Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
From what I have seen so far, this is like asking "What is better, PS4 or Xbox One?" ;) This kind of question can trigger a holy war.

Hahaha, exactly.

If I recall, at the time I made my initial purchase, Parallels had _just_ taken the lead feature-wise, I did a trial install, it worked perfectly, the price was the same (both had some kind of special offer). That was it, I was committed to Parallels. That being said, I do occasionally review the features, performance, pricing, etc., between the two, and I just haven't seen a reason to switch since Parallels continues to run extremely well for me.

In terms of ongoing cost, I recently wrote this in another thread:

I skip every other version of PD (went from PD8 to PD10) as the version released for the current OSX works for the next major release. When I do update, I usually score a discounted version for $39 (there's about an offer a week), or an upgrade/full in a bundle that effectively costs $30-35.

So at least for me, for the last few years, I've spent about $40/2-years on PD after my initial purchase (which itself was discounted).

Side note: We find the Wii-U is the most fun :D

Comcast does.

Not in Houston. We hit a terabyte a month and not one warning.

At one point there was a documented cap, but it seems like a bit of a crap shoot whether or not it got enforced (and it seemed to vary based on location). It seems like I recall them loosening up the consumer service limits[?]

We're on Biz Class so no cap (specifically documented as part of the Biz Services agreement).
 
So does emulating Windows 10 on your Mac lets Microsoft monitor, steal and sell your files, contacts and communications?
 
Betamax was better than VHS
HD-DVD was better than Blu-Ray

Just saying ;)
Bad comparison because although both of those products were better, they weren't outselling their competitor, unlike PS4 which is greatly whopping the Xbox One. So it's a win win for Sony and it's customers, better machine and better seller. :)
 
Does anybody know if i'st possible to install windows 7 on VMware (or Parallels) and then upgrade it to windows 10 on a newer mac which doesn't allow bootcamp windows 7 installation?
Got a copy of windows 7 and don't want to pay for windows 10 if I don't have to.
 
I already have Fusion 7 running Win10 and it seems to work fine. I guess VMWare needs a steady stream of income like everyone else....
I haven't tested it in Fusion 7 yet, but in VMWare Workstation 11 on the PC, Unity view doesn't work correctly with Win10 guests due to the way desktop rendering was changed. I assume it won't work in Fusion 7 either.
 
Does anybody know if i'st possible to install windows 7 on VMware (or Parallels) and then upgrade it to windows 10 on a newer mac which doesn't allow bootcamp windows 7 installation?
Got a copy of windows 7 and don't want to pay for windows 10 if I don't have to.

I would think that Windows running a VM would totally bypass any Bootcamp restrictions - though if you're running your VM from a Bootcamp install (vs. a VHD), that creates an interesting conundrum :D
 
And STILL no tabs, something that Workstation has had for years.

Look at the screenshot - lots of individual windows all over the place. With Workstation you can switch simply between each tab and have all your virtual machines under one window.

To me, this is still a major usability issue and I cannot understand why it has not been incorporated. It would be a 'true' additional feature worth paying an upgrade cost for.
 
I'm getting a bit annoyed with VMware and Parallels using the yearly OS X release cycle as an excuse to push very expensive updates witch are marginally better. But hey, it's mostly companies who buy these things with enough cash to burn. They're definitely making good use of that.
I got quite annoyed by it last year when I had to cough up another $50 to upgrade to VMware 7 after paying for 6 and 5 and 4 and perhaps even 3... So I jumped ship and switched to VirtualBox, and I've been quite happy ever since. Moving my VMs to VB was straight forward and even though I run RDBMS', ETL and BI tools on it, it works just fine. I'd say moving to VirtualBox was almost as liberating as switching to Mac!
 
This will date me. I was in a pinch and used Virtual PC (before it was Microsoft Owned) on a Titanium G4 Powerbook to install and run a Novell Netware server for some time. Good times.

I ran VirtualPC on a 12" PowerBook. Talk about dog slow but it did save my bacon in a customer presentation once when my corporate Dell refused to cooperate.
 
The CCC upgrade for El Capitan will be free to current registered owners of CCC.

I don't expect it to be free. If I decide to upgrade my OS and if that OS has changes that make it necessary that 3rd party developers have to spend time adjusting their software to be compatible with the new OS or use new OS features, then those developers deserve to be rewarded for their work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skoal
Wait what, its 2015 and some ISPs still have bandwidth limit, i thought that was only on mobile networks :|

Go to your ISP Splash page and sign in with with your account password (usually your ISP web mail username/password) and look at your account. It should be buried in the settings somewhere in there.
 
Last edited:
I would think that Windows running a VM would totally bypass any Bootcamp restrictions - though if you're running your VM from a Bootcamp install (vs. a VHD), that creates an interesting conundrum :D
I don't have windows currently installed at all. I want to try windows 10 but would rather not pay for it as I have a copy of windows 7. since I can't install windows 7 via bootcamp the only option seems to be to install it via VMware or Parallels and then upgrade that install to windows 10. I assume I can then take advantage of the free upgrade option. I just want to make sure that this is possible before going through all the trouble.
 
Wait what, its 2015 and some ISPs still have bandwidth limit, i thought that was only on mobile networks :|

Limitations are definitely real and in the US! I have used AT&T uVerse for two years. Recently I upgraded my service to get higher speed and discovered there is a limit per month imposed on uVerse internet service subscribers with a stiff additional fee if the limit is breached. In looking thru the AT&T web site I also saw it is possible for a subscriber to uVerse TV and internet service to register their account so the data consumed by ip TV does not count against the monthly uVerse internet limits.

Interesting to note:this limitation was not disclosed to me by AT&T when I upgraded my service. I do not know if there was a monthly uVerse internet data limit previously.

Always Testing & Taking more from the consumer that they fail to inform You would have thought they would learn their lesson based on fines for throttling cell phone users with grandfathered unlimited data plans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: satcomer
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.