There is too much at stake here for Apple.Already having issues with FaceID without sunglasses. Now combine bright light, or fluorescent lighting + sunglasses and see what happens.
For the people automatically and blindly defending Apple, this is the first reviewer to specifically mention bright light and fluorescent lighting causing problems with FaceID. He said it works fine in regular lighting, like the other reviewers.
For anyone that has had a Face Unlock phone before, we all know why it won't work as well TouchID (at least in the current iteration). The Dot projector may be a huge advance from previous technologies, but it is still susceptible to precisely what this guy suggests: interference from background lighting.
That’s why I don’t want to drop over a grand on a phone where the issues will just be partially corrected next year. The 8 design is 4 years old and is almost perfected at this point.
There is too much at stake here for Apple.
It is reasonable to assume that they would have done a decent amount of testing..
There is too much at stake here for Apple.
It is reasonable to assume that they would have done a decent amount of testing..
I agree but even on the premise that it will be perfect eventually, it is not clear to me that it is a real step forward..That's not to say that Face ID will be a failure, because it won't, and it will be a success in the long run.
I agree but even on the premise that it will be perfect eventually, it is not clear to me that it is a real step forward..
Almost feels like a necessary evil to get the full front screen!
It's not about dismissing the verge's opinion but we need more reviews to go to get a better understanding if this is a common issue or not.like all the bugs in iOS 11?
Apple scrambled to put the X together in time. There are hard deadlines in business and engineering, and we are already dealing with a November delivery instead of the traditional September delivery.
To say Apple has been having problems putting together the final product is an understatement.
The Verge was pretty reasonable in their criticism. It's something no one has brought up, and it is something Apple did not address specifically to my recollection. We heard about beards, glasses, etc., but all of those demonstrations were under nominal lighting conditions.
This is the first time anyone has brought up the problem of background lighting causing a problem with facial recognition (the underlying mechanism of which would be interference).
It's very interesting, and everyone should keep an eye on it. It is unreasonable to blindly brush it off because "Apple would have thought it out; it's only one person; etc."
I'm not saying it will definitely be a problem with all phones, but it is an interesting problem that can't be dismissed.
I think Apple milked the previous design for tooo long and had to make too many changes in one go - so they did scramble towards the endApple scrambled to put the X together in time
I look back at the other things they have introduced in the past and whilst tech they introduced improved over time, there haven't been giant screw-ups!It is unreasonable to blindly brush it off because "Apple would have thought it out; it's only one person; etc."
That is the beauty of new hardware elements! If someone can come up with brilliant applications using the notch hardware, Apple will stand vindicated!Face ID has loads of potential. And this technology is an improvement process as it moves forward from here. But the confidence I have in Apple, is they always strive to make their products better.
What my concern is will the battery life of X be better than that of iPhone 6 Plus, and even 8 plus. Hope there will be some test on it. I am also interested in the effect on battery usage if the function of true depth cameras are being disabled.
Face-Id didn't worked in bright sunlight