Why couldn't they open up the entire watch faces to the developers?
They will, eventually.
Why couldn't they open up the entire watch faces to the developers?
Whoever that was giving the watchOS presentation has all the stage presence and charisma of a toilet seat. Necessary, functional, but very boring.
"Third party complication support, isn't that awesome?"
"Here's two more digital watch faces without any complications!"
I agree - but why worry about that?
I'm listening for the information - I don't care about how the speaker talks, or how he dresses.
Even though there were a couple of minor bugs introduced with 1.0.1 there were several improvements and you should update.I am pretty stoked about watchOS 2.0. I am curious if I should update my Watch OS now. I am currently on 1.0 and I see that 1.0.1 is available. Should I update or not?
Even though there were a couple of minor bugs introduced with 1.0.1 there were several improvements and you should update.
I'd have to agree with you.Quantity is not > Quality.
I'd rather have 10 high quality Apple made watch faces over 1000 mediocre 3rd party watch faces.
Visiting the Apple Store for a new watch face is a cool idea for people that are near an Apple Store, but many people are not.The new watch faces were frustrating. Two more digital faces with the time in the same font on the top right and tons of unused space for complications. With third party complications coming (awesome!) they shouldn't have a single face that doesn't support them (and let you turn them off).
In general, I feel like some watch faces could be so simple to make that Apple should be releasing them all the time to keep the buzz going and people happy. There should have been a WWDC themed face pushed to our watches yesterday. The colorful logo IS a watch face already in its design. Every keynote they should announce a new watch face... Or heck, use NFC to only unlock a new face if you visit an Apple Store this month or something. Partner with fashion brands to offer exclusive watch faces if you visit their stores. (As you are most likely that store's target customer if you can afford an Apple Watch and want their watch face).
These are things Nintendo has been doing with their 3DS handheld for years.
The new watch faces were frustrating. Two more digital faces with the time in the same font on the top right and tons of unused space for complications. With third party complications coming (awesome!) they shouldn't have a single face that doesn't support them (and let you turn them off).
In general, I feel like some watch faces could be so simple to make that Apple should be releasing them all the time to keep the buzz going and people happy. There should have been a WWDC themed face pushed to our watches yesterday. The colorful logo IS a watch face already in its design. Every keynote they should announce a new watch face... Or heck, use NFC to only unlock a new face if you visit an Apple Store this month or something. Partner with fashion brands to offer exclusive watch faces if you visit their stores. (As you are most likely that store's target customer if you can afford an Apple Watch and want their watch face).
These are things Nintendo has been doing with their 3DS handheld for years.
the information is the most important. However, Apple seems to care as much about how they package their products and the products themselves.
Really looking forward to all of these people bricking their watches with beta builds they're not supposed to have.Should prove entertaining.
People with no patience for bugs really shouldn't be running beta code.![]()
It doesn't seem like Apple cares as much about the presentation recently.
They let the managers of each department give the presentations. That's not always the right strategy. Especially with the watch OS - you've got this Bill Gates type - geeky, but not a good speaker - giving the presentations.
The perfect speaker was Steve Jobs. He had charisma, knew his stuff, seemed a mixture between both a geek and a fun guy to have a beer with. It's hard to find that quality. No other company has the perfect person speaking, either.
The new watch faces were frustrating. Two more digital faces with the time in the same font on the top right and tons of unused space for complications. With third party complications coming (awesome!) they shouldn't have a single face that doesn't support them (and let you turn them off).
In general, I feel like some watch faces could be so simple to make that Apple should be releasing them all the time to keep the buzz going and people happy. There should have been a WWDC themed face pushed to our watches yesterday. The colorful logo IS a watch face already in its design. Every keynote they should announce a new watch face... Or heck, use NFC to only unlock a new face if you visit an Apple Store this month or something. Partner with fashion brands to offer exclusive watch faces if you visit their stores. (As you are most likely that store's target customer if you can afford an Apple Watch and want their watch face).
These are things Nintendo has been doing with their 3DS handheld for years.
Totally agree. Even if they don't open it to developers, Apple themselves can do so much more. As you said, keep the buzz, and keep people excited and try out new watch faces. They have thousands of designers, so it's seriously not too much to ask for. As much as I love my Apple Watch and the overall experience, my old iPod Nano 6G had more interesting watch faces, especially the digital ones.
Jobs and ive were the best combo.It doesn't seem like Apple cares as much about the presentation recently.
They let the managers of each department give the presentations. That's not always the right strategy. Especially with the watch OS - you've got this Bill Gates type - geeky, but not a good speaker - giving the presentations.
The perfect speaker was Steve Jobs. He had charisma, knew his stuff, seemed a mixture between both a geek and a fun guy to have a beer with. It's hard to find that quality. No other company has the perfect person speaking, either.
Jobs and ive were the best combo.
Whoever that was giving the watchOS presentation has all the stage presence and charisma of a toilet seat. Necessary, functional, but very boring.
Why? It's not like you have to use them. If someone else wants an ugly, crappy, tacky watch face... So what? How does that affect you? You still have yours the way you like it.No, considering the watch face is the first thing people see on the Apple watch it would generally be a good idea not to display a crappy 3rd party watch face? If I was Apple I wouldn't allow for 3rd party watch faces and if I did I'd make sure a team reviewed it to be sure its up to Apple's standards.
Visiting the Apple Store for a new watch face is a cool idea for people that are near an Apple Store, but many people are not.
That said, I do hope they update watch faces frequently. I really want a heartbeat watch face, EKG-style.
Exactly. I find it tacky that there's a Mickey Mouse face preloaded. I get that it is a riff on a classic design but I don't want it. The only difference between it and third party watch faces is that surely some admittedly miniscule amount of my purchase price actually went to pay for a license of Mickey's likeness. If it was 5 cents, that is still 5 cents I couldn't choose not to pay.Why? It's not like you have to use them. If someone else wants an ugly, crappy, tacky watch face... So what? How does that affect you? You still have yours the way you like it.
The only thing this would do is allow devs to be creative and make even more elegant, classy, informative watch faces.