Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I already own several usb4/TB SSD. Again, that was not the point of this thread!
I can really recommend the corsair EX400U btw
 
@Frieg
Out of interest I tried to replicate your result, using an M4 Pro mini and an M1 mini.

I don't get the same result.
Connecting two different USB 3.1 Gen 2 10Gbps enclosures with a Kioxia or Samsung NVMe 1TB SSD inside,
I get BlackMagic (5GB file size) connection R/W speeds of 750-850MB/s in all cases using the TB5 or TB4 ports of the minis, and also from the front USB-C ports on the M4 Pro mini.

Only using the USB-A ports on the M1 mini does the speed drop to below 400MB/s, but Sysytem Information still reports 'up to 10Gbps'.
So it may be the USB-A to USB-C cable I'm using, because it came from a 3.5" HD enclosure, so it may only be USB 3.0...

The enclosures I'm using all have RTL-9210B-CG controller chips, and the OWC Mercury Elite Pro mini enclosure you mention is using an ASM235CM chip.
More importantly, that enclosure is designed for a SATA 3 2.5" SSD, which can never reach 10Gbps speeds, so maybe using a 5Gbps cable?
The problem you have may be specific to your particular situation.

This original thread post was noting the problems with M1 Macs in the Big Sur era.
You berate Apple for being 'lazy' and 'pathetic', 'or don't want to implement the standard'.

You also say "That's not the point of this thread." about the post from @ubercool about the increase of TB4 peripheral speeds when connected to a TB5 Mac.

I see the two as interconnected.
If Apple hasn't managed to rectify a USB 3.x connection problem, my guess is that it could only be solved at the expense of the proper working of the high speed TB4/5 ports.
That is the real world we care about today.

USB 3.0/3.1 hasn't really worked as a 'standard' that is backward compatible, and Apple has only looked backwards when it doesn't impede 'going forward'.
So complaining about this isn't going to make a difference, we have to live with this. 😉
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MacCheetah3
This original thread post was noting the problems with M1 Macs in the Big Sur era.
This appears like a significant observation.

As an update, the performance is ~720MB/s read and ~670MB/s write using AmorphousDiskMark (4GB) on front and rear ports of my M4 Pro Mac mini (macOS 15.5). It’s the same drive and enclosure I tested/reported earlier.

Because I now have an M1 Mac and I was curious, here are some results.

Tested products:

The SSK enclosure does link at 10Gb/s when connected with a USB-C to USB-C cable on either port.
View attachment 1790541
As for the speed verification.. Well, it is faster than USB 3.0 benchmarks, but not by leaps and bounds.

Blackmagic Disk Speed Test - 5GB
View attachment 1790537

TechTool Pro 14 - 3GB and 1GB
View attachment 1790540
View attachment 1790539

Connect to the M1 Mac mini via USB A (3.0), the read is ~360 MB/s, write is ~370MB/s. In comparison, when the enclosure/drive was connected to my 2012 Mac mini, the read and write rates were ~495MB/s to 520MB/s.

I’m not sure why the write is generally a little faster on the M1 — especially because with Blackmagic the write value fluctuated massively as the test looped.

In conclusion, M1 Macs can establish a 10Gb/s USB link, however, the performance is underwhelming and less than with Intel Macs.

Why? Either bugs/inefficiencies with Big Sur’s I/O overall or with Apple’s arm64 versions of the drivers.

P.S. If there was already a post verifying 10Gb/s, this can be a confirmation. :)
8b/10b is the encoding of data on the wire used by USB 3.0 (and many other things such as PCIe, SATA, and DisplayPort).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8b/10b_encoding

5Gbps * 8b/10b = 4 Gbps = 500 MB/s. So the fastest speed you can expect from USB 3.0 is less than 500 MB/s (approximately 460 MB/s)

Faster protocols such as Thunderbolt, PCIe 3.0, USB 3.1 gen 2, USB4, use more efficient encodings such as 64b/66b, 128b/130b, 128b/132b
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64b/66b_encoding

When testing maximum bandwidth, it's probably best to use a benchmark that returns the highest numbers - I believe AmorphousDiskMark.app does that.
For testing shared bandwidth, ATTO Disk Benchmark.app can test multiple devices at the same time without having to create a RAID 0.

As for USB to NVMe enclosures - I don't think there are any that can't do 1000 MB/s no matter how cheap. I have these ones:
https://plugable.com/products/usbc-nvme
https://www.newegg.ca/orico-tcm2-c3-bk-bp-enclosure/p/0VN-0003-001D8
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
OK i "solved" the "mystery" aka the typical Apple-patheticness by myself with an easy test:

I connected a dell dockinstation to the MacBook and the OWC to the dock and voila, the OWC reports with "up to 10Gb/s"

If I connect it again to the Macbook directly, I'm back to "limited to 5GB/s"

So here we are, the 4th Apple Silicon Generation and they couldn't care less so far to resolve this annoying bug.
That's the workaround I've found for my M1 Mac. Need to use a dock with an external USB controller. Some modern docks will tunnel the host's USB controller so such problems will still occur when plugged in to such docks.

It's the little things like this that made me lose interest in the Apple Silicon Macs, since Apple doesn't care enough to fix the bugs they've created.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.