Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As I've been saying for years, ever since the rumors of an Apple Car first surfaced, Apple would be crazy to build and sell an automobile. If Apple did so, despite how good their electric car might be, they would suddenly be competing for sales with every other car manufacturer out there, and those companies would now have a disincentive to embrace Apple software in their vehicles.

Apple can generate far more revenue with their enhanced CarPlay approach, designing software that every other automobile manufacturer out there can integrate into their own vehicles, while Apple enhances the utility of owning an iPhone.
Depends if Apple position themselves as low volume high end premium manufacturer. If you need to spend 6 figures to get into an apple car would that worry Peugeot?

Don’t forget that Apple’s own figures suggest that a majority of people won’t consider a car without CarPlay. What if Apple start by making that a unique selling point over Tesla?
 
As I've been saying for years, ever since the rumors of an Apple Car first surfaced, Apple would be crazy to build and sell an automobile. If Apple did so, despite how good their electric car might be, they would suddenly be competing for sales with every other car manufacturer out there, and those companies would now have a disincentive to embrace Apple software in their vehicles.

Apple can generate far more revenue with their enhanced CarPlay approach, designing software that every other automobile manufacturer out there can integrate into their own vehicles, while Apple enhances the utility of owning an iPhone.

Apple has more money than 'god', according to many people. I get the sarcasm, but they (Apple) need to do something with that money. Coming up with a car seems the perfect direction to spend money on. Making a car from a new-ish in this case Apple would be like Tesla popping a car on the world. Apple has just as much of a right to release a car as they did. I think an Apple Car would be interesting. I'd actually consider one if it fixes the issues I see in the other alternatives. Seriously. I don't want a Tesla, and the Ford Mustang has issues with parts, etc, and the truck, apparently, can't be resold, which sounds insane but...

Who knows, Apple could fall on their face with this, but they have the money to do it. They could also be The Next Big Thing, and sell out for eternity. Let them do it...
 
Apple has more money than 'god', according to many people. I get the sarcasm, but they (Apple) need to do something with that money. Coming up with a car seems the perfect direction to spend money on. Making a car from a new-ish in this case Apple would be like Tesla popping a car on the world. Apple has just as much of a right to release a car as they did. I think an Apple Car would be interesting. I'd actually consider one if it fixes the issues I see in the other alternatives. Seriously. I don't want a Tesla, and the Ford Mustang has issues with parts, etc, and the truck, apparently, can't be resold, which sounds insane but...

Who knows, Apple could fall on their face with this, but they have the money to do it. They could also be The Next Big Thing, and sell out for eternity. Let them do it...
They don’t need to do something with that money, holding onto money for a rainy day is always a valid business option, because there will always be another recession. There’s no such thing as stocks being at a permanently high plateau, as soon as people start talking like that, that’s a great indicator of an impending crash. When people say, “it’s different this time” about finance, that’s when you know it’s the same as it ever was.

But, if Apple wanted to dip into some of that cash to kickstart a new product category, as much as I dislike it as a product category, I have to suggest that VR/AR would probably be a more viable product category. It aligns with their core competencies and usual approach to upgrades and profit margins far more than cars do. And, in the relatively near future, EVs are going to face a lot of political pressure from people and governments pushing for more public transportation. VR is much more likely to fly under regulatory radars.
 
They don’t need to do something with that money, holding onto money for a rainy day is always a valid business option, because there will always be another recession. There’s no such thing as stocks being at a permanently high plateau, as soon as people start talking like that, that’s a great indicator of an impending crash. When people say, “it’s different this time” about finance, that’s when you know it’s the same as it ever was.

But, if Apple wanted to dip into some of that cash to kickstart a new product category, as much as I dislike it as a product category, I have to suggest that VR/AR would probably be a more viable product category. It aligns with their core competencies and usual approach to upgrades and profit margins far more than cars do. And, in the relatively near future, EVs are going to face a lot of political pressure from people and governments pushing for more public transportation. VR is much more likely to fly under regulatory radars.

You know much about business?

Holding on to that money makes them a huge takeover risk, as well as a massive target for lawsuits that could claim that money.

Companies ahve been bought solely because of their massive fully funded retirement accounts and the purchasers disappear that money and bankrupt the company. Business is brutal, and the carnage is widespread. Apple could very well be a target for all kinds of things that could end up with Apple being in a really bad spot.
 
You know much about business?

Holding on to that money makes them a huge takeover risk,
But it also provides a war chest for fending off takeover attempts. Besides, look at just how expensive an attempt at a leveraged buyout of Apple would be, we’re talking over a trillion dollars of debt. Debt on that magnitude is still the exclusive domain of state actors at this point (the USD hasn’t yet lost enough value due to inflation for private trillionaires to have become a reality), with barely possibly the largest of firms approaching it. Apple’s market capitalization would have to plunge (and likely, plunge relative to the market and not just in absolute terms) to make any sort of corporate takeover attempt remotely practical.
 
But it also provides a war chest for fending off takeover attempts. Besides, look at just how expensive an attempt at a leveraged buyout of Apple would be, we’re talking over a trillion dollars of debt. Debt on that magnitude is still the exclusive domain of state actors at this point (the USD hasn’t yet lost enough value due to inflation for private trillionaires to have become a reality), with barely possibly the largest of firms approaching it. Apple’s market capitalization would have to plunge (and likely, plunge relative to the market and not just in absolute terms) to make any sort of corporate takeover attempt remotely practical.

Maybe maybe not. Apple would have a hard time fending off a determined suitor. But I'm no business expert myself, so I'll step aside...

But still, if a group of corporations joined together and bought Apple, they could eviscerate them, bank the money and still likely make a profit after all of it.
 
As I've been saying for years, ever since the rumors of an Apple Car first surfaced, Apple would be crazy to build and sell an automobile. If Apple did so, despite how good their electric car might be, they would suddenly be competing for sales with every other car manufacturer out there, and those companies would now have a disincentive to embrace Apple software in their vehicles.

Apple can generate far more revenue with their enhanced CarPlay approach, designing software that every other automobile manufacturer out there can integrate into their own vehicles, while Apple enhances the utility of owning an iPhone.
Unless a new Apple car is so distinctively different and Next-Gen functional, like the 1st smartphone started to wipe out the competition, that it will create its own market. We shouldn't forget that there is so much more to the subject of Personal Mobility than selling cars. If Apple's mindset is to bring just another car, Bang & Olufsen styled so to speak, but with all the Apple gizmos, then it would be a lost opportunity to cause an impact like Apple did with the iPhone.

huOusMdgklhN7YrKgnwK0dE1x5KMLtsfAaVsy7kdQD9cg_RkXys6jAp2RrnwAV2OAhmr_U3UMWLdmDu59iBN6z3QPbCT6Yhgl35eNyg79MGf5s3c60FYoFZ_ikq2rNYbAqeeDj7o=w728-h547
 
Unless a new Apple car is so distinctively different and Next-Gen functional, like the 1st smartphone started to wipe out the competition, that it will create its own market. We shouldn't forget that there is so much more to the subject of Personal Mobility than selling cars. If Apple's mindset is to bring just another car, Bang & Olufsen styled so to speak, but with all the Apple gizmos, then it would be a lost opportunity to cause an impact like Apple did with the iPhone.

huOusMdgklhN7YrKgnwK0dE1x5KMLtsfAaVsy7kdQD9cg_RkXys6jAp2RrnwAV2OAhmr_U3UMWLdmDu59iBN6z3QPbCT6Yhgl35eNyg79MGf5s3c60FYoFZ_ikq2rNYbAqeeDj7o=w728-h547

Seriously!!
 
Do apple really need the hassle of car production ? I doubt it

Then there’s the whole infrastructure, servicing etc

Are you supposed to drive your apple car to an apple store for servicing ? 😂

In that case I’d just leave it there
 
Do apple really need the hassle of car production ? I doubt it

Then there’s the whole infrastructure, servicing etc

Are you supposed to drive your apple car to an apple store for servicing ? 😂

In that case I’d just leave it there
They'd just outsource build to a contract manufacturer such as Magna Steyr.

At the moment, they could make a car with a world class infotainment system and integration with other iOS devices - I think fully autonomous driving is a bit of a pipe dream for the foreseeable future especially in a myriad of scenarios.
 
Unless a new Apple car is so distinctively different and Next-Gen functional, like the 1st smartphone started to wipe out the competition, that it will create its own market. We shouldn't forget that there is so much more to the subject of Personal Mobility than selling cars. If Apple's mindset is to bring just another car, Bang & Olufsen styled so to speak, but with all the Apple gizmos, then it would be a lost opportunity to cause an impact like Apple did with the iPhone.
But what exactly did Apple Watch offer over other Smart Watches with Rev A? Yes, it could be said that the first versions were considered too far ahead of their time and they had to be content with pushing other attributes (like the fashion angle rather than the tech angle).

I've given this a bit of thought, everyone seems to be thinking about the prospect of Apple trying to make the great leap to fully autonomous driving to give it that quantum leap over every other manufacturer. Why couldn't Apple make a luxury class car in a world where the likes of VW are cutting costs on interiors?

Yes, an Apple car without that massive USP would probably end up being an overpriced electric car that few will buy, especially with Tesla and several other non traditional brands offering cars in the next few years.

But look at the recent Car Play announcement, and bear in mind that some cars are starting to come with HUD type displays for navigation.

Where VW can only purchase a relatively small number of relatively inefficient laggy CPUs tied to a beta quality OS why couldn't Apple take a smaller leap as the car with a undisputed best infotainment system and Augmented Reality navigation while just diverting a small number of M-class Cpus from production with relative ease?

Realistically, if Apple can make their car more efficient using the latest dense battery tech which Tesla appear to be exploring already and pair it with high efficiency small node CPUs they can take that as a start.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.