung competitor.
If I were Google I'd focus on trying to put that finger print sensor underneath the glass as opposed to the back, like Apple are trying to do instead of adding gimmicks like this to their device...
1. Dumbest smartphone feature I've seen in a long time.
2. The first Pixel just recently hit the 1 million sold mark. This is not an iPhone or Samsung competitor.
LOL don't judge it based on sales. I love that one. Fine: It's literally less than half the speed of the iPhone. It does not have a linear haptic motor. No pressure sensitivity on the screen. No stereo speakers. Not water resistant. Screen is dimmer than the iPhone and doesn't support native DCI-P3 color gamut. It's much thicker. Despite having a very good camera, Pixel only includes a single lens system so it only has crappy digital zooming, and without optical image stabilization, the video isn't as good. The fingerprint scanner is on the back. The design is as ugly as it gets. Anything else? I would have given it a + for a headphone jack but since getting AirPods for my wife and beatsX for myself, I realize a headphone jack is a waste of space. Wireless freedom is amazing.Don't judge it based on the sales. Of course they were never going to compete with Samsung or Apple. But it is a great phone, if you've ever used one. Very snappy, great camera.
How does Siri require two hands? It requires zero hands ("Hey Siri") or one (hold down the home button). You're either very daft or you've never used an iPhone before (which is highly correlative with such a state). Squeezing a large phone will often require adjusting your grip on the phone to do so. You operate a phone by resting it in your fingers while your thumb reaches around to tap around on the front screen. Siri requires you to press on the front screen (or just talk). Squeezing the phone will require many to bring it in closer/more centered on their Palm, making it impossible to reach the far side of the screen with your thumb.Not sure how the this is a "gimmick" or "dumbest smartphone feature I've seen in a long time." It's a far better implementation than launching Siri on an iPhone. This requires one hand. Siri requires two. Pixel feature works in conjunction with natural hand holding. Siri, no. These two posts read like fanboy nonsense at all costs.
It will become a Samsung competitor well before it becomes an iPhone competitor. That's a given. Right now, it's neither.I don't know about that.
Personally, I wouldn't underestimate the pull of regular updates in the Android world as well as the fact that this delivers "pure" Android without what some see as unwanted embellishments.
What component/part of a Pixel, exactly, is hard to come by? The standard, off the shelf screen? Qualcomm processor? Sony image sensor? They only sold a million until now because they didn't even believe in it themselves. HTC has the capacity to produce far more if given the purchase order ahead of time.It's a 2:1 ratio, so it's really thinner than this years?
Google made it clear during the presentation of the Pixel they didn't care about units sold. The only metric they cared about was customer satisfaction, which I'd assume has been pretty high. Google Pixel is pretty great overall, iPhone feel on an Android package.
They've sold few due to supply issues with parts. Phone was out of stock most of the year. Still, I'm pretty sure 'units sold' is not their main goal for the time being (first years). They just want to find a formula that works well, for those who buy into it, and if it does, ramp it up.
Then we'll just make cases you can squeeze the phone in.75% of users put a case on their phone (and 87% of iPhone users), making this feature useless.
. . . It will become a Samsung competitor well before it becomes an iPhone competitor. That's a given. Right now, it's neither.