Nice story. Now if you would only enlighten us as to what the hell any of that has to do with any of this? How does Harry Knowles falling for bogus rumors relate to Gizmodo, Mac Rumors et al reporting stuff about the iPhone 4 that's perfectly real?Folks, as a film critic, I can tell you that Harry Knowles and his penchant for jumping on every rumor that got slipped his way... absolutely reduced his credibility to ash. He got caught on more than one occasion reporting false rumors that were deliberately planted by anonymous tipsters just to set him up and expose him as a big fraud. He also further damaged his credibility by lavishing a screenplay with praise, which it happens was written by one of his contributors. He also took a hit for ignoring embargo rules we critics agree upon in order to get access to things the studios are under no obligation to grant us... and he is banned from 20th Century Fox screenings. He went very quickly from being a big powerbroker to a fat twerp whose back was crushed by 1200 pounds of his comic/movie memorabilia (pronounced: "hubris")... and in the interim, others have quickly taken his place.
Was the Gizmodo story about the leaked iPhone 4 a mere rumor that turned out to be bogus (I seem to remember pictures of the near-final product)? Are the reports of the iPhone antenna issue fabrications? Have CNN, NYT, WSJ, FT, ABC, FOX, BBC and CBS lost all credibilty now, seeing as they related the exact same story?
So, in summary, what you'd like to say is "be warned, bloggers: Don't do apples, look what happened to Harry Knowles when he did oranges". Mmmmkay...