Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm surprised at the number of people here just siding with Apple and towing the party line. The OP had his watch stolen. He sent it in to Apple in good faith, and someone nicked it pure and simple. Apple made him the offer, many here think he should have accepted that, which is fine. But the OP is perfectly entitled to reject that offer and ask them to improve it! For goodness' sake, he wasn't looking to pull a fast one. And Apple's response to a reasonable request to negotiate was to take all offers off the table! Sorry, but that is not reasonable behaviour from any company.

Does nobody here think that Apple went a bit OTT in their stroppy response?
This. But then I see the people defending Apple and its the same old users who defend them for years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kryptticAZ
The problem is once your product gets older than a year or two old it's unavoidable - you have to send them in. And if you have to send them in there's a possibility that it could get lost or stolen.
Which is when the vintage and obsolete Apple products list comes into play.

Apple Watch Series 5 isn’t classified as obsolete or vintage at all. Only Apple Watch Series 4 and Apple Watch Series 3 are vintage, series 0 to 2 are obsolete
 
  • Like
Reactions: kryptticAZ
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.