question for verizon ONLY, currently the iphone 5s does not have this feature, will the iphone 6 allow for simultaneous voice and LTE data while on LTE network (not VoLte)?
Need VoLTE for that on Verizon, or be connected to wifi. On the upside, Verizon is intending to roll out VoLTE in the not-too-distant future to the whole LTE network.
No. Voice over LTE is required for simultaneous voice and data on a CDMA network.
every android phone on verizon currently allows that WITHOUT being on VoLte
No. Voice over LTE is required for simultaneous voice and data on a CDMA network.
every android phone on verizon currently allows that WITHOUT being on VoLte
No, it isn't required. SVDO is what does this on the android phones. It requires another antenna which Apple has refused to add.
VoLTE will only work with other VoLTE users so it will be severely limited. They need to add SVDO support to the iPhone.
VoLTE will only work with other VoLTE users so it will be severely limited.
well, coming friday, when i get my iPhone, if it doesn't allow me to do that in the los angeles area, its going back to the store, unless los angeles already has VoLte?
well, coming friday, when i get my iPhone, if it doesn't allow me to do that in the los angeles area, its going back to the store.
So you still can't talk and surf on Verizon?
Heh. That $40 upgrade fee on AT&T is looking better and better...
Whats the point of talking and surfing at the same time if you can't even get a signal? At least that is how it is in California. AT&T's service still sucks out here. Meanwhile I can be out in the middle of the Mojave and still have a signal. The only time I didn't have a signal was going out to Death Valley a few years ago. Once I got there I had a 1x signal.
Sorry not everyone lives in your local area or tries to get service in the middle of the Mojave desert.
Saying AT&T service sucks is pointless cause verizon also sucks in many various locations and gets no signal with dead zones. Individual results will vary by location and no carrier is perfect everywhere.
But some of us do try to get a signal in the middle of the Mohave and getting that signal to some is more important than talk and surf.
Sorry not everyone lives in your local area or tries to get service in the middle of the Mojave desert.
Saying AT&T service sucks is pointless cause verizon also sucks in many various locations and gets no signal with dead zones. Individual results will vary by location and no carrier is perfect everywhere.
Oh I'm not saying AT&T Sucks nation wide, but the person I was replying too was saying that Verizon was inferior due to the fact that they can't talk and surf at the same time. In this case, AT&Ts coverage (at least in the Western portion of the US) is inferior to Verizon's. I hear its the exact opposite in the Eastern US; Verizon sucks and AT&T is the best.
Also, I do know a truck driver who is constantly going through the Mojave. He has 2 friends on AT&T and he's on Verizon. His friends constantly complain the call quality is sub-par to the quality on Verizon (they switched to get the 3GS in 2009) and there are more dead spots then Verizon. Not to say Verizon doesn't have them, but they have far, far less.
I wouldn't over generalize saying AT&T's coverage in the west part of the US is inferior and verizon sucks on the east coast.
IMO the both have very good networks and have great coverage in some areas and not so good at others.
Again, not all of us are truck drivers or travel throughout the country for a living. Most people figure out what works great for the locations that they frequent the most. If your just travel a few times a year for vacation and signal is not that great there you can live with it for a little while till you get back home.
I'd suggest everyone to try out carriers since most will let you test their network and return the device and cancel the contract in under 30 days. Then you will really know if it works for you or not. Taking other peoples word is not that accurate either.
well, coming friday, when i get my iPhone, if it doesn't allow me to do that in the los angeles area, its going back to the store, unless los angeles already has VoLte?
Oh I'm not saying AT&T Sucks nation wide, but the person I was replying too was saying that Verizon was inferior due to the fact that they can't talk and surf at the same time. In this case, AT&Ts coverage (at least in the Western portion of the US) is inferior to Verizon's. I hear its the exact opposite in the Eastern US; Verizon sucks and AT&T is the best.
Also, I do know a truck driver who is constantly going through the Mojave. He has 2 friends on AT&T and he's on Verizon. His friends constantly complain the call quality is sub-par to the quality on Verizon (they switched to get the 3GS in 2009) and there are more dead spots then Verizon. Not to say Verizon doesn't have them, but they have far, far less.
Not true. VoLTE will work for all voice calls.
You're mixing this up with HD Voice. Both ends need to be HD Voice capable to get the better sound quality, but the same isn't true for VoLTE.
http://www.verizonwireless.com/news...g-soon-to-verizon-wireless4g-lte-network.htmlHD Voice and Video Calling work only when both people are in the Verizon 4G LTE coverage area and are using VoLTE-enabled smartphones from Verizon. The calling experience customers know today remains the same if one Verizon customer uses a VoLTE-enabled phone and the other doesn’t, or if a customer with a Verizon smartphone calls a customer of another carrier or a landline phone.
http://www.cnet.com/news/verizon-readies-launch-of-nationwide-voice-over-lte-service/Currently, VoLTE calls cannot be made between different wireless operator networks. So even if a Verizon VoLTE-capable device is calling an AT&T VoLTE device, for now the two devices will not be able to use the technology for the call. Instead, the call will revert to the older circuit-switched technology.