Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Because its not necessary. Unless there are massive amounts of under 13 year old kids that are able to buy a $1000 phone, I'm pretty sure its the parents buying it and then handing it over to their kid. There are already tools in place when you set up the Apple account AND the phone, to lock it down and require parents ok to get apps. Parent your kids. Quit making these tech companies do it because people just want to sit there kid in front of tv, like they did years ago, or computer, or in today's world, tablet or phone.
Nice example that fits your narrative. Here's another -- a 17 year old with a job buys a used iphone or Android and gets a free email account and sets up their phone so they don't need their helicopter parents approval. Then what?
 
  • Like
Reactions: decypher44
Once Apple verifies a person's age (should only need to be done once), there's no reason for Apple to retain that data.

Who knows what an app developer will do with your data. If I had to verify my age, I'd rather do it one time with Apple than with each individual app developer. How many apps do you have? 12? 20? Would you want to give your personal info to that many different people?
So how would they prove they verified the person's age. Yep by storing all the information.
 
You don't have to show an ID in those instances because there's no law requiring that someone do so. However, there is now a law that requires Utahans to show an ID or some other form of age verification to Apple and Google.
so, how does this work for someone who resides in say Florida? just because Utah passed that law they will have to verify their age too? honest question, don't see that addressed in the article.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Night Spring
Having Apple and Google verify the age of app buyers is analogous to retailers verifying the age of liquor and cigarette buyers.

I'd imagine a lot of people would rather have Apple handle the verification data than the app developers.
I’d rather not have any verification because if you think law enforcement agencies often charged with state identification will not be using source IP and ID number correlations in their logs for potentially dubious to outright unconstitutional (but undetected) means then you haven’t been paying attention.
 
If the US government wants to enforce age verification, it should create a compulsory ID card designed to replace the fragile social security number. Unverified accounts would be assumed to be minors. Platform developers like Apple and Google could then tap into the government verification system and offer an API that developers can use.

There's user privacy implication with such system, and politicians pushing it as a voter ID.
 
So how would they prove they verified the person's age.
Apple could give everyone a
check.png
.

I hear those are popular. I mean, some people are paying $8/month for one.

If Apple can anonymize your credit card info for Apple Pay, then they can do the same for age verification


When you add a credit, debit, prepaid, or transit card (where available) to Apple Pay, information that you enter on your device is encrypted and sent to Apple servers. If you use the camera to enter the card information, the information is never saved on your device or photo library.

Apple decrypts the data, determines your card’s payment network, and re-encrypts the data with a key that only your payment network (or any providers authorized by your card issuer for provisioning and token services) can unlock.


so, how does this work for someone who resides in say Florida? just because Utah passed that law they will have to verify their age too? honest question, don't see that addressed in the article.
If someone resides in Florida, then why would the law apply to that person?
 
Last edited:
If someone resides in Florida, then why would the law apply to that person?
How does Apple determine that someone is not only a resident of Utah but also physically in Utah when doing the age verification thing? asking the question: are you a resident of Utah first?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Night Spring
Apple doesn’t allow porn or gore. What are these lawmakers protecting children from? Social media… maybe these regulation happy legislators should regulate social media itself instead of using it as an excuse for more police state like invasiveness that doesn’t actually address the harms of social media on children (and adults). I bet that’s not what Facebook brib…uh… lobbied them for.
 
How does Apple determine that someone is not only a resident of Utah but also physically in Utah when doing the age verification thing?
The same way Apple can determine that someone is not only a resident of the EU but also physically in (or outside of) the EU?

 
  • Like
Reactions: decypher44
You don't have to show an ID in those instances because there's no law requiring that someone do so. However, there is now a law that requires Utahans to show an ID or some other form of age verification to Apple and Google.

If this is too burdensome for Apple to handle, Apple could always allow sideloading. 😲 🤯 People who don't want to hand over their IDs could bypass the Apple App Store and Google Play store by getting their apps off the internet.

See how great sideloading can be?
Won’t fix anything as it’s a state law.
 
Hmmm, I think I would be uncomfortable providing Apple with my driver's license number, passport number or social security number. These are all very key numbers that could lead to identity theft if leaked. I do like the idea of protecting children but I don't see how to do that without other risks.
 
Having Apple and Google verify the age of app buyers is analogous to retailers verifying the age of liquor and cigarette buyers.

From what I understand Utah's law is more akin to retailers having to verify the age of anyone visiting the store regardless of what they might intend to buy.

While it definitely makes sense to verify the age of buyers of age-restricted items, it is pretty questionable to have to preemptively verify everyone's age.
 
I can't speak to how Apple's implementation works but there's nothing saying that Apple or Google would have to save ID document information either. It could scan the ID information, process it, create a unique token ID to confirm age, and then delete the ID information.
Do you really trust Google to delete all the id information aside from age? I don’t.

And even just the age can be used for targeted advertising or selling of user data. There’s no way to only say “I’m over 18” without handing over your exact age.

Edit: with id-based identification. This doesn’t seem to be what Apple is using (yet).
 
Apple has already done plenty. Now if the parent or parents are too lazy to use them, that's on them.

Get your child a flip phone with simple calling and nothing else if you can't be bothered to learn how to use the parental controls.

 
Does Walmart have to sell porn because they check IDs for beer?
Funny how you went straight to porn but okay. Plenty of other things that’s have been blocked due to “the children”. If I have to validate my age I should be able to consume anything anyone wants to publish.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.