too bad eyesight has nothing to do with improving the wearers vision
it would be cool if vison pro did have capability to improve wearers actual vision
it would be cool if vison pro did have capability to improve wearers actual vision
Apple wants Vision Pro to be something you can wear around other people. You can see them and they can see you (your eyes) when you're seeing them. The better Apple can make this feature, the more acceptable it will be to wear headsets. I know there are people who think looking like a three-eyed robot is actually better and that it's nobody's business if you're looking at them while you're talking to them, but it's the direction Apple chose to go.too bad eyesight has nothing to do with improving the wearers vision
it would be cool if vison pro did have capability to improve wearers actual vision
Honestly most new Apple products (or tech products in general really) suffer from that.VP is one of those things where people who don't want it feel compelled to post how much they don't want it. They gleefully reach for anything to be an indication that the product is a failure. Like they feel personally insulted by an inanimate object.
The front screen is too dim and yet not a regular OLED, the front glass is too glossy, and I dont see the point of having a front screen.
I read this story because I have a Vision Pro and am understandably interested in the next software release. I’m surprised to see the posts from people who don’t own one or have no intention of buying one.
It does NOT. It's just a useless feature that Apple added. Design flaw.and this has to do with visionOS 1.1 how?
They are creepy and campy. Very lame. Also, the only people I know that use them are my elderly in-laws.Memoji should be a perfect fit for the AVP: they aren't creepy, and they're easy to do. They could be made automatically and then easily tweaked by the user; many people spent a bit of time making their Memojis on their iPhones in the first place.
That actually helps put things in context. Good observation!Honestly most new Apple products (or tech products in general really) suffer from that.
People thought the iPad was nothing more than a giant phone and cheered for its “inevitable” failure from day one. I distinctly remember this forum flooded with people declaring the Apple Watch a flop a decade ago (although the watchOS 1 software was pretty abysmal back then). AirPods? Overpriced garbage that looks hideous in your ears and everyone will lose them on day one. Even if you go back to the AirTags launch, you’ll see posters who were irrationally *angry* over the launch of an item finder and were deeply offended that Apple dared release such a product that insulted their eyeballs.
I used to say “nobody hates Apple products more than Apple fans” and this website certainly makes a case for that statement!
He doesn’t seem to have spent any real time actually using the AVP beyond what it took to set it up. He’s making silly comparisons just for the “likes” from what I can tell. One quick comparison he makes is multiple monitors @ work, but he doesn’t mention AVP has 3D apps you can manipulate and it will all travel with you on a plane... in Fruit Ninja he's making wild movements outside of where the AVP follows hands and complaining that the AVP can’t keep up. Fruit Ninja works great & is fun after a months usage, 3 to 7 hours a day. I’m not getting paid to say I love my AVP. That guy is getting paid to pander to AVP haters. 🤷That’s fair but I’m curious is he exaggerating how bad the gameplay is?
Jump to 6:30
Always good to have another perspective.He doesn’t seem to have spent any real time actually using the AVP beyond what it took to set it up. He’s making silly comparisons just for the “likes” from what I can tell. One quick comparison he makes is multiple monitors @ work, but he doesn’t mention AVP has 3D apps you can manipulate and it will all travel with you on a plane... in Fruit Ninja he's making wild movements outside of where the AVP follows hands and complaining that the AVP can’t keep up. Fruit Ninja works great & is fun after a months usage, 3 to 7 hours a day. I’m not getting paid to say I love my AVP. That guy is getting paid to pander to AVP haters. 🤷
I've bought all three. Next.You’ve never bought a PC running windows, a home appliance, or a car have you?
Are the youth using Personas and AVPs?They are creepy and campy. Very lame. Also, the only people I know that use them are my elderly in-laws.
"Apple noticed that they" could try to "do better" but clearly aren't there yet.AVP is probably the reason why Memojis exist: I am sure they were Apple's plan for video conferencing. And then Apple noticed (thought) that they can do better - simulate photorealistic humans.
It does NOT. It's just a useless feature that Apple added. Design flaw.
This is a news thread, not VisionOS itself. I guess you never tried it in person.wonderful. why not start a thread about all the design flaws you have personal experience with. this thread is about visionOS.
This is a news thread, not VisionOS itself. I guess you never tried it in person.
And I said, those improvements are useless as it's a hardware's problem, not a software. Eyesight, can NOT be improve because of the panel they used. Do you still not get it?Tried what?
Read the title?
Vision Pro Personas and EyeSight Improving With visionOS 1.1
Why yes I have thanks. Or did you mean try an AVP? Have to admit I’ve never been in for a demo. I own one. Hence why I read the article and looked to the comments for on topic discussion. It’s in the rules.
And I said, those improvements are useless as it's a hardware's problem, not a software. Eyesight, can NOT be improve because of the panel they used. Do you still not get it?
Oh yes, I even owned it before. Eyesight doesn't really serve its purpose and it's just a waste of hardware by putting a screen and glass in front of it. What do you even get from it when others only see your eyes or colors? It's just a useless feature.have you ever seen one personally? After visionOS1.1. Beta is fine If that’s what you’ve seen. It’s what I run. my family says eyesight works fine. But okay it’s hardware.
Oh yes, I even owned it before. Eyesight doesn't really serve its purpose and it's just a waste of hardware by putting a screen and glass in front of it. What do you even get from it when others only see your eyes or colors? It's just a useless feature.
You just proven my point. Why do you keep ignoring the fact for? What a waste of time.Look even before the AVP was released you were putting down the front screen… so at least you are consistent.
Jan 20 “Clearly, I dont see the point of adding a front display and glass for Vision Pro. They just adding more front weights while it barely serves its purpose.”
But okay, I disagree. It’s miles ahead of its competitors with nothing at all but a blank wall.
I hear you, but I feel that yours is simply a general reaction to VR/AR. Apple is entering this realm big time. You may disagree with the technology direction, but it is happening whether you like it or not.View attachment 2355521
This image for this product triggers a visceral, almost disgusted reaction in me. It's unprecedented in Apple's lineup, strikingly odd and inhuman. It's shocking that such an image comes from the world's top marketing department and not from a horror-themed episode of Black Mirror.
I think it’s an extremely important feature and allows a meaningful connection with those around you. Yes, it looks so weird at first, but people get used to it and it is so important to not make you isolated from those around you.Oh yes, I even owned it before. Eyesight doesn't really serve its purpose and it's just a waste of hardware by putting a screen and glass in front of it. What do you even get from it when others only see your eyes or colors? It's just a useless feature.
Then your expectations are suspect.I've bought all three. Next.