As the MacPro has been delayed for so long it will then probably come out together with the MacBook Pro. All with USB 3 then ? Then, I'll hold before getting a new notebook.
wholesale fashion
wholesale fashion
As the MacPro has been delayed for so long it will then probably come out together with the MacBook Pro. All with USB 3 then ? Then, I'll hold before getting a new notebook.
wholesale fashion
i still want a small box with a lot of horsepower. *Something that contains the basics,
- Two high end processors each with multiple cores
- Fast graphics card
- Room for the same or half the ram of the big box
- Room for two hard drives
Something that doesn't take up a lot of space and I can move it off the floor and on to my desktop without being too obtrusive. *I'm willing to pay the base big box price.
First of all, what USB 3.0 devices are shipping to use this? Or is this just a developer platform?
Also, as far as LightPeak goes, that is going to be on PCI Express cards for a while that cost as much as the PC til someone figures out a cheaper, low loss fiber optic to silicon fabrication process.
How many countries have Netflix?How come my 85 year old father-in-law streams Netflix movies to his iMac then?
Yep, i gues internet is backed up to hddYep, i gues internet is backed up to optical mediaWhat a joke.
The beaty of optical media is that almost every computer today can read 30 years old optical disk. Not so with any other media.In a box in my office is a 250 MB HDD from my 1996 Performa. I replaced it with a 4.3 GB HDD. Also in the box is a 250 MB HDD from an external drive that used a SCSI connector. That was my backup before I bought a second 4.3 GB HDD to put in the external enclosure. And those drives cannot be connected to my 2008 Mac easily. I'm sure someone makes a connecting adapter, but it's probably expensive.
It was 1991 when I bought my first 2 CDs, For Our Children, and Late Night Grande Hotel. The CDs are put away, and I listen to these from my iTunes collection. I had seen portable CD players in a Radio Shack store, but that was probably the late 1980s. It was priced at something over $200. That also was about the same time I saw a demonstration of a CD which had an entire encyclopedia stored on it. (I also saw a demonstration of a ruby laser in 1965 at an ACS meeting, but that's another story.)
Bluray sucks as every other optical media. It takes a lot of space inside the computer and it is mechanical.
Cheapest are less than $100 now.1.
Expensive players.
Lots of bd movies available in $5-$10.2.
Very very expensive media. I enjoy a good movie at a fair price but I don't want to single handily support the drug habits of every hollywood star.
iTunes movies have similiar DRM.3.
The required encryption is overbearing and has a negative impact on the reliability of the PC the software runs on.
All streaming/download movies are encrypted.5.
Voting for Blu-Ray is giving you approval for radical copyright holders. The encryption is such that the works may never end up in the public domain. In essence by supporting BluRay you are bastardizing 200 years of what was reasonable copyright law.
Easier with bd than with online content.6.
Being able to make personal copies of a file should not be a crime and should not be difficult.
Hmmm, lets see... Lets take 2560x1440, 12bit colors, 60fps, 3D. That will make 5.3 Gbps. Douh!LightPeak isn't an audio/video panacea either. it makes for great demos, but where is the need for 5Gb/s video ? Uncompressed 1080p HD is in the sub 180MB/s range.
Ok, but cd's I have from 80's are not burned, they are pressed. And so are bd movies.Not trying to pick a fight, but this incorrect information that optical storage like CD-R and DVD-R has a long shelf life is just WRONG (as opposed to CD-ROM or DVD-ROM). Note that in the "ROM" variation the grooves are pressed by a master during replication, while the "R" variation uses a laser to cut the grooves in a blank disk. The latter are not a long-term reliable storage medium.
Since you asked, let's look at the National Archives web-page titled:
"Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Optical Storage Media: Storing Temporary Records on CDs and DVDs":
6. How long can I expect my recorded CDs/DVDs to last?
CD/DVD experiential life expectancy is 2 to 5 years even though published life expectancies are often cited as 10 years, 25 years, or longer. However, a variety of factors discussed in the sources cited in FAQ 15, below, may result in a much shorter life span for CDs/DVDs. Life expectancies are statistically based; any specific medium may experience a critical failure before its life expectancy is reached. Additionally, the quality of your storage environment may increase or decrease the life expectancy of the media. We recommend testing your media at least every two years to assure your records are still readable.
http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/initiatives/temp-opmedia-faq.html
The cited FAQ 15 lists government agencies around the world and their recommendations. The British National Archive recommends a bit by bit varification of the optical discs every 6 months to ensure integrity. Try doing that with 100 blu-ray recorded disks.
My strategy is to build archives around the concept of a rotating out every storage medium to a fresh, new medium every three years, and then to have triple backups of every piece of data. One off-site, of course. So monthy off-site of multi-TB HDDs runs circles around blu-ray.
Finally, someone with something to say that's related to the article, not blu ray blah blah blah...
I couldn't agree with you more.
We need a mini tower in the price range of the core i5 iMac with limited (but not non-existent) internal expandability.
When jobs took over again, those desktop and minitower G3s where an affordable setup, the G4 and G5 systems followed with only the higher end quad systems beginning to have pricing beyond a joke at the lower end.
Then the intel Mac Pros came out and*I don't need over £2000 worth of 8 core xeon beast in a huge case!
What about a single 4 or 6 core xeon/core i7, 4 RAM slots, 2 user upgradable drive bays in addition to the system drive, 1 empty expansion slot and a user replacable graphics card in the slot next to it for £1099?
There's a hole in their range that needs to be filled with a system like this.
Apple wouldn't be gouging sales of either the iMac or Mac pro, they'd be selling the Macmini TOWER to existing mac owners who wouldn't be satisfied with the power of the mac mini for very long, don't want to go the second hand route on a mac pro and don't want a giant laptop with an external keyboard and mouse. *More importantly for Apple, they'd be catering for potential switchers who'd finally have a mac they can switch to!
My G4 has 3 internal drives, full RAM expansion to 1.5Gb and 2 graphics cards running a 23" LCD, a 19" LCDs and a TV. *I record to one drive, boot from another and use the 3rd for general storage with a 1Tb external USB 2.0 drive for backups.
I'm currently looking at an early 2009 mac mini (if I can find one in mid august) as my only viable/affordable replacement with the following additions and tricky internal upgrades to work around the short comings of it's limitations at a later date:-
1) a 500 or 750Gb External 7200rpm Oxford based FireWire drive partitioned for recording/general storage.
2) Replace my TV with a 23" 1080p one mounted above my 23" LCD monitor on*a vertical VESA stand.
This also leaves me with just a desk and chair for my entire mac/entertainment system. *Very clean and tidy!*
*
3) OWC 8gb memory kit and tool kit to work inside the mac mini.
4) A single SSD for the system drive.
A mini tower would be simpler:-
1) buy a larger, cheaper internal 3.5" drive for recording/storage
2) TV idea as above
3) cheap 8Gb RAM upgrade using 2Gb desktop DIMMs
4) SSD upgrade as above but maybe even have 2 smaller SSDs RAIDED together as a cheaper and faster alternative?
I know I'm dreaming. *I'll get the mac mini, be so blown away by how much faster it is than my 8 year old dual G4 that I'll ignore all the external extras plugged into it and probably still be demanding a mini tower for my next mac after that one in 3 or 4 years![]()
My strategy is to build archives around the concept of a rotating out every storage medium to a fresh, new medium every three years, and then to have triple backups of every piece of data. One off-site, of course. So monthy off-site of multi-TB HDDs runs circles around blu-ray.
What about a single 4 or 6 core xeon/core i7, 4 RAM slots, 2 user upgradable drive bays in addition to the system drive, 1 empty expansion slot and a user replacable graphics card in the slot next to it for £1099?
There's a hole in their range that needs to be filled with a system like this.
I had a 535, and test-drove a Mercedes coupe and sedan, and went running back to the BMW.
All streaming/download movies are encrypted.
Actually many if us have but honestly that has nothing to do with the hate for Blu-Ray. The hate can be summed up in a few items below:
1.
Expensive players.
2.
Very very expensive media. I enjoy a good movie at a fair price but I don't want to single handily support the drug habits of every hollywood star.
3.
The required encryption is overbearing and has a negative impact on the reliability of the PC the software runs on.
4.
Sure the audio is great but my hearing isn't.
5.
Voting for Blu-Ray is giving you approval for radical copyright holders. The encryption is such that the works may never end up in the public domain. In essence by supporting BluRay you are bastardizing 200 years of what was reasonable copyright law.
6.
Being able to make personal copies of a file should not be a crime and should not be difficult.
It is not the quality of the movies that is horrible, it is everything else associated with Blu-Ray. By buying Blu-Ray you undermine some of the fundamental freedoms and rights we have had for years as Americans.
And frankly no one cares! It isn't the movies that are the problem.
The big concern is people like you that have had the wool pulled over their eyes. You go gaga over the movie quality while the studios and associations hope you don't notice how the copyright law has been perverted in the last few years by big business.
People whine about Apples iPhone app store but then role over backwards for the Blu-Ray mafia. What the Blu-Ray folks are doing is many times worst and in the long run a far graver concern.
Dave
I have 200/100 Mbps for about the same. (200 Mbps local download speed inside country and 100 Mbps outside).
Finally, someone with something to say that's related to the article, not blu ray blah blah blah...
I couldn't agree with you more.
We need a mini tower in the price range of the core i5 iMac with limited (but not non-existent) internal expandability.
When jobs took over again, those desktop and minitower G3s where an affordable setup, the G4 and G5 systems followed with only the higher end quad systems beginning to have pricing beyond a joke at the lower end.
Then the intel Mac Pros came out and*I don't need over £2000 worth of 8 core xeon beast in a huge case!
What about a single 4 or 6 core xeon/core i7, 4 RAM slots, 2 user upgradable drive bays in addition to the system drive, 1 empty expansion slot and a user replacable graphics card in the slot next to it for £1099?
There's a hole in their range that needs to be filled with a system like this.
Apple wouldn't be gouging sales of either the iMac or Mac pro, they'd be selling the Macmini TOWER to existing mac owners who wouldn't be satisfied with the power of the mac mini for very long, don't want to go the second hand route on a mac pro and don't want a giant laptop with an external keyboard and mouse. *More importantly for Apple, they'd be catering for potential switchers who'd finally have a mac they can switch to!
My G4 has 3 internal drives, full RAM expansion to 1.5Gb and 2 graphics cards running a 23" LCD, a 19" LCDs and a TV. *I record to one drive, boot from another and use the 3rd for general storage with a 1Tb external USB 2.0 drive for backups.
I'm currently looking at an early 2009 mac mini (if I can find one in mid august) as my only viable/affordable replacement with the following additions and tricky internal upgrades to work around the short comings of it's limitations at a later date:-
1) a 500 or 750Gb External 7200rpm Oxford based FireWire drive partitioned for recording/general storage.
2) Replace my TV with a 23" 1080p one mounted above my 23" LCD monitor on*a vertical VESA stand.
This also leaves me with just a desk and chair for my entire mac/entertainment system. *Very clean and tidy!*
*
3) OWC 8gb memory kit and tool kit to work inside the mac mini.
4) A single SSD for the system drive.
A mini tower would be simpler:-
1) buy a larger, cheaper internal 3.5" drive for recording/storage
2) TV idea as above
3) cheap 8Gb RAM upgrade using 2Gb desktop DIMMs
4) SSD upgrade as above but maybe even have 2 smaller SSDs RAIDED together as a cheaper and faster alternative?
I know I'm dreaming. *I'll get the mac mini, be so blown away by how much faster it is than my 8 year old dual G4 that I'll ignore all the external extras plugged into it and probably still be demanding a mini tower for my next mac after that one in 3 or 4 years![]()
why does optical media suck? I really don't actually get it. We still can't access 1080p content yet over the streaming sites and it would require far too much space to store locally.
Many Of us want the "mythical mid range tower". Like what apple used to offer.
I have a mac pro and like the idea of USB 3. And definitely want blu-Ray. But a 4k tower aint cheap loaded up, Also many of us want more power than a iMac.
If the current 2.66GHz Mac Pro was £1099, would you have any issues or would you have bought one? Or is the size of it just too inconceivable? They aren't priced how they are because of their features or performance compared to the whole computer market, it's to put it above the iMac and maintain high margins across their product range.
No, that greedy, power-hungry, power-abusing, petty, vindictive, hypocritical old miser Steve Jobs is the whole world of hurt.
With Blu-ray drives: 0% goes to Apple
Without Blu-ray drives: forced to buy 720 (!!!!) media from the infamous WalledGarden vending machine known as iTunes (nickled and dimed to death, to which El Capitano Senor Jobs says where you can and can't use it), to which Apple gets XX% receives.
Meanwhile, is old Steve-O gonna pay for my additional data usage to downloand a frickin' 720 (!!!) media?Thought not.
"Hey, I got this great movie I wanna share w/ you. Here's my Mac Pro or iMac. Just borrow it and return it when you're done w/ it. Just make sure you lift w/ your back."