Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
...I have faster actual clock speeds right now in my 14 imac. Is this the end of the line of raw processing power increases, not to mention number of cores seems stagnant as well?

Clock speed scaling (Dennard Scaling) mostly stopped around 2007: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennard_scaling That is not a new development.

Since then CPU performance developments have emphasized improving Instructions Per Clock cycle (IPC), adding additional cores, and adding specific hardware for certain cases (AVX instructions, Quick Sync, etc).

The ability to wring out additional IPC performance is dwindling, as most CPU architectural tricks have already been used.

For computers with Sandy Bridge or earlier CPUs, upgrading to Skylake may bring significant improvements. For computers with Haswell or Broadwell CPUs, the situation is less clear. E.g, the Haswell "Devil's Canyon" i7-4790K CPU was used in the 4Ghz 5k iMac. The fastest equivalent Skylake part is the i7-6700K, and it's only about 5% faster overall: http://www.anandtech.com/show/9483/intel-skylake-review-6700k-6600k-ddr4-ddr3-ipc-6th-generation

Intel could put 8 cores on mainstream non-Xeon i7 CPUs, but it would be an expensive part and many iMac workloads would not benefit dramatically. It would greatly help aspects of FCP X, Lightroom, etc -- anybody who has monitored the activity of those with iStat Menus or similar utilities can see that. They are heavily multithreaded, frequently CPU bound on all available threads, so the more cores the better. However that does not characterize general use and for those specialized cases there's the Mac Pro.
 
I agree with the overall comments that performance will not get a significant boost under Skylake but what about the other advantages of the new platform (Thunderbolt 3, DDR4, Video enconding/decoding, etc) ?

Given the iMac limited thermal headroom, Skylake's power management features and better thermal control should increase the life expectancy of any iMac working under load most of the time (professional software, image processing, audio/video production, etc)
 
It's beginning to sound to me that any fall 2015 release of a 27" riMac would be somewhat incremental - not really a big step in anything.
 
I agree with the overall comments that performance will not get a significant boost under Skylake but what about the other advantages of the new platform (Thunderbolt 3, DDR4, Video enconding/decoding, etc) ?...

I don't see Thunderbolt 3 or DDR4 making any significant near-term difference for typical or even higher-end iMac workloads. Longer-term Thunderbolt 3 might eventually be nice, once those devices become commonplace and once you get over the pain of having to use an adapter for older devices. Likewise the performance difference of DDR4 is microscopic in most situations: http://www.anandtech.com/show/8959/...-3200-with-gskill-corsair-adata-and-crucial/8

There are a few cases where the upgraded Quick Sync in Skylake could be of significant benefit -- in narrow, highly specific scenarios such as H.265 encode/decode.
 
Honestly, I am tired of waiting. As soon as they release anything new, short of taking a backwards step like they did with the Mac Mini, I am buying it. I don't care if it's a Broadwell or Skylake chip, spinner or SSD, bargain video card or 10K ultra-retina.

My MBP died on me this week, so I am down a primary computer. I'm able to get stuff done on my other machine, but it's not the same. My patience & ability to wait have run out.
 
My Dad's iMac from 2006 is on it's last legs , so I agree - I'm buying anything affordable they bring out for him - I'm sure he'll love it :)

Speed doesn't matter as everything is fast these days !! Gawd - that thing is sooooo slooooooowwwww
 
Y
Don't cry, they can still update iMacs without an event! They seem to do that a lot.
You are right, especially when it's not a redesign or jump to Retina. It should be more of an incremental upgrade. But it still worries me that it could mean early 2016...
 
Rumors imply it'll be announced in October and shipping in November, or possibly even shipping late October. I've been itching for a new computer for so long, the wait is killing me, so I hope we don't have to wait for 2016!
 
  • Like
Reactions: EnesM
Rumors imply it'll be announced in October and shipping in November, or possibly even shipping late October. I've been itching for a new computer for so long, the wait is killing me, so I hope we don't have to wait for 2016!
It's gonna be my first iMac so I can't tell you what this wait is doing to me :)
 
It's gonna be my first iMac so I can't tell you what this wait is doing to me :)
I feel your pain! ;-) My husband has an iMac but I've been using a MacBook Pro for the last 5+ years and it's getting a little slow. I'm ready for an iMac!
 
aaand no mention of Macs...surely they'll make at least a smaller event in October, they need to talk about El Capitan once more right?
 
Jud
I don't really expect an event... just an overnight update. Its an incremental update.
Judging by its past record, Apple always released OX update along with updated Macs, right? In that case, Sep 30 should be the date to look forward to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aussiemom
Unless you're a massive gamer, or perhaps a graphics artist, is there any real reason to hold off? Even if you are a gamer - since no one has said anything official there is no way of knowing if there is a new GPU in the pipeline, or what it is if there is one. So what exactly am I waiting for :confused:
 
I thinking now it's a late September/early October quiet release of the retina 27" with Broadwell and updated graphics, regular 27" dropped.
 
My Dad's iMac from 2006 is on it's last legs , so I agree - I'm buying anything affordable they bring out for him - I'm sure he'll love it :)

Speed doesn't matter as everything is fast these days !! Gawd - that thing is sooooo slooooooowwwww
Got the 2008 on life support with an external FW SSD. Poor thing is faster than new but creeks along!

Not being a long time follower of mac and how apple tends to do things - how far in advance of something new will apple fess up?
If you hear about something before a release or announcement, it's happened in spite of apples best efforts. Some of the largest and longest leaks tend to happen with the products that have the deepest supply chain (read: iphone).

There are only two exceptions to this
1) when Apple shares information about a new model in the (usually) fall that begins to ship in the winter
2) when supplies of an old model have already dried up (rare)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.