Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
But here’s the thing:

1. No one asked you to line up
2. If you are a loyal customer you would know the history of Apple- which is the sim free version comes a few months later
3. You can get your ATT unlocked once it’s paid off- so I don’t see the big issue?
4. The unlocked X and locked X are exactly the same performance wise...so it’s not technically inferior...if anything you should be mad at ATT for not unlocking it...


Just my thoughts.
My IUP att phone is unlocked according to iTunes.
I plugged it in and did a restore and the congratulations your phone is unlocked popped up.
 
Yes, but the crap-stirrers need SOMETHING to latch onto, especially since FaceID works great and "the notch" is a non-issue...

Amen. My wife has a Galaxy S8, which uses the Qualcomm modem. I've yet to encounter a place where she had signal and I didn't. Just to satisfy my curiosity, I'll do a simultaneous speed test on both phones when I get home tonight and see if there's any difference.
 
The fanboys in here (by here I mean this forum) are ridiculous. Apple should not be putting out 2 versions - Qualcomm and Intel. Qualcomm is better, Macrumors even posted it as well. Its straight up stupid that Apple does it.

Single-sourcing a critical component of your supply chain is risky. What if the company goes under? What if the factory burns down, floods, etc? Redundancy is a good thing.

Setting disasters aside, single-sourcing can also be a capacity problem, where a single source can't necessarily provide enough parts on time. Many times we've seen different CPUs, screens, batteries, and now modems.

These reasons are perfectly normal, not "straight up stupid".
 
  • Like
Reactions: aristobrat
Yes, but the crap-stirrers need SOMETHING to latch onto, especially since FaceID works great and "the notch" is a non-issue...

He misread the study. It shows if you are in a low signal area, the Qualcomm model will let you watch HD video, while the Intel modem will only let you use iMessage.

If you are in an area with 5/5 bars if signal, the difference between models doesn't matter. But who is in that perfect scenario all the time?
[doublepost=1512594407][/doublepost]
No, it has been proven negligible.

60 something percent better is not negligible.

Cellular Insights said the difference is most noticeable in very weak signal conditions, in which the iPhone X with a Qualcomm modem experienced 67 percent faster LTE download speeds on average compared to the Intel model
 
Last edited:
I think what upsets me most is that not only did  not allow you to buy the unlocked Qualcomm from day one but they made you buy for your carrier

You could've bought the unlocked Verizon iPhone X (Qualcomm) outright in-store on launch day (or maybe a few days after 11/3) without having to give your credentials.
 
Follow the money trail on who paid for that "study"...

It is easy to reproduce the test independently. Take the Qualcomm model in an area with 1/5bars of signal strength and do a speed test. Repeat with Intel model with same 1/5 bars of signal strength.
 
You can do the same with the SIM-free phone, as it supports all the same GSM/LTE bands, in addition to CDMA. Either variant is a fine choice.
Yes, but I would imagine activating a SIM free phone takes account set up and programming in a brick and mortar store. I am no expert, by traveling abroad, it seems buying a SIM and putting money on it is the norm. We don't have that here AFAIK.
 
So let me get this straight, the iPhone X I waited in line for on launch day is actually inferior to the one they are starting to sell now that is unlocked?

Can't I have my AT&T phone be unlocked so I can port it to other carriers or use it on trips with foreign SIMs if I wish to?

I find this completely unacceptable for a company that prides itself with consumer friendliness, to start selling an upgrade a month later and make folks like me regret their $1200 purchase.

I will see if they accept a return of my carrier locked phone. If not, they've lost a loyal customer.

You didn’t do your homework. Doesn’t the unlocked phone always come out several weeks after the initial release?
 
It is easy to reproduce the test independently. Take the Qualcomm model in an area with 1/5bars of signal strength and do a speed test. Repeat with Intel model with same 1/5 bars of signal strength.

As it's presumably so easy, it's rather interesting that there doesn't appear to be any credible comparison showing exactly that.
 
So let me get this straight, the iPhone X I waited in line for on launch day is actually inferior to the one they are starting to sell now that is unlocked?

Can't I have my AT&T phone be unlocked so I can port it to other carriers or use it on trips with foreign SIMs if I wish to?

I find this completely unacceptable for a company that prides itself with consumer friendliness, to start selling an upgrade a month later and make folks like me regret their $1200 purchase.

I will see if they accept a return of my carrier locked phone. If not, they've lost a loyal customer.

Did you pay full price? If yes, then your AT&T phone is already unlocked. Seeing that you lined up on launch day, you could have actually purchased the unlocked Verizon phone (which is the same model as the unlocked model) without having to provide any account details and then popped in your AT&T card. Don't blame Apple for you not having done your research. You also could have waited for the unlocked SIM free version to go on sale too.
[doublepost=1512600332][/doublepost]
AT&T will not sell a phone outright. They require a purchase via Next and you can pay in full with the first billing date. As a result it is locked. You have to ask AT&T to unlock after the phone is free and clear.
Went through this with a 6S+, 7, 7+, and IPP.
Bought an SE unlocked from the Apple Store.

Just the way they (AT&T) do business.

Nonsense, you can purchase an AT&T phone from Apple with an option to pay full price. Go to the Apple store app and see for yourself
 
So let me get this straight, the iPhone X I waited in line for on launch day is actually inferior to the one they are starting to sell now that is unlocked?

Can't I have my AT&T phone be unlocked so I can port it to other carriers or use it on trips with foreign SIMs if I wish to?

I find this completely unacceptable for a company that prides itself with consumer friendliness, to start selling an upgrade a month later and make folks like me regret their $1200 purchase.

I will see if they accept a return of my carrier locked phone. If not, they've lost a loyal customer.

Heh, you’re new. We went thru this last year with the 7.
 
In my experience, cell network download speeds have a whole lot more to do with tower congestion than the capabilities of the phone. I doubt the differences between these two versions of the phone would be noticed in real-life at all, unless you happen to have both versions of the phone in your hands and start a download the very moment your carrier puts a fresh tower online, before everyone else piles on to it.
 
Did you pay full price? If yes, then your AT&T phone is already unlocked. Seeing that you lined up on launch day, you could have actually purchased the unlocked Verizon phone (which is the same model as the unlocked model) without having to provide any account details and then popped in your AT&T card. Don't blame Apple for you not having done your research. You also could have waited for the unlocked SIM free version to go on sale too.
[doublepost=1512600332][/doublepost]

Nonsense, you can purchase an AT&T phone from Apple with an option to pay full price. Go to the Apple store app and see for yourself

You didn't read what I wrote. I said you cannot buy one from AT&T. You can from an Apple Store. From AT&T in their store or online; no.
 
You didn't read what I wrote. I said you cannot buy one from AT&T. You can from an Apple Store. From AT&T in their store or online; no.

I just went on to AT&T.com and there is an option to purchase full retail price for the phone.
 

Attachments

  • B975DF3B-A15D-40F3-B8C9-740E14A583D4.png
    B975DF3B-A15D-40F3-B8C9-740E14A583D4.png
    742.8 KB · Views: 148
Yes, but I would imagine activating a SIM free phone takes account set up and programming in a brick and mortar store. I am no expert, by traveling abroad, it seems buying a SIM and putting money on it is the norm. We don't have that here AFAIK.

Activating a SIM-free phone is as easy as taking the SIM card out of your old phone and placing it in the new one, as long as you have an existing account. With regards to overseas traveling (I'm somewhat of an expert, as my wife and I travel abroad at least once a year), it's exactly as you described. You stop by a local wireless shop, pick up a preloaded SIM card, place it in your phone and you're good to go. They do, however, require the SIM card to be registered and will ask for your passport or driver license. I was able to get away without doing that in Ireland, by purchasing a Meteor (Irish wireless provider) SIM card on eBay and loading it up on their website with a credit card, and the UK, by purchasing a preloaded SIM card at a wireless stand at the Heathrow Airport. Spain and France, on the other hand, required registration.

Also, the EU recently passed a law that abolished roaming charges. For instance, purchasing a SIM card in Spain will allow you to use the service in any EU country at no additional charge.
 
So let me get this straight, the iPhone X I waited in line for on launch day is actually inferior to the one they are starting to sell now that is unlocked?

Can't I have my AT&T phone be unlocked so I can port it to other carriers or use it on trips with foreign SIMs if I wish to?

I find this completely unacceptable for a company that prides itself with consumer friendliness, to start selling an upgrade a month later and make folks like me regret their $1200 purchase.

I will see if they accept a return of my carrier locked phone. If not, they've lost a loyal customer.
This is why I always wait for the Sim-Free on every iPhone I buy.
[doublepost=1512610925][/doublepost]
If you paid full price for your AT&T iPhone X, it should be unlocked. Otherwise, you may have to call AT&T to unlock it, and they should since it is not being financed (if you paid full price) - they may require you to sync to iTunes and update firmware (iOS).
It may be unlocked, but because OP purchased an ATT X version, it may only work on GSM (ATT and T-Mobile). OP wants it to work on CDMA and GSM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charadis
Yes, but I would imagine activating a SIM free phone takes account set up and programming in a brick and mortar store. I am no expert, by traveling abroad, it seems buying a SIM and putting money on it is the norm. We don't have that here AFAIK.
If you have an active SIM you just insert it into the phone and it will activate. Carrier activation is mostly a scam. All it does is transfer your account to a new SIM. No need to do that.
 
Activating a SIM-free phone is as easy as taking the SIM card out of your old phone and placing it in the new one, as long as you have an existing account. With regards to overseas traveling (I'm somewhat of an expert, as my wife and I travel abroad at least once a year), it's exactly as you described. You stop by a local wireless shop, pick up a preloaded SIM card, place it in your phone and you're good to go. They do, however, require the SIM card to be registered and will ask for your passport or driver license. I was able to get away without doing that in Ireland, by purchasing a Meteor (Irish wireless provider) SIM card on eBay and loading it up on their website with a credit card, and the UK, by purchasing a preloaded SIM card at a wireless stand at the Heathrow Airport. Spain and France, on the other hand, required registration.

Also, the EU recently passed a law that abolished roaming charges. For instance, purchasing a SIM card in Spain will allow you to use the service in any EU country at no additional charge.

Depends on where you go. Any on the Asian countries that I’ve traveled to (and I’m now retired and moved to the Philippines) don’t require all that. Simply buy a SIM card. Pop it in the phone. Add some load (either eload or a load card) and you’re good to go.
 
The fanboys in here (by here I mean this forum) are ridiculous. Apple should not be putting out 2 versions - Qualcomm and Intel. Qualcomm is better, Macrumors even posted it as well. Its straight up stupid that Apple does it.

read this:
https://www.digitaltrends.com/business/apple-vs-qualcomm-news/


----
pretty sure the reason any new iPhone has Qualcomm in there is because it's necessary for certain networks..
otherwise, Apple wouldn't be putting out 2 versions.. it would be all Intel.

..and this will likely be the case next year or 2019
 
Android manufacturers do the exact same thing. They've been giving the world Exynos processors for year that test out better than the Qualcomm crap that we receive in the US. You can buy carrier Androids or you can buy them unlocked usually after the launch. Everyone does this!
Processors, I'm talking about the modem. Apple removed antennas from Qualcomm to match Intel.

Think like TSMC VS Samsung.

It's just frustrating that the X16 can get 4x4 MIMO/LAA It just can't in the iPhone because Apple crippled it to match Intels XMM7480. It's a less obvious difference this year compared with the iPhone 7/7 Plus but it's still there. Especially in high dBm (Low signal).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raist3001
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.