That does not mean they can make a car.There is. But there’s more in hardware as well.
Apple has always been a hardware company (with integrated software).
That does not mean they can make a car.There is. But there’s more in hardware as well.
Apple has always been a hardware company (with integrated software).
So do I except this time Tesla proved Apple wrong. The Apple car ain't happening. I wish it would but Tim messed up big time and the window has now closed.Succinct and accurate.
And you already said it in your post, Apple isn’t just a hardware company, they’re a technology company. And I also just love it when Apple proves everybody else wrong.
“Blackberry CEO Skeptical About Apple Phone” … famous last words.
It's funny listening to CEO's who are in a state of denial. Delusional paranoia.
No but this is a car not a phone no matter how much Apple or anyone wishes it to be.Reinventing phones was a walk in the park?
I don't deny the quality is subpar. Apple will probably be twice a$ much. lolTesla's build quality is already horrible, imagine what it will be when they start cutting costs...
iPhones are hundreds of times more powerful these days than the pathetic chips car makers put in cars to power infotainment screens. The iPhone will for sure run the system. That lag when you try to move your car’s built-in satnav map? That’s because the chips are 💩 I can’t see the car manufacturers putting better chips in as it eats into profits. M-chip iPhones will be nuts.So are all those screens still just a phone projection, or is iOS actually built into the car, and then your phone sets your configuration?
And Microsoft: "It doesn't have a keyboard, so it's not a very good email machine." --Steve BallmerThis is what Blackberry said about the iPhone. VW is a bit larger (lol) than BB, but I would not take Apple lightly based on past evidence.
normal CarPlay is just a projection from software running on your phone. The car manufacturer doesn't need to integrate anything other than a display stream with touch targets. The degree of integration they showed at WWDC would require a much closer integration. Each manufacturer would need to work with Apple to connect various aspects of their cars into CarPlay++. That might mean having an built-in device that ran iOS and ran much of the software. Your phone would then be more of a client for software that and less of a host.So are all those screens still just a phone projection, or is iOS actually built into the car, and then your phone sets your configuration?
Why not? Apple is a hardware design company. Most the actually making is done by contractors.That does not mean they can make a car.
Yeah, except where is the Steve Jobs and Steve Woz, the revolutionary genius, and creative engineering genius, to create this? Tim Cook? The genius bean counter? Craig Federighi? The genius head of Abandoned Software Quality Control?“Blackberry CEO Skeptical About Apple Phone” … famous last words.
Cars are a lot more complex than a phone or a PC. One of the reasons car manufacturers sub contract much of he engineering of a car, is its now too specialised to do all in house. That and the margins the car industry work on is way lower then what Apple is used to. Oh and think fitting a new connector for Europe on an iPhone is a big deal? The regulatory environment of selling a car around the world is in a whole different league. It's hard to even describe how ill prepared Apple is for that.This makes no sense.
Apple has proven time and time again to be a hardware master, basically unmatched in the industries they choose to compete. Car hardware is a commodity, it’s got nothing intrinsic that Apple can’t do or improve.
This is what Blackberry said about the iPhone. VW is a bit larger (lol) than BB, but I would not take Apple lightly based on past evidence.
Why would Apple wish a car was a phone? They have a phone. Apple does not need to reinvent the wheel here. They need design and produce a good car. Many many decisions add up to a car and Apple will make those decision. How the dashboard looks and functions, for example, is going to be their unique take. I hope they make the right tradeoffs. I think Tesla prioritises touch too much, for example. They have hired many people who are expert in this field, so I guess only time will tell what bunch of choices they have made. Rivian went from being an EV battery only company to making a car. Well, Apple has bought a few companies and hired experts. They can make a car. The question is, can the take enough time and hire the right people to make a good/great car? We'll have answers at some point, because to me it seems like they do want to make one.No but this is a car not a phone no matter how much Apple or anyone wishes it to be.
I agree with the CEO here. Making a car is far more difficult than making an iPhone.
If anything Apple is probably creating mock cars to help prototype the future of CarPlay.
Not that Apple will see it as a factor going forwards but it looks like in the short to medium term due to emissions regulations that car manufacturers are moving away from low margin mass market cars to higher margin lower volume cars.I'm curious as to what revenue generation you're talking about? How much, if anything, does Apple charge car manufacturers for CarPlay? I was under the impression it wasn't meant as a revenue generator but as a way to extend the iPhone ecosystem/usefulness to the car.
In general, I agree. I've always thought that there's no way Apple would build a physical car - just not enough *profit* (vs. revenue) in it. Mass production car makers like VW make somewhere between 10-20% profit on each car. That's 50% less margin than Apple is used to (around 38%). I don't see Apple going into a business where they can't make 40% profit. If they tried that with high-priced items like cars, they wouldn't find many buyers - paying $200 more for an iPhone over an Android is one thing - paying $20k more for an iCar over another (that has CarPlay in it) is quite another, IMO.