Because Microsoft does not license Windows 10 for ARM except for OEM use in devices such as the Surface Pro X. As you know, Windows 10 for ARM is not the same as Windows 10 on X86, there are some fairly serious limitations right now in what you can and can't run on it. But until they allow you to purchase a non-OEM copy, you're out of luck.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
VMware Fusion 12 Now Available With macOS Big Sur Support and More
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Because Microsoft does not license Windows 10 for ARM except for OEM use in devices such as the Surface Pro X. As you know, Windows 10 for ARM is not the same as Windows 10 on X86, there are some fairly serious limitations right now in what you can and can't run on it. But until they allow you to purchase a non-OEM copy, you're out of luck.
Nice
Wouldn't you rather have a Nvidia RTX 30 Series and a gaming PC for such demanding use or is your Bootcamp eGPU setup fast enough for 4K? Only two days til RTX 30 series available.Back to VMware Fusion 12. Just imported my Fusion 10 VM. Windows needed to reactivate - but they've made it much less hassle. In settings - activation let Windows diagnose activation and select you've changed your hardware. It re-activated without having to call Windows support. I thought the free version might be some horribly crippled version of Fusion but it seems to have all the bells and whistles of the previous non-pro version. Christmas early this year
You've never needed to deploy an OVF file (& probably don't even know what they are). Vbox doesn't manage my ESXi hosts: creating/starting/stopping/deteting VMs, connecting to the consoles, uploading/downloading VMs, Connecting a VM's DVD drive to an Iso on my Mac, etc. Nor is VBox a supported environment for most of the VMs I need to run: F5, Checkpoint, Fortinet, etc. VBox is a toy. Fusion is a tool used for work.
Ah - sorry, misunderstood. It "should" be able to run Windows Arm but as you might have seen from other responses in the thread, Windows Arm is not as mature as x86, there aren't a lot of Windows Arm programs besides Office, etc. It might require a compile or some tweaks to run on AS - probably won't straight out of the box early on (based on what I've been able to read/understand).
FYI,
The link you mentioned is taking me to a page to download Horizon:
Attachments
Yep. I was logged into my account when I opened that link. Still went to the Horizon page.
Continue reading the thread beyond those posts and it should clarify things for you. A different link was posted that takes you to the correct website.
I use Fusion Pro 11 at work - great bit of software and integrates with vSphere nicely. Thought I'd use this to bring my home machine up to Fusion 11 standard, however the Fusion 12 license key for Player/free does not activate 11.5.6 at all. I guess a paid key does. You cannot use downgrade rights either as the free "perpetual trial" key doesn't appear in the licensing portal.
Last edited:
I was curious, can VMware Fusion Pro, and player coexist ? I was thinking about comparing the two side by side, even though I've settled on Pro as my official copy.
You cannot use downgrade rights either as the free "perpetual trial" key doesn't appear in the licensing portal either.
Yeah I hope they fix this. When you register for a free license you should get an email with a link that takes you to your license key.
If you can, you'd probably be better off with a new VM. Years back I migrated a Parallels Win7 VM to Fusion and had a poor experience for a while. When I installed a clean Windows under Fusion all my issues dissapeared. I blame Parrallel drivers that didn't uninstall cleanly.
Great to see the product manager is following this thread! Thank you. Hope you'll respond to more questions. I've been a Fusion user for more than ten years. It's been a bit expensive for personal use, but I had Windows-only apps I wanted to run, and I've been pretty happy .There is no feature missing in Player that I have ever cared about, even the couple of times where I've needed Windows for a consulting project. So I'm glad to see the Free player license for people like me (and, yeah, I'll pay if I end up using it for work).
But ... it looks like Fusion 12 Player (whether you pay for the commercial license or not) comes with zero support. You can't even access the forums? Is this true? If this is the case, I'm likely to stick with 11.5.
It's the same actual application, distinguished only by the license. I doubt you can have the 2 on one computer.
Such is the destiny of anything Oracle touches. Can't wait to see how quickly they destroy TikTok.
Ok, wasn't sure. I remember VMware used to have an app named VMWare Player, wasn't sure if the player portion was the same for the mac.. Sounds like it's all done in licensing these days with one app bundle.
The ARM version of Windows is not really Windows, it shouldn't even be called that. When people say they need Windows, they mean the x64 version of Windows, not the ARM version, which is completely gimped and doesn't run any of the modern high performance applications. Only the .NET applications would run correctly on ARM, and some very basic 32-bit apps. Forget about any professional software on the ARM version of Windows.
Hey Mike, can I run a 32-bit macOS like Mojave or earlier using VMware Fusion? For clarification, I would be installing Fusion on a Mac running Catalina. I'm looking for a solution to run 32-bit apps after I upgrade to Catalina. I'm searching everywhere for answer, so thanks in advance!
vmware fusion could do a better job at assigning static IP's ... and auto-close VM windows upon OS GUEST shutdown ... but, the CPU and MAMORY limitations in parallels makes it worth the switch
I agree with PAR->VMF migration ... its not a clean as id like to see it
not happy however with the upgrade costs ($99 vs. P's $49)
I agree with PAR->VMF migration ... its not a clean as id like to see it
not happy however with the upgrade costs ($99 vs. P's $49)
These are all software issues that Microsoft is working on. They're not forever issues. You can bet they'll be catching up to Rosetta 2 on performance. And they're already said x86-64 will be arriving very soon. But x86-64 was also not widely adopted on Windows.
Don't assume Microsoft is just going to sit on their hands and never improve Windows on ARM. Especially as ARM takes off and Nvidia starts making ARM PCs.
They will do virtualisation and container support but it will be ARM on ARM - not x86 on ARM.
Virtualisation isn't just to run x86 windows software; it is useful for ARM as well for application/OS development, web development (run linux web server, etc. as demonstrated in WWDC20, etc.).
Just because it won't run x86 doesn't make a huge amount of difference to a lot of people. I know I'll still have use for VMware or some other VM package on an ARM Mac with no x86 support.