and the monthly price includes a phone subsidy. this is why sprint and t-mo usually carry the crappy tier B and C phones. they cost less. people want the top tier iphone and andriod phones and are willing to pay for it
Huh? T-Mobile has the G2, the Samsung Vibrant, and the MyTouch 4G, not to mention both the Nexus One and the Nexus S. Sprint has the Epic and the EVO (which was hands-down the best Android phone you could buy until the Droid X, and even now it's a toss-up).
Sure, you hear more about the Droid ______ lineup, but that's due to marketing as much as anything else. Any of the phones I listed can hold their own (and in some cases beat) anything Verizon has to offer.
You can get top-tier phones on any network. The reason Sprint and T-Mobile are cheaper is that their networks (and in the case of Sprint, their support) suck.
The leaked photos make me believe that this imminent new handset is actually for T-Mobile USA.
The antenna configuration has been slightly tweaked, and yet there is still a slot for a SIM card (which would not have any use on a CDMA handset for Verizon or Sprint).
Not saying you're necessarily wrong, but the presence of a SIM slot could also mean this is a "world" phone, with both GSM and CDMA radios. You've been able to get these on Verizon for awhile, and they just released two new Android world phones (Droid 2 Global and Droid Pro). This would actually be a clever way for Apple to avoid fragmenting their hardware production, although I'm sure both VZW and AT&T would want to find some way to lock down phones to their network.
Fact is, the argument against a Verizon iPhone because it may not support simultaneous voice and data is the weakest argument one can make.
Exactly. This is a neat feature, but it's hard to imagine that it's vital for more than a small percentage of customers, and it's even harder to imagine that it would be a topic of widespread awareness were it not for its use in marketing.