Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Take better care of your stuff? My Apple Watch Series 0 opened up the camera app in less than 5 seconds. Amongst other things, it isn't as slow as you make it out to be. I WILL AGREE THAT POWERING IT ON TOOK 5 MIN THO

Take better care of your stuff? What does that even mean for a processor? Don’t use it?

My S0 took just as long to open the camera. Not sure how I can take care of a wrist computer better other than not breaking it lmao
 
I've had all the generations of iWatch's. I just sold my iWatch 3. My opinion is that there is no comparison between the iWatch 4 and any of the other iWatch's. With continued software upgrades and upgraded Apps to come I don't know why we are even having this discussion. The iWatch 4 is just great! And this is from a person that wears and uses a watch every day.
 
I cannot overstate how wonderful of a product this watch line has become. I’m coming from a series 2 and it’s mesmorizing with the altitude, speed, loading web pages, ECG, etc.

This thing is a home run. Best product since AirPods
 
  • Like
Reactions: julesme
Screen size. Screen size. Screen size. All the extra complications are fantastic. More information! The other day I tried my ‘old’ watchface that I was fine with for 3 years...and it felt so ... outdated. And then there is the better call clarity. And it IS a bit faster, Siri works better for me. The four really is a notable upgrade to the three, even without the ECG.
[doublepost=1538226005][/doublepost]

What’s to talk about with price? A few have complained that once again Apple increased the features and dared to increase the price.. but honestly what else is there to discuss? It is significantly bigger screen. Significantly faster. Sounds better. I didn’t mind paying more because I got more. I know I will get attacked for saying that. If I didn’t want more, I had the choice of buying the reduced cost S3. So there you go. Pay more, get more. But you have a choice. Including not buying at all.
Price just isn't something that is mentioned in comparisons Of the watches that I've typically seen, and I was sharing my observation of this fact. 25% is a pretty huge leap, imo. I see the cost analysis of owning an x and xs series of iPhones come up often. Shoot, it's a main bullet point of the Xr nearly every time it's mentioned. Have a look at an article right on this site talking about the Xr receiving fcc approval; the lower price point is even mentioned there, which has little to do with the rest of the topic. Apple Watch? Almost never.

All of this Is less of a complaint and more of a valuable addition to the "which should I buy" topic. Considering this video was a little bit of that, making basic recommendations, at the end, I was surprised not to see any mention.

Certainly won't attack you for your opinion. You just seemed to discredit mine because I thought mentioning what the performance increase costs is a relevant piece of the puzzle. Disagree? No worries.
 
Last edited:
I cannot overstate how wonderful of a product this watch line has become. I’m coming from a series 2 and it’s mesmorizing with the altitude, speed, loading web pages, ECG, etc.

This thing is a home run. Best product since AirPods

Well you know Apple, they’re never first but they get it right. Usually by their 4 attempt!
 
it's the ECG, stupid (sorry, paraphrasing another subject here). I am very happy with my series 3, but I need to get kardiomobile egg or upgrade the watch, the watch has it, way more convenient than kardiomobile..
I get why it's a big deal for some (in your case it sounds like a no brainer), but in my case the ECG isn't really a feature that would compel me to upgrade, especially since the feature hasn't been approved by Health Canada yet, and who knows when it will be. Also, I did have a 6 lead ECG done a couple years back (work project requirement) and everything was good then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Donoban
I don't trust the start times as I have a Series 0 and it starts in 2 minutes 41 seconds!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Donoban
The Watch 4 is the first watch that really makes a statement for looks and utility of a smartwatch.

The processing has finally gotten good enough to make this compelling enough to replace your iPhone some of the time.

You nailed it. The Series 3 with LTE really seemed to me to be the product that should’ve been released on day one but Apple had fallen behind in the smart watch market and had to get the product out there and then, let’s face it, figure out what market it was going to try to appeal to. It turned out to be health and fitness plus those who could benefit tremendously from some of its other features. I bought the original strictly for its ability to receive notifications, the ability to view / respond to text messages and the ability to see who is calling without having to take the phone out of my pocket or to have to go to it while it’s charging or if I’d set it down in a different area of my home. I also liked its integration with Apple Maps while driving.

I wanted to buy the Series 3 but something told me to wait until the Series 4 and I’m very glad I did. I just ordered it and am very excited to receive it!
 
Last edited:
Call quality, the main factor in my choice to upgrade. The new speaker loudness and clarity is so far above the series 3 it sold me on that one feature. I do appreciate the other stuff too.

I agree. Call quality and loudness is the only reasons I'm considering upgrading. I am perfectly OK with the speed on my Series 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redneckitengineer
People will find interesting ways to convince themselves spending money on cool stuff makes sense. GPS and cellular are the most compelling reasons to upgrade.
 
This highlights the stupidity of the first real gold Apple Watch Edition that started at $10,000 and went up to $17,000. How stupid does one have to be to spend so much money on something that will be outperformed by the cheapest Apple Watch the very next year, and massively outperformed by the cheapest Apple Watch a few years after that?

The $10,000+ watches are clearly designed for rich people as a sign of status and money. They were not designed for average people. So yes, if you are not rich then it would be stupid to buy a $10,000 watch. However if are rich and want the watch, it's yours for asking.
 



The Apple Watch Series 4, launched last week, features a new dual-core S4 chip that's significantly faster than the S3 chip in the Series 3, and, of course, the chips used in older Apple Watch models.

We did a side-by-side comparison of the Apple Watch Series 4 to the original Apple Watch, the Series 1 models, the Series 2 models, and the Apple Watch Series 3 to see how far the Apple Watch has come since it was first introduced in 2015.


According to Apple, the fourth-generation dual-core 64-bit Silicon-in-Package or SIP chip in the Apple Watch is twice as fast as the previous-generation S3 chip. Its improved efficiency and speed allow for better battery conservation and new health-related features like ECG readings.

In our testing, we compared Apple Watch tasks like booting up, opening apps, and activating Siri to demonstrate the speed differences between each generation.

Unsurprisingly, the Series 4 was the fastest, but for a lot of tasks, there weren't huge speed differences between the Series 4 and the Series 3.

When comparing the Series 4 to the Series 2 and older, though, you can see the impressive improvements Apple has made to the processor over the course of the last three years. While it took the Apple Watch Series 4 40 seconds to boot up, it took the Series 2 almost four minutes, the Series 1 three minutes, and the Series 0 five minutes.

When opening up apps, we didn't see a huge difference between the Series 3 and Series 4 for most tests, but the Series 4 was always just a little bit faster. On Series 2 and older, apps took a good deal longer to open, and in some cases, like with the original Apple Watch, apps took so long we gave up.

So, what can we learn from this? You may not see major speed changes when upgrading to Series 4 from Series 3, though everything will feel snappier.

You will, however, notice an incredible difference upgrading from an original Apple Watch, Series 1 model, or Series 2 model, which makes upgrading from one of these older devices worthwhile.

In our opinion, if you're considering upgrading from a Series 2 or earlier to the Series 4, do it. The speed changes are so drastic that using the Apple Watch Series 4 is an entirely different experience than using an older Apple Watch.

Have you upgraded to a Series 4 from an older Apple Watch model? Let us know what you think about the new device in the comments below.

Article Link: Watch the Apple Watch Series 4 Smoke Older Apple Watches in Speed Comparison
Series 0?
 
That's a bit weird for S0 having different speed/time cost from S1. Aren't they share the same chip?
 
I'll still wait. I have had my S2 for almost 2 years now. Also, I'm on prepaid, so I don't know how easy it would be to get the cellular model to work on cellular.

Also, I already paid my Apple tax this year buying a new iPad when resetting my old Mini as new would have, in retrospect, solved my problems with it :)
 
I seriously had no idea that the AW could operate as fast as my Series 4 has been operating.

I was so accustomed to the sluggish behavior of the S0 since day one, and even my upgrade to a S2 on watchOS 4 felt disappointing.

Up until now, I just assumed that was the nature of a smart watch: slow and only really good for telling the time.

Now everything is so quick and actually works. I had no idea Scribble could actually keep up with me.

Definitely worth upgrading if you’re on S2 or earlier.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.