Apple isn’t manufacturing this phone with in-display touchid. Will be on the flagships before the budget models.Of course Apple can make full-screen SE without faceID for $399 and there are option to put in-display touchID.
Apple isn’t manufacturing this phone with in-display touchid. Will be on the flagships before the budget models.Of course Apple can make full-screen SE without faceID for $399 and there are option to put in-display touchID.
Not everyone wants a huge phone and not everyone wants to spend $700+. I fit in the first category and will be getting one, but then would also get the 5.4" in September if it ends up being even smaller.
People interested in the G8 are not interested in iOS and vice-versa.
Evolution of the smartphone market, which has been trending towards larger models for some time.
I would not be surprised if the original SE was 4" because it leveraged the existing 4" production process which allowed Apple to hit the $399 price point while still making their desired margin. I fully expect it is the same with this "SE2", but the production process is now 4.7" instead of 4".
Making it smaller would actually increase the production cost because Apple no longer has that production process. For those who continue to use the SE first and foremost because it is 4" might very well pay a higher price for an update in that form factor, but they are a small(er) part of the general smartphone market so Apple is going 4.7" to appeal to the larger portion of that market who prefer / desire a larger phone.
iOS is in higher demand than iPad OS. Your pricing is only your opinion. Apple charges what people will pay.
I bet if they made a 4” iPhone the only option these XL MaX+ customers would buy it because it’s the only option with iOS. Then we could say, see!, people prefer smaller phones again.For some it was size, for some it was price, for some it was both. And for some it was probably more about familiarity than specific size (i.e. if the iPhone 5(S) had been 5", they would have upgraded to a same size SE).
I'm in the size group, but it is a small group. Even Android with its diverse hardware does not bother with this group. Sony was the last bigger brand with a compact phone. One would think small phone lovers would have flocked to Sony, and maybe they did, but it must have been a small flock, as Sony discontinued that line despite its "monopoly".
Most in the size group probably settle for something bigger when the options become limited; the die-hards who absolutely insist on 4" are too few. While I think Apple could make a profitable 4" iPhone, they can probably count on most of those customers settling for 4.7" when that is all there is.
consumers don’t need to have the latest technology, especially when they want a smaller form factor.
Ok admit it...you just want to hear Eddy/Phil say it on stage. Lol Better yet how about SE X Pro lolI still think it would be great if they call it the “SE X”. Hardeeharhar!
Hard to say if they will keep the XR another year at that price point as Apple may want to reserve FaceID for $599+ for now. I could see it going either way, but otherwise that lineup looks about right to me (with regular 12s getting 4 GB of RAM and the 12 Pros getting 6 GB of RAM).So when fall rolls around the line up will likely be
iPhone 9 (?) $399 A13 64 GB LTE LCD
iPhone XR $499 A12 64 GB LTE LCD
iPhone 11 $599 A13 64 GB LTE LCD
iPhone 12, 5.4 inch $699 A14 64 GB 5G OLED
iPhone 12, 6.1 inch $799 A14 64 GB 5G OLED
iPhone 12 Pro, 6.1 inch $999 A14 128 GB 5G OLED ToF camera
iPhone 12 Pro Max, 6.7 inch $1099 A14 128 GB 5G OLED ToF camera
This looks to have something for everyone at a range of great price points. Perhaps Apple will drop the iPhone XR and jump from the $399 iPhone 9 to the $599 iPhone 11, but I doubt it.
Aaaand, you'll get one Android update about a year after it is released, and a SOC comparable to a 5 year old iPhone. Enjoy!Starting at $399 you can get in-display fingerprint, OLED and FHD for the Android Smartphone made by Samsung. The $399 iPhone doesn't have any of that features.
Unlikely - Apple is making a lot off their Airpods and Beats lineup and they would like that to continue.Hope new SE carries a headphone jack otherwise Pixel 4a will beat it.
Hope new SE carries a headphone jack otherwise Pixel 4a will beat it.
Two primary use cases:Genuine question, why does it matter that a phone has a headphone jack?
Does (did) the Sony run iOS?For some it was size, for some it was price, for some it was both. And for some it was probably more about familiarity than specific size (i.e. if the iPhone 5(S) had been 5", they would have upgraded to a same size SE).
I'm in the size group, but it is a small group. Even Android with its diverse hardware does not bother with this group. Sony was the last bigger brand with a compact phone. One would think small phone lovers would have flocked to Sony, and maybe they did, but it must have been a small flock, as Sony discontinued that line despite its "monopoly".
Most in the size group probably settle for something bigger when the options become limited; the die-hards who absolutely insist on 4" are too few. While I think Apple could make a profitable 4" iPhone, they can probably count on most of those customers settling for 4.7" when that is all there is.
Yeah, I think $599 is the floor for a FaceID model. I don’t see much possibility of the XR staying around. I don’t think the Pros necessarily get 128GB base storage either, could be a 2021 thing.Hard to say if they will keep the XR another year at that price point as Apple may want to reserve FaceID for $599+ for now. I could see it going either way, but otherwise that lineup looks about right to me (with regular 12s getting 4 GB of RAM and the 12 Pros getting 6 GB of RAM).
I doubt Apple could sell more than a few million 4” iPhones at $700+. The iPhone “SE2” is projected at 20-30 million first year sales.hafta disagree. price has nothing to do with SE appeal. it's all about size.
Introducing a budget iPhone is fine and I'm sure there's a market for it, but is unrelated to introducing a reasonably-sized iPhone (3.5-4"). Give ppl their budget iPhone at whatever size, and then give the rest of us a 4" iPhone with flagship internals (but NO face ID) somewhere in the $700-1000 range. Actually, to get a new 4" phone I'd pay more than that.
Two primary use cases:
1. Using the phone in the car - I have an older car without bluetooth (but with an aux input) and I plug in my 6S for GPS and music/podcasts while driving. There are NO high quality adapters on the market that provide 3.5mm input and charging. The Belkin one is low quality (see all the reviews about it breaking after some number of months), and the only alternatives are even worse quality. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong and there's a high quality adapter out there.
2. I have tons of wired headphones that sound better than airpods and don't need to be charged and I don't want to have to find a dongle to use them. I guess I can fork out the $9 per pair of headphones to buy a dongle each and semi-permanently attach it to the headphones but that's something else that could fail, get lost, etc.
Losing the headphone jack is the primary thing that keeps me from enthusiastically waiting for the SE2/9 announcement.
Edit: forgot to mention, the DAC in the adapters that I have tried have terrible sound quality. The DAC in my 6S is great.
Yep, you could certainly be right about Pros getting 64 GB base storage. That's actually enough for most people if they don't keep a large music collection or a bunch of photos/videos on their phone.Yeah, I think $599 is the floor for a FaceID model. I don’t see much possibility of the XR staying around. I don’t think the Pros necessarily get 128GB base storage either, could be a 2021 thing.
Yeah, when will Mercedes make cars with round headlights again? When are they going to realize not everyone wants cars with these amorphous slithers as headlights? We also want a handbrake between the front seats.
Hope it doesn't come with an embarrassing near 720p display considering the upcoming $249 Moto G8 Power has 6.4" FHD+, 4GB/64GB, 5000mAh battery, mask friendly fingerprint authentication, etc.
I could see them putting 32 GB base storage at the $399 price point (which would match pricing & storage of the "refreshed" SE), but I don't see 16 GB returning to iPhones or iPads...What’s the betting this affordable price signals the return of 16gb storage for the base models?
$399 seems to reasonable for Apple. One thing is for sure, they’ll find a way to cripple it for that price. Hope I’m wrong.
You say "only" as if that matters to the people buying the cheapest iPhone available.That is a shocker, yes it's been reported to be at $399, however, I was thinking it would be $449 or $499. Watch it be $399 with only 32GB of storage and $499 for 128GB of storage...
6S & 7 and a iPhone 11 in my house, and yes I will.Plenty for the target market.
You wouldn't and Apple doesn't want you to.
You’re wrong 🙂 The 8 that the new “SE2” will replace is 64GB, and it sells for $449. I could see 32GB this year bumping to 64 next year, like they did with the first SE.What’s the betting this affordable price signals the return of 16gb storage for the base models?
$399 seems to reasonable for Apple. One thing is for sure, they’ll find a way to cripple it for that price. Hope I’m wrong.