Someone pointed out that this is borderline fraud from apple.....there should be NO reason why we should let this slide.
I'm no legal guru, but I've seen people sue Apple for far less...
Someone pointed out that this is borderline fraud from apple.....there should be NO reason why we should let this slide.
Or, they could just sell the cards as they are (EFI64), and provide an EFI32 re-flashing utility in Software Update, or download from apple.com. Those early mac Pro owners could just download and run the utility. No need to ship a separate SKU.
I'm no legal guru, but I've seen people sue Apple for far less...![]()
The fact that Apple didn't even bother to test the 8800GT on the earlier MacPros shows how hollow Apple's claims of upgradeability are. Attempting to blame this on Nvidia won't work. I'm sure Nvidia built the card to Apple's specifications. I also believe that compatibility with the earlier MacPro was not part of those specifications. Apple has got to learn that we are not going to buy a $3000 computer every year just to keep up with technology. I for one will probably go the hackintosh route rather than spend thousands on another Apple product that will be obsolete within a year.
I'm going to give it another month or so, but after that, if there is the possibility of a class action lawsuit I would actually consider jumping on. Sometimes I feel embarrassed about the way people just fire off lawsuits for any little thing, but in this case I'm in a position where I have a studio full of Mac Pros will are now slowly fading into obsolescence in terms of graphics cards because of Apple's total inability to deliver on a promise they made about this being the most expandable, upgradable Mac in the range. That's potentially tens of thousands of dollars in upgrade costs if I have to go down the route of buying complete new systems.
The point with lawsuits (or even the threat of a lawsuit) is that they are rarely won or lost - in fact they hardly ever get to court; but they generate enough bad publicity for the corporation being sued to make them do something about it. Speaking as the guy who got an email from Jobs saying 'it's being worked' we also have a statement direct from the CEO giving what may be misleading advice on which people could have made purchasing decisions. I think that would add a *lot* of strength to the case.
There are people with 2008 models out there that might come across the update on the Apple support site, flash their cards and possibly have an unserviceable computer.
I think we'll see new cards out with both EFIs on them in a month or so.
Well, actually, a EFI driver can be built either in architecture dependant code (32bit or 64bit x86, itanium ...) or in EFI bytecode. And EFI bytecode runs fine on any architecture. This is the format that ATI uses, and that makes their cards work in both old and new Mac Pros. I don't know why Nvidia didn't go that way as well ...
Blaming anybody won't work. We are in the dark and everyone is just speculating about blame and motive and what actually happened. The fact is that we just don't know, and a lot of people are just jumping to conclusions. Apple has been guilty of ignoring previous buyers in the past (and I have been a victim of that), but today's situation is far different than when they were confined to PPC hardware. In those days it was a necessity from a business point of view to just move on. That's not the case today.
We will never see the plethora of video cards available for the PC, and in some ways that's a very good thing. It means that in the long run, we get drivers that are more mature and reliable. Apple's market share and non-mainstream OS will ensure a limited supply of the "latest and greatest" until it becomes financially viable for third parties to make a profit. At that point, we'll probably suffer the present aberrations in video drivers available to PC buyers, together with slightly better performance. I'm not convinced one is better than the other, unless you are a gamer. On a production machine, reliability and stability is paramount.
The Mac Pro is not, and will never be a top-notch gaming machine. Admittedly there is a market for just such a machine now that Windows runs natively on Macs and so many PC users are defecting, but that machine would use a single multi-core processor and cheaper, less reliable, but faster memory. And cost a lot less.
I hope they build one.
Blaming anybody won't work. We are in the dark and everyone is just speculating about blame and motive and what actually happened. The fact is that we just don't know, and a lot of people are just jumping to conclusions. Apple has been guilty of ignoring previous buyers in the past (and I have been a victim of that), but today's situation is far different than when they were confined to PPC hardware. In those days it was a necessity from a business point of view to just move on. That's not the case today.
We will never see the plethora of video cards available for the PC, and in some ways that's a very good thing. It means that in the long run, we get drivers that are more mature and reliable. Apple's market share and non-mainstream OS will ensure a limited supply of the "latest and greatest" until it becomes financially viable for third parties to make a profit. At that point, we'll probably suffer the present aberrations in video drivers available to PC buyers, together with slightly better performance. I'm not convinced one is better than the other, unless you are a gamer. On a production machine, reliability and stability is paramount.
The Mac Pro is not, and will never be a top-notch gaming machine. Admittedly there is a market for just such a machine now that Windows runs natively on Macs and so many PC users are defecting, but that machine would use a single multi-core processor and cheaper, less reliable, but faster memory. And cost a lot less.
I hope they build one.
Also, how do you know there is no legal claim here? I think its worth going to competent lawyer and getting their view..particularly if you are a commercial user.
Exactly which driver would fit this description for my two pre 2008 Mac Pro's? In light of all the problems people have had with the ATI 1900 card, I don't see one.
And that's why everyone is so annoyed. In my estimation you are cutting Apple way too much slack in trying to explain for them how this might have occurred.
They have left the customers who bought their UPGRADEABLE new Mac Pro's without a decent video card alternative. And many of them just bought the machine less than a year ago. That's just indefensible no matter which spin or excuse anyone tries to throw out there. And Apple's muted inaction for two months now only compounds it.
Two things - (1) there is a reason we are in the dark. No official word from Apple. A denial would be a disaster and a confirmation creates an obligation. Silence speaks volumes here. Not even an acknowledgment from Apple despite an active petition and this thread being by far the biggest on this forum. Well, there was an acknowledgment of sorts..Apple deletes these threads on this subject from its official support site. (2) Stop saying its about reliability or blaming Nvidea or small market share. The freaking card ALREADY EXISTS for the new Mac Pro. Nvidea has already built this card. How do you explain how it was not made backwards compatible?
Also, how do you know there is no legal claim here? I think its worth going to competent lawyer and getting their view..particularly if you are a commercial user.
Blogger, do you work for Apple? You've been almost irrationally defensive of them. Anyone disagreeing should re-read his posts.
The cooler heads were here, about two months ago, when they promised a fix in a few weeks, which is now turning into a few months.That's not the first time that someone's said that, and the answer is no. What you percieve as a pro-Apple bias is nothing of the sort. I've had my issues and disappointments with Apple before. I was pissed of about the 8800 incompatibility issue. But the level of stupidity and naivety spouted here is quite incredible. So many posts pluck fanciful stories out of the air, make the assumption that that is the exact truth and get angry about it. It's nonsense of course and it's obviously an exercise in futility for me trying to play the devil's advocate to try and maintain some balance.
There were a lot of cooler heads here earlier on in the thread, but all have been drowned out by the angry teenagers. I say teenagers, because that's exactly what they sound like. Well I've had enough, too. I won't be posting here again as I've got better things to do than argue with idiots.
You guys waste your time irrationally venting your spleens to your hearts' content. I for one won't be reading it.
Cheers!
Surprising...That's not the first time that someone's said that, and the answer is no.
Perhaps you should check the url in your browser: It's a RUMORS forum.So many posts pluck fanciful stories out of the air, make the assumption that that is the exact truth and get angry about it.
Hmmm...I didn't get that impression. But as kids in "my" generation used to say, "It takes one to know one."I say teenagers, because that's exactly what they sound like.
Bravo! Thank you sir, for showing us how to do that.You guys waste your time irrationally venting your spleens to your hearts' content.
The Mac Pro is not, and will never be a top-notch gaming machine.
As all the games are on windows, couldnt you buy the latest and greatest graphics card and use it under bootcamp windows to play games??
As for the nvidia 8800gt, I've heard that apple is working on a nvidia 8800gt version for the older mac pro. I really want them to support the older mac pro as my mac pro will be old next year and I'd want to upgrade the gpu next year as well.
But wouldnt you need to unplug your monitor from the one card and put it on the other card? Sounds like a pain.
I'm going to give it another month or so, but after that, if there is the possibility of a class action lawsuit I would actually consider jumping on. Sometimes I feel embarrassed about the way people just fire off lawsuits for any little thing, but in this case I'm in a position where I have a studio full of Mac Pros will are now slowly fading into obsolescence in terms of graphics cards because of Apple's total inability to deliver on a promise they made about this being the most expandable, upgradable Mac in the range. That's potentially tens of thousands of dollars in upgrade costs if I have to go down the route of buying complete new systems.
The point with lawsuits (or even the threat of a lawsuit) is that they are rarely won or lost - in fact they hardly ever get to court; but they generate enough bad publicity for the corporation being sued to make them do something about it. Speaking as the guy who got an email from Jobs saying 'it's being worked' we also have a statement direct from the CEO giving what may be misleading advice on which people could have made purchasing decisions. I think that would add a *lot* of strength to the case.
Not really, just unplug and plug thats right on below the card, takes nothing but 5 seconds.