Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As a long-time Parallels customer — they were the first and I bought their software as soon as it came out — I long looked over at VMWare’s longer times between paid updates with envy. Now it seems I was premature to move over though it cost less than a Parallels update. They are very similar in use though some features are different. VirtualBox may be fine and it's worth a try. Otherwise I think VMWare still has an edge in bug-freedom and slightly slower pace of paid updates, while Parallels is slightly easier to use. Performance seems to depend on what you're doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rbgaynor and iMerik
What a great pissing contest between the two firms... I'll just stick to BootCamp.
 
Oh joy, that's the annual VMWare tax to pay.

Roll up, roll up, roll up, get your free operating system here. And VMWare will then take your money for a minimal updates.
 
I
Do any of these apps (Parallels, Fusion or Virtual Box) allow you to upgrade an existing installation of Windows 8.1 to Windows 10 using the Microsoft upgrade process? Can anyone confirm from their own experience?

The .VDMK image of Windows 8.1 I've got and boot directly into does not allow that. The installation fails saying that Windows cannot upgraded when installed into image.
I updated my Windows 8.1 to Windows 10 using parallels without any problem.
 
I've opted out of Windows completely. I wish my company would do the same.
I am sitting here at work updating my windows machine with 40 updates for whatever. I am so happy that I rarely think about these things at home which is 99% microsoft free (my wife refuses to get off of MS-office).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gymgenius
I've looked over VMWare's website. Every version of Fusion for the last 3 years has had almost the same marketing page "Greater efficiency!" "Increased performance" blah blah, but they offer no numbers. It seems like puffing to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: greenvomit8
If Apple would just buy/build a decent modeling/cad/cam package and offer it along with its pro creative suite... entire industries could finally begin to untether themselves from windows.

or ship a version on every computer, and enable an entire generation to learn and adopt it with their 3d printers...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skoal
Fusion has worked flawlessly for me since the beginning and I have relied on it heavily
I understand Bootcamp is cool for many and Virtual Box can be an option
But I run a VM of Windows 10, Windows 8.1 and Windows 7 along with Unbuntu, sometimes all at the same time
Fusion handled the installs painlessly and the performance has been great

No, I'm not thrilled with the yearly upgrade costs, but there is more to consider than just the compatibility with Windows 10
(My Fusion 7 has run Windows 10 without issue)
The upgrades also have to ensure compatibility with OS X too
Not to mention drivers, networks, devices, printers, etc.

Yes, it is an annoyance, but it is how companies make money and how the continue to provide good products
Besides, I would spend more on a nice dinner with my wife than the cost of this upgrade

The product works and works well and I will continue to use it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skoal and InfoTime
What is better, Fusion 8 or Parallels 11?
It's (was?) usually like this:
• Parallels is slightly faster (slightly more responsive, better 3D acceleration) and "feels" overal better as a Mac - app, where the Windows guest OS is well integrated.
• VMware has more "cross-platform" support as VMware is huge in the Server and Desktop virtual machine markets and "feels" better supported running other OSses besides Windows as guest-OS (Linux, and fun stuff like OPENSTEP, Rhapsody...)

If I had to choose between the two (which I don't... I actually use both...lol) it'll be Parallels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xSeaside
Lol, where? In Africa?

Most ISPs in the U.S. have data caps but they're usually quite generous and are not enforced unless you go way over or go over month after month. I got a warning from my provider (Cox) one month when I went over. I was trying to upgrade Windows - from 7 to 8 - on one of my computers but there was a bug in the upgrade process so it ended up re-downloading the OS over and over. I started the process in the evening, left it running overnight, and went to work before I could check the progress so it downloaded Windows over and over for 24 hours before I had time to see what it was doing and stop it. So that was about 200 GB in a day plus I re-downloaded a lot of games through Steam etc. so I went over the 250GB cap. Cox sent me an email saying I went over and should check to make sure I didn't have a virus (I did, it was called Windows); or, if I needed more data, I should consider switching to a business plan.

A lot of other countries have lower data caps.
 
Microsoft wants to make you Knternet connect part of a Torrent sharing botnet! You have to Opt-Out the Network panel settings.

You know, even having a remote understanding of what a botnet is would be great before you go using the word like this. Microsoft is not connecting you to a "botnet" and thinking so is just ignorant. They want to use you to distribute updates, if you don't like that don't enable it or don't use windows period. Don't spread stupidity like "botnet omg haxorss!!", it isn't even remotely correct. I hate Windows 10 but your comment was just FUD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jedifaka
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.