Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Those are significant upgrades - more than I was expecting. Assuming that they can get the power and cooling worked out, these would be tough chips for Apple to ignore! At the least, we should see these chips dropped into the existing design - and one of the 8 core models with a Vega 20 will come pretty close to twice the performance of a 2016 or 2017 MBP (between the CPU and GPU upgrades).

The excitement looks like it applies mainly to the 15", which is what I've always had, and what I'm talking about from here on down... Starting in the Powerbook era, I've had close to half a dozen 15" Apple laptops, so I know the basic idea pretty well...

Apple had better upgrade the iMac before releasing these beasts - the i9 is significantly faster (according to the table in the AnandTech article) than the 7700K that powers the fully upgraded (but non-Pro) iMac. If these were out today, the top MBP would be the second-fastest Mac (second to the iMac Pro) - that's actually true today, due to the i9 version of the 2018 15" - but that machine is almost exactly the speed of the iMac, while this one will be notably faster.

If I had to guess, we'll see one of the two i9s as the upgrade processor... Which one depends on whether the HK is a greater than 45 watt processor. The catch is that the two i7s are so close that we'll see which one will serve as the top standard model, but Apple is unlikely to use both, which leaves a problem for the low model 15" - the i5s are quad-core and there's no 9th generation 6-core chip! Do we see the low model 15" keep an 8th generation CPU, or do we see it drop back from 6 cores to 4, or is there some CPU we aren't seeing?

Will we see the current Vega 16 and 20 in the 2019s, or will AMD come up with a 7 nm version in time? I don't think we're due for a big GPU bump performance-wise, but a 7 nm version of what they have might give some extra thermal headroom to let that hungry CPU run a bit hotter. .

My best speculative 2019 15" is as follows:

Essentially the current design (no new ports, still has the butterfly keyboard - perhaps with a minor generational improvement). Same screen, camera, Touch Bar and Touch ID. Same 16 and 32 GB RAM options. Either exactly the same SSD options or each configuration gets a 1 capacity bump (low model gets 512 GB, high model gets 1 TB). Maybe I'm being optimistic, but NAND prices are down substantially from last year - I've given my speculative Macs a bump.

High model: 8-core i7 (i9 upgrade option), Vega 20 (maybe with some 7 nm GPU as an upgrade), 1 TB SSD standard, 2 TB is a "reasonably" priced option (+$500?), 4 TB remains very expensive (+$2000???). 16 GB RAM standard, 32 GB option (+$200-$400), we may even see an expensive 64 GB option (+$1000-$1200?) - once they're using standard power DDR4 to get to 32 GB, there's no barrier to offering 64 GB as well.

Low model: top 4-core i5 (might be an 8th generation 6-core i7, or there might be a slower 8-core i7 we aren't seeing yet in the 9th generation lineup - any of these is reasonable), Vega 16 (maybe no upgrade option), 512 TB SSD, 1 TB inexpensive option (+$200), 2 TB +$700?, 4 TB very expensive (+$2200???). 16 GB with 32 GB option at same upgrade price as higher model.

And here's the Late 2020 (Sunny Cove) MBP - very speculative - mostly just for fun? Since they have to change the motherboard substantially to go to Sunny Cove, that's when the redesign is more likely to hit? Redesigned , with slightly larger screens - 13" becomes 14", 15" becomes either 15.6" or 16.something". They will get 10nm Sunny Cove CPUs, with 7nm Navi GPUs - we're still too far out to have any idea of models or speeds. Sunny Cove allows up to 64GB of low power RAM, if I'm not mistaken?

The screen resolutions increase - maybe as high as 4K in the 14" and 5K in the 15+". Probably still not an OLED screen, barring some breakthrough. Smaller bezels mean the machines don't increase in size to accommodate the larger screens.

Redesigned keyboard, but at least as flat if not flatter. Small chance of an e-ink keyboard and/or a haptic keyboard where the keys don't actually move. The Touch Bar stays (Apple very rarely backs off) unless the whole keyboard is e-ink or some other relabelable technology (or the trackpad picks up that function) Either Touch ID or Face ID, depending on how camera positioning works with whatever they do with the bezels.

Apple won't step back from the "all one port" design, but it may feature Thunderbolt 4? The advantage of TB4 would be that eGPUs are no longer an "it works, but it's right on the edge of being fast enough" proposition - TB4 will be plenty fast enough for any reasonable GPU. Still AMD only, because Apple simply won't write a NVidia driver into the OS. You can plug your GeForce in, and it'll work in Boot Camp, but not in OS X. The headphone jack is likely to be gone, but wireless charging may be mature enough to show up on a high-power device like a Mac.

Top model 15" (or whatever its new screen size is) gets the fastest available CPU, a nice mid-power GPU and a 32GB/1TB base configuration. Upgrade options go as far as 64 GB of RAM and a 4 TB SSD (perhaps more reasonably priced than it has been). Whether there's a very expensive 6 or 8 TB SSD configuration depends on what happens to NAND densities in the next year and a half - if Apple can do it in reasonable power and space, they will.

Lower model 15" gets a midline CPU and a "step down" GPU, as always. Base configuration is probably 16GB/512GB.

It wouldn't surprise me if the 13" uses a hybrid APU with Intel CPU cores and AMD graphics cores. Such things already exist in the 8th Generation lineup, and I'm a bit surprised they haven't shown up in the 13" MBP already - there was a lot of speculation when they came out that they were a special request for a large fruit-flavored phone company in Cupertino that also makes computers! A redesign might be the perfect time to drop them in...

No, I haven't forgotten about A-series Macs. I simply don't believe they're coming to the MBP any time soon. If an A-series Mac comes (which I think is reasonably likely), the first one will almost certainly be a MacBook or MacBook Air successor. Late 2020? 2021? 2022? It will be years more before it comes to the MacBook Pro, where power and compatibility (including Boot Camp/Parallels) are important, and tiny size is less so. If this redesign is in 2020, the next one is due around 2024, and that may well have several technologies that didn't make it into the 2020 model. I wouldn't be surprised either way on whether it was A-series (that might depend on how widespread Windows on ARM is, so whether Boot Camp/Parallels are meaningful on an ARM machine).

I could see Apple maintaining two Mac lines indefinitely, one Intel and one A-series - I've speculated in other threads that the Intel machines might carry the "Pro" label - MacBook Pro, iMac Pro, Mac Pro (and maybe Mac Mini Pro), while the A-series machines are labeled Mac Mini, MacBook, iMac. If that happened, the A-series machines could very easily wind up restricted to the Mac App Store to get their software, while the Pro line continue to get software from anywhere. The A-series machines would be smaller, lighter, sleeker and run iOS as well as MacOS software.

The Pro line would be the most powerful and run MacOS and Windows software at a cost in size, weight and battery life. In the case of an iMac, where size and weight don't matter as much and there's no battery, the ARM model would be a sleek, bezel and chin free machine meant for home use (21" plus a larger size, which could either be 24" or so, or possibly a "living room size" well above 30" that is meant to hang on the wall and double as a TV - maybe both). The Intel based iMac Pro, in 27" and 32" sizes (the 27" is actually the successor of the current 27" iMac, while the Xeon-based iMac Pro becomes a 32", 8K monster) keeps its bezels and chins in its natural habitat of studios, labs and high-end offices (etc.).

That would actually make the 13" MBP make more sense than it does now. There are a lot of Macs gathered around the 12" - 13" screen size right now. If the 13" MBP becomes the Intel option - somewhat bigger and heavier, but with broader compatibility, it becomes more differentiated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tjedora
.



All still 14nm right? So without a redesign we’ll be seeing further heat constraints I suppose?

The use of soldered IHS instead of TIM could result in better temps. Will have to wait and see I guess.

Still think it’s worth skipping this generation if only for the far better iGPU of the 10th gen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howard2k
Why not do a 15 watt or less quad core for a MacBook Pro 15 for better battery life?

Need the big screen but don’t need workstation class cpu power. Just web browsing and office apps. Think the blazing fast SSD makes more of a perceived speed difference.
 
Wow! “All new design”.
yep. the redesign is coming a year early

I've been arguing for that on these forums now for a while but based on the idea of faceId and slimmer bezels. 16-16.5 inches looks like slimmer bezel gain to me but there is no mention of faceID. so coudl be half wrong here.
 
I've long thought this was likely, but (like most of us), seem to have been a year off on the timing. Ming-Chi Kuo has an excellent track record, though. I have to say I'm a bit surprised - Sunny Cove will require a new motherboard, which the 9th Generation chips don't necessarily, so it seemed like the more likely redesign point.

Could the answer be cooling? It sure looks like the 9th Generation chips will be pushing the thermal envelope pretty hard - the specs sound like they might follow the recent Intel trend of going well above TDP on a regular basis - the (desktop) i9-9900K is a "95 watt" chip capable of drawing as much as 160 watts even without overclocking. If Apple designed a new case, they could cleverly figure out how to get rid of more heat. They went from the iMac (barely supports 95 watt CPUs) to the iMac Pro, which supports 140 watt CPUs silently, without adding any case volume - although they were able to get rid of a space-inefficient hard drive.

What's the resolution of that big new display? I'd say at least 4K, and I wouldn't put 5K past Apple...
 
I'm living on my June 2013 Air. It's been struggling recently and the battery is long past overdue for a replacement. Was hoping to get a MBP but I don't know if these ones are worth it.

I might spend a day seriously cleaning up everything on the drive and might look into a battery replacement to get another year out of it.

Yuck to no quad core non TB.
I would like to think that they have overcome the so called "flexgate" affair before I buy another MBP. I have the 2015 13" MBPr so I dodged a bullet there but my wife has a new 2018 MBP with touch bar and, well, they say it's only a matter of time before the dreaded "stage light" effect occurs. Fortunately she has extended Apple Care + through to 2021. We live in hope that Apple will offer extended care for what is after all a design flaw.
 
The question is, if only the 16" gets the redesign and if the 15" and 13" will still be updated with the 9th gen intel CPUs while keeping the same old design?
That's my assumption - they tend to phase new designs in from the top end anyway. I'm guessing this 16" Pro will slot in above the higher end 15" stock model at around $2,999 (if we're lucky) :D and the 2019 touchbars will be updated as expected too.
 
That's my assumption - they tend to phase new designs in from the top end anyway. I'm guessing this 16" Pro will slot in above the higher end 15" stock model at around $2,999 (if we're lucky) :D and the 2019 touchbars will be updated as expected too.
I don't think we'll have the current 15" and a new 16", the 16" will most likely be an update to the 15" with the same form factor but with thinner bezels, enough to get that extra inch of screen.
 
I don't think we'll have the current 15" and a new 16", the 16" will most likely be an update to the 15" with the same form factor but with thinner bezels, enough to get that extra inch of screen.
I agree it will ultimately replace it, but Apple tends to phase in new designs from the most expensive tier first (we saw it in 2012 with the retina where the unibody models stuck around; and in 2016 when the iGPU retina model was retained (though ultimately not replaced with anything). So I expect a similar lineup with this, particularly as going by an established 4 year cycle the touchbar design should have one more year to run first. That is unless the myriad problems with keyboards and T2 panics and flexgate have forced apple’s hand on bringing the redesign forward a year and they have decided they need to give the old models the chop ASAP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aquamite
That's my assumption - they tend to phase new designs in from the top end anyway. I'm guessing this 16" Pro will slot in above the higher end 15" stock model at around $2,999 (if we're lucky) :D and the 2019 touchbars will be updated as expected too.

I wouldn't be surprised if this was a 2020 thing, it will be great if it is this year but Apple typically redesigns the Macbook Pro every 4 years. I'm also thinking that the 15" will be discontinued and the new "16 or 16.5" Macbook Pro will replace it. The 15" probably is the new 16" but with reduced bezels, Apple has a war on bezels, they removed most of them from the iPhone, Apple Watch, iPad Pro and now they will start with the Mac.

The MacBook Pro being the first Mac to get reduced bezels first doesn't surprise me, the Macbook Pro is Apple's best selling Pro Mac (Apple said this a while ago) then it's the iMac and it trickles down to the Mac Pro and Mac Mini.
 
Is it known if the 9th gen U & H CPUs are LPDDR4 compatible for those 32GB on the 13” model?

I hope this new 16” model implies a price cut on all the older design models and not yet another scalation...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falhófnir
Is it known if the 9th gen U & H CPUs are LPDDR4 compatible for those 32GB on the 13” model?

I hope this new 16” model implies a price cut on all the older design models and not yet another scalation...

Ming Chi Kuo does state that the 13" will get 32GB Ram. I wonder when these machines will release, hope we don't have to wait until October!
 
Is it known if the 9th gen U & H CPUs are LPDDR4 compatible for those 32GB on the 13” model?

I hope this new 16” model implies a price cut on all the older design models and not yet another scalation...
Can’t find any official word, but if I remember correctly LPDDR4 was meant to come with 10nm Ice Lake this year so it’s been on the cards for a while? I don’t see any reason they should have to move to 10nm to make it happen so there is a possibility these chips could support it.

Ming Chi Kuo does state that the 13" will get 32GB Ram. I wonder when these machines will release, hope we don't have to wait until October!
I would assume WWDC is a strong possibility as it’s the closest event to the summer releases Apple seems to favour for MacBook Pros - I think the 2016s only launched in October because they had that issue with the new battery design they had to remedy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave245
That's really exciting news, everyone. I still remember a discussion here (I believe even on this thread) from a few months ago about the fact that there isn't a 17" MBP anymore. Many people brought good reasons forward for why there should be one, but everyone was kind-of in unison that it wouldn't happen.

And now we get this news out of the blue. Coming from Ming-Chi Kuo, I'd say it's almost certain that it is true. Not 100%, there were some cases where he misinterpreted what he learned from manufacturing lines, but it's still very, very certain.

Having said that, I personally don't think it'll be the replacement for the current 15" model (nor do I hope it to be, as that would almost certainly mean another significant price hike, which nobody is asking for). IMO it would make more sense that this would be a category on its own above the current MBP line, a new high-end option aimed mostly at certain groups of professionals, kind what like the iMac Pro is to the iMac line – a machine with an even bigger screen, better performance (thanks to improved heat dissipation and possibly a higher TDP) and possibly a larger selection of ports, but at the cost of portability and possibly battery life. The current 15" is a perfect size for many people, and has proven to be for many years – there's no need to usher that aside for an even bigger model that may very well be too large for many people, even if it's not a full 2" but only a 1-1.5" increase.

I do wonder what this supposed redesign will entail. Will it follow the style and design language of the current MBPs, just slightly tweaked/larger? Or will it be something else entirely, possibly slightly thicker (as many people have been asking for)? Will it have a new keyboard or another butterfly keyboard iteration? May we get a first glimpse at rounded screen corners in a Mac and/or Face ID already, or is it still too early for that? Etc.etc.

With this being the first redesign that sits "above" the current MBPs, it may also give us an indication of whether or not Apple plans to drop the Touch Bar (as many people here are hoping for) or if they will go all-in on it. If this 16" MBP doesn't have the Touch Bar, that means it'll eventually be discontinued everywhere. If it does have the Touch Bar, or maybe even a "Touch Bar v2" that addresses some of the complaints people have, it's probably here to stay.

Makes me a bit sad that I went out and bought a 2018 MBP last year already, I'm content with it but a redesign this year already is probably something I would have held out for. Then again, it's possible that it ends up above my price range anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soiramk and Dave245
a big redsign- i'd guess we are looking at summer or fall. Spring would be nice however is unlikely.

I was thinking maybe it will launch alongside the new Mac Pro. The MacBook Pro and Mac Pro updates along side the new Pro display.
 
My best guess is that the 16" (or so) is the replacement for the 15". It is quite possible that the 2.2 GHz 15" will stick around, both because Apple often likes to do that - leave a lower-end previous model as a low cost choice, and because it solves a chip problem.

Remember that there is no low-end option in the 15" (or 16") suitable 9th Generation chips leaked by AnandTech... There are two i9s (Apple will certainly choose one as the BTO upgrade chip), both of which are 8 core/16 thread. There are two i7s, both 8 core/8 thread - BUT they have nearly identical specifications (base clocks not yet disclosed, 0.1 GHz discrepancy in turbo clock, the CTP performance spec they post is identical - however that is calculated). There must be some different feature spec that doesn't show up in the limited AnandTech specs?

Apple will almost certainly pick one of those two i7s for the upper end stock model, but they are too similar to be used in both stock models. The problem is that the chip directly below them is a quad-core i5. That would mean taking the lower end model from six cores to four (or keeping the same 8th Generation chip) unless there is another chip that isn't disclosed.

What if, instead of that, they did the following lineup or something like it - three stock models.

1.)9th Generation i9, 32 GB/1 TB, new 16" screen/ redesign, Vega 20 (or better if they can get it). CTO upgrade options are limited to increased SSD size and maybe 64 GB of RAM or a memory upgrade on the Vega.

2.)9th Generation i7, 16 GB/512 GB, new 16" screen/redesign, Vega 16. CTO RAM can be upgraded to 32 GB (if 64 exists at all, it's top model only), GPU can go to Vega 20 (but not any upgrade above that offered by the top model), SSD upgrades are, of course available.

3.) 8th generation i7, 16 GB/either 256 GB or 512 GB, old 15" Touch Bar chassis. Vega 16. CTO upgrades include 32 GB of RAM and SSD upgrades, but probably no GPU upgrades. This is essentially the existing 2.2 GHz model with a Vega 16. If Apple's feeling generous, they'll throw in a free upgrade to 512 GB of SSD.

I would imagine that Model 1 will be priced at or slightly above today's top model plus the i9 upgrade. It might be as much anything from $3099 to $3299 entry, since the present i9 starts at $3099 (unless you downgrade the GPU or SSD from the $2799 stock model - that's possible by upgrading the $2399 model to an i9 while leaving the 256 GB SSD and/or Radeon 555X intact). Model 2 will be very similarly priced to the present $2799 stock model. Model 3 will either be $2399 like today's 2.2 GHz model or a modest decrease. If it doesn't include a 512 GB SSD, they could price it as low as $1999.
 
Why not do a 15 watt or less quad core for a MacBook Pro 15 for better battery life?

Need the big screen but don’t need workstation class cpu power. Just web browsing and office apps. Think the blazing fast SSD makes more of a perceived speed difference.

There are some who would like to see Apple use either a 15w U-Series or 28w U-Series to create a 15" version of the MacBook/MacBook Air. It would simply be a larger version of the new 13" MacBook Air with two TB3 ports and an audio jack.

Personally, I would prefer the 28w U-Series (i5-8259U/i5-8269U/i7-8559U) myself as the Iris Plus GPUs are faster than the UHD620 used in the 15w U-Series (Core i5-8265U, Core i7-8565U), but still a sight better than the UHD 617 used by the 7w Y-Series in the new 13" MacBook Air.

I doubt Apple will ever expand the MacBook Air line any further, so it's all just pure speculation.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.