A couple questions: Is the new 9.7 using a different type of RAM than the Air 2? Also, I noticed on the GeekBench graph @ZBoater posted, the A9X multi-core memory score is a good bit higher than the Air 2.
What does it matter how old a product is as long as the performance is up to par with the current model. Especially when the price difference is more like 250$ when you factor in what you could get a refurb ipad air 2 direct from apple for. That's like saying " I wont buy a 2014 Honda civic because even though its much cheaper, looks identical, and basically performs the same as a 2015 model, its still a year older..."
The Geekbench graph is inaccurate. Did you read my response?A couple questions: Is the new 9.7 using a different type of RAM than the Air 2? Also, I noticed on the GeekBench graph @ZBoater posted, the A9X multi-core memory score is a good bit higher than the Air 2.
The Geekbench graph is inaccurate. Did you read my response?
In what way is the display 'vastly improved' (apart from the True Tone inaccurate color gimmick)?
Says photographic evidence.Says who? You?
LOL!
Pro 9.7" display is:
25% Brighter
25% Wider Colour Gamut
40% Less Reflective
True Tone (To some may be a gimmick but can be turned off so there if you want it)
Photo Aligned
Says photographic evidence.
https://mobile.twitter.com/panzer/status/712331691579219968/photo/2
LOL!
Says photographic evidence.
https://mobile.twitter.com/panzer/status/712331691579219968/photo/2
LOL!
[doublepost=1458924215][/doublepost]
And the same thing was said about the Air 2.
But the Air 2 screen actually had a physical improvement - the digitiser and LCD were laminated and fused together.
To me at least, what you're saying doesn't mean anything.
Without physical evidence from those reviewers, it doesn't matter what they say.And what am I supposed to be looking at that the Ars Technica reviewers missed?
Without physical evidence from those reviewers, it doesn't matter what they say.
The picture clearly shows that the actual score as far as proof goes, is around 100 points lower than that graph.
Just a few minutes ago I recommended the Pro 9.7 to a guy who was a graphic designer and planned on getting a medium sized tablet to draw on.No it wasn't, sure that was the first time they added an antireflective coating to the display and fused the 3 layers into 1 layer to make the screen better and eliminate air gap. Nothing else was said about the display when they were showing off the Air 2.
Everyone could say the same thing and it still wouldn't mean anything to you on this topic. Sorry but it seems your just here to be critical of a new product. Don't like it, don't buy it. Let others make up their minds for themselves.
Just a few minutes ago I recommended the Pro 9.7 to a guy who was a graphic designer and planned on getting a medium sized tablet to draw on.
And by 'no it wasn't' are you saying it wasn't a physical improvement? Do you even know what you're saying?
Excuse me for criticising a RAM crippled overpriced product though!
/sarcasm
When the difference is <600 points, 100 points make a big difference!100 points? Is that what you are complaining about???
You do realize that these tests have a very small variance, right? The point here is the difference between the new Pro and the Air 20, almost 15% in multi core.
+/- 100 points of course. Geez
We'll have to wait and see.By 'No it wasn't' I meant that the same things which I listed earlier (25% brighter, etc) were not said about the Air 2.
EXACTLY! Some people just don't understand!LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE, take off the apple shades and pay attention to everyday use metrics, not some geekbench scores which in theory paint little to no picture because or the marginal gains as to how the device will function for day to to day basic use as most of you will use it. If you don't NEED the pencil then there will be no difference in daily use. So just say it! You are buying it because you have money burning a hole in your pocket and regardless of what apple would of released, you were going to justify the purchase because you have been waiting to upgrade and you are dying to spend the money. TRUTH!
What does it matter how old a product is as long as the performance is up to par with the current model. Especially when the price difference is more like 250$ when you factor in what you could get a refurb ipad air 2 direct from apple for. That's like saying " I wont buy a 2014 Honda civic because even though its much cheaper, looks identical, and basically performs the same as a 2015 model, its still a year older..."
Admit it, you would of bought it even if was the same specs as the Air 2 plus pencil support. That money must be burning a hole in you're pocket.You genuinely think that technology changes at the same snail's pace of a car? 1.5 years is a full cycle of Moore's Law - and if you factor that into the car equation - e.g., buying a 1.5 yo Civic (yuk) that gets 35 MPG or buying a 2016 Civic that gets 70MPG - you bet your tiny little internet bottom I'd buy the 2016.
I never said I was right and you were wrong, and unlike other good folks in this thread I'm not casting silly aspersions and name calling. I stated why I bought the new Pro... lighten up you two. If price is more import to you that getting one full update cycle, by all means go buy it; hell, buy what you want anyway.![]()
Admit it, you would of bought it even if was the same specs as the Air 2 plus pencil support. That money must be burning a hole in you're pocket.
We currently have the iPad 3, 4 and Air in the household. They run surprisingly well on iOS 9 (smoother than iOS 7/8 at any rate). The iPad 3 was just too laggy on iOS 7/8. Then again, even when first purchased, it didn't run quite as smooth as the older iPad 2 with lower resolution. The A5X just wasn't enough for smooth operation with the Retina display. The iPad 4 has handled firmware updates just as well as the Air. Maybe even better as the 32-bit iPad 4 seems to be more efficient at handling RAM than the 64-bit Air.None until Apple drops support for features in the new OS versions; ala Air 1 no multitasking. Yes I get it's a RAM issue, but things aren't quite as smooth on iOS9 on an iPAd 3 or 4 or even Air 1.
You forgot one more thing and that is a much faster and more powerful chip the A9X chip in the new 9.7 inch iPad Pro!![]()
Don't even consider it.
Unless you really NEED to use an Apple Pencil.
You'll do anything to justify that new Apple product, won't you?I disagree there are other worthwhile features besides the pencil support. Even coming from an Air 2 it's worth considering the new Pro.
You'll do anything to justify that new Apple product, won't you?