Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
VMware Fusion for M1 Macs Now Available as Private Tech Preview
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Cloud is only useful if you can connect to it.... not a criticism aimed directly at you, but people seem to forget this when spouting the cloud as the answer to everything.
This is good news but they need to put more effort into making their VMWare Tools drivers available for Windows ARM. Parallels Tools works already with Windows ARM.
I like the M1 machines and I have an M1 Air, but because VMWare still isn't quite there yet I think I will hand that machine off to my spouse and stick with my MBP 16 for now. I don't really want to pay what Parallels is asking for a subscription, and even though I like using QEMU+KVM on Linux hosts, UTM just isn't ready for primetime yet.
I like the M1 machines and I have an M1 Air, but because VMWare still isn't quite there yet I think I will hand that machine off to my spouse and stick with my MBP 16 for now. I don't really want to pay what Parallels is asking for a subscription, and even though I like using QEMU+KVM on Linux hosts, UTM just isn't ready for primetime yet.
Even though it is limited, I am glad it is out there as another VM enviroment for the future. On the PC side a lot used Linux for engineering projects rather than windows at work. Perhaps as other ARM based OS's become more readily available the usefulness of this VMware product will grow for M1 Macs.
Apple knew this was a consequence of moving to Apple Silicon. However, staying with x86/x64 was not viable long term and did not fall in line with Apple’s goals. Keeping Intel CPUs is the trap that MS fell into and now may never be able to extract itself out of.
The. You are going to make sure you have a decent Intel-based Mac of some kind on your desk for the foreseeable future. It is what it is.
Well, yeah, just saying that this transition kills a very useful feature for many "pro-sumers".
Regular Windows on Apple Silicon won’t happen. Not now, not ever. Waiting for M11 won’t help that.
Exactly the same here! Back in around 2010 I was doing heavy Windows server based development and ended up switching to a Lenovo thinkpad so I could get 32GB of RAM and run multi-VM setups in Fusion. By the time Apple finally got around to giving us 32GB machines several years later, everything had gone cloud and/or open source non-proprietary software which overall is probably better but I can certainly get by with less now...in fact I am on a base MBA M1 at the moment until the new MBPs arrive. My own need to dive into an actual Windows VM gets less and less and I can easily connect to a remote one at home or in Azure if needed.
I could switch entirely to MacOS (and IOS/IPadOS) - only a few odds and ends that would be a nuisance but not a major issue. Despite having hardly used MacOS until the past few months.
Partner, despite her being a very long-term Mac user, has one single program that needs Windows. The people who wrote that seem to have cloth ears with respect to any MacOS version. And they even require you to use a Windows version of Corel Draw - not compatible with the Mac version.
Worse still, they are implementing a weird (and probably wholly unnecessary) wifi SD card system which is a hardware device. That needs to be plugged into a Windows machine to be set up. And it looks as if it is a mandatory part of the set-up. So cloud Windows quite likely not an option.
Complete pain. Who is at fault? I point my finger at the program developers/owners. They have been asked for a MacOS version for years but ignore the requests. Many users are like partner, Mac users who currently use Fusion or Parallels (though not actually supported for the app, it does seem to work).
Partner, despite her being a very long-term Mac user, has one single program that needs Windows. The people who wrote that seem to have cloth ears with respect to any MacOS version. And they even require you to use a Windows version of Corel Draw - not compatible with the Mac version.
Worse still, they are implementing a weird (and probably wholly unnecessary) wifi SD card system which is a hardware device. That needs to be plugged into a Windows machine to be set up. And it looks as if it is a mandatory part of the set-up. So cloud Windows quite likely not an option.
Complete pain. Who is at fault? I point my finger at the program developers/owners. They have been asked for a MacOS version for years but ignore the requests. Many users are like partner, Mac users who currently use Fusion or Parallels (though not actually supported for the app, it does seem to work).
It's looking more and more likely that I've purchased my last (personal) Mac, unfortunately. I could live without x86 backwards compatibility (although I'd lose access to some beloved old games); but too much of my wife's sewing software is Windows only. It works just fine on our existing 2017 iMac, but once that dies I'll have to come up with an x86-based replacement.
I won't personally be moving my primary OS to Windows... Linux Mint is certainly ready for prime-time. I'll probably try to get my wife to try it as well, but she may just say "screw it, just put me on Windows".
I won't personally be moving my primary OS to Windows... Linux Mint is certainly ready for prime-time. I'll probably try to get my wife to try it as well, but she may just say "screw it, just put me on Windows".
Last edited:
No - I get it, and I'm not against subscriptions - I have a bunch of them, and I agree that developers need to eat. I just need to be selective about which ones I need. It is all to easy to find yourself with $hundreds each month in subscriptions I don't need.
Windows365 is great, but the pricing doesn't make sense for my needs. If I used it everyday it would be good value and a no brainer. To use it to spin up a VM every other month for 15 minutes isn't cost effective for my purposes.
If you're hellbent on staying with Mac hardware, you might see if - rather than running the entire Windows OS - the software you want/need will run on Codeweaver's Crossover (Wine) platform.
Vmware really dragged their feet on this one, and they seem to be on their high horse when it comes to not supporting windows 10. parallels already supports m1 macs with official support for windows. Yes i understand windows does not officially support m1 and vmware is getting behind that stance but still kinda seems like vmware just doesnt care anymore on that aspect on their software.
Well, sure, if you want some random machine that came out five years after the Apple II.you must be young... a lot of us have the Commodore 64 for this.
Haha! Those things sure were ahead of their time. I started on TRSDOS and a cassette "tape drive", baby.you must be young... a lot of us have the Commodore 64 for this.
Thank goodness for those 80K floppy disks. Actually it started with punched cards on a high school mini computer.
Intel VMWare fusion is free for non-business use so I'm curious what the ARM variation license model will be.
The M1 strategy from Apple is bascially alianating all their customer who rely on x86 VMs to do their job … I got a x86 mini (2020) and a work 15” MBP. the work mac will be a ubuntu notebook next time around, I’m not sure if I’ll just keep the mini until it dies, or just give in an get an M1 at some point as I need Adobe … (there is no alternative for me).
I do have both brand new Intel Mac laptop and several real Dells. I travel with a Mac and it is a bit hard to carry my towers on the plane.
In addition, I am moving to linux for most everything new now. Apple has made macOS not really usable for real hard core computing needs, Apple devices are just toys. Something my SAP friends told me years ago and I failed to listen.