watchOS 4.3.1 Beta Hints at Future Support for Third-Party Apple Watch Faces

but when are you ever going to use someone elses apple watch?
and a different watch face doesn't change how you operate the watch.

Being ok with the lack of being able to make your own watch face does reinforce that one is comfortable as a conformer. And after all that is the goal of political correctness and government policy in general.

Apple used to have a motto of "Think Different", but with the iPhone and the closed ecosystem, not so much any more. You can only Think Different if Apple approves of your thinking.
 
The heuristic for whether you’re looking at it is kinda wanting, at least on S0. Maybe it’s gotten better in newer models?

Mine works great. Rarely do I ever have to "click" my wrist again to get the Watch to turn on.

Always on is pointless. If you have your full watch face on all the time it greatly reduces battery life. It makes no sense to use up your battery to have something displayed on your watch for the 95% of the day when you're not actually looking at it. If you have only the time displayed (to save battery power) then you need to tap your watch to get it to activate the "full" display and get access to all your information. So you're not really saving anything by displaying "only" the time.
 
Apple has turned into a bag of bozos. I'm surprised they even let people write apps...because the built-in apps should be enough. Right? I mean, who needs a calculator on the iPad anyway? Your own custom watch face? Perish the thought that the people might sully Apple's design aesthetic.
 
As always it brings a smile to my face to read posts by HARD Apple fans, saying they don't want choice and feel Apple should not give others choice either.
Apple knows best and you should be happy with that.

I have to wonder if they hold this viewpoint about other aspects of their life?
when you go food shopping you have to accept only the food they tell you to, or wear the cloths you are told to.

Funny isn't it.

Logical fallacy. Just because someone is happy with their existing device doesn't mean they're opposed to choice.
 
I seem to always default to modular. But for getting dressed up I would love to see something similar to the Hermès watch face. I don’t want it to be identical, because the people who paid for that version of the watch should enjoy their exclusive access to it. I just want something laid out similar to that design. I think it works with the rectangular shape of the watch so nicely.
It's going to be really interesting to see how they regulate this. I remember Apple was sued by some Swiss clock maker several years back for the design of the clock icon or something on iOS and they either had to pay them or tweak it slightly. Seems like clock faces are protected under patents or copyright and I always assumed that was a small part of the reason they didn't allow them.
 
Lol this is nothing; I write those kinds of hand-wavy possible future direction comments in my code all the time, too. It should have been a comment (and then it would have been stripped away at compile-time), but somebody mistakenly made it a log message.

It's just a developer noting down where in the process this might happen, if they were ever directed to implement that. All it tells us is that the Watch is technically capable of supporting 3rd-party faces, which it obviously can as well as any first-party face.

Hell, I forget to even include the todos. I stick by the tried and tested "I'll definitely remember to implement this in a month from now".
 
I feel like they can do more with machine learning. For instance, if someone texts “what time is your appointment?” or something like that, your phone can search your calendar and give a quick reply.
 
It's going to be really interesting to see how they regulate this. I remember Apple was sued by some Swiss clock maker several years back for the design of the clock icon or something on iOS and they either had to pay them or tweak it slightly. Seems like clock faces are protected under patents or copyright and I always assumed that was a small part of the reason they didn't allow them.
Wow. It’s a miracle the Samsung watch faces store isn’t litigation city then. Have you seen the outright copies there? :eek:
 
When I read the title, I figured this was gonna be an ambiguous reference in the code, but nope it's pretty clear... haha

As always it brings a smile to my face to read posts by HARD Apple fans, saying they don't want choice and feel Apple should not give others choice either.
Apple knows best and you should be happy with that.

I have to wonder if they hold this viewpoint about other aspects of their life?
when you go food shopping you have to accept only the food they tell you to, or wear the cloths you are told to.

Funny isn't it.

Ok, so I'm not really an advocate of Apple banning 3rd party watch faces, but this is a horrible analogy.

Yes we DO only accept the food that the grocery store provides or that the clothing store provides. Old Navy doesn't allow random people to come off the street and sell clothes inside their store. The stores are inherently limiting our options and making these decisions for us. Just like how Apple does with watch faces. Of course comparing physical goods with digital goods brings up a host of problems, but you're the one who brought up the analogy ;)
 
Brining some beloved Bauhaus Max Bill Style to Apple Watch. I made these mockups on launchday of the original Apple Watch. ;)

32414804jm.jpg
They look very nice. I use all the complications I can on my watch (not to see data, but to get to an app quickly), which would spoil the elegant look of these faces. I wonder if Apple would allow hidden complications, ie you would have to remember which was where, but by tapping the relevant corner the app opened.
 
Wow. It’s a miracle the Samsung watch faces store isn’t litigation city then. Have you seen the outright copies there? :eek:

Lack of litigation doesn’t mean there’s no infringement. Those developers could simply be too small for the watch manufacturers to bother with. If an Apple developer copied, say, a Tag Heuer Watch, then I’m sure you’d see legal action.
 
They look very nice. I use all the complications I can on my watch (not to see data, but to get to an app quickly), which would spoil the elegant look of these faces. I wonder if Apple would allow hidden complications, ie you would have to remember which was where, but by tapping the relevant corner the app opened.

thats a great idea.

im torn between wanting as many complications on one screen and wanting a clean face, so I mix up modular ones with lots of complications with ones like Numerals and Simple, with all complications turned off. being able to set them to be on but hidden would be great.

or even if you have a choice of using the 2nd button to bring them up, as I never use it for its normal use, its so cluttered.
 
Doubt it will happen. Still waiting on real live wallpaper for the iPhone. Apple doesn’t care about your desire to customize.
 
When the Watch came out I was upset that it didn't have this feature. Now that I have a Series 3 since a few months, I find that I don't have a need for this functionality. I use the Watch for well, timekeeping and sports. More customization can be a good feature, but can some of you give some examples of what you would do or what you would third-party developers to do with it that isn't possible now? I haven't seen any other smartwatch face that I would want to emulate, and I don't miss anything right now.

Here’s some off the top of my head:

  • Roman numeral face
  • Weather-based face (think the stock weather app on iPhones but as a watchface)
  • More abstract faces/unique ways of keeping time. Think sundial, or the concept a user posted here where the hands were circles.
  • 24-hour analog face. Yes these exist and I quite like them.
  • And how about some, I don’t know, *square* watch faces? IIRC the only square one is restricted to Hermès
The possibilities are quite literally endless. Even if Apple decides which 3rd party ones make the cut, it would be a huge improvement and greatly increase variety.
 
All I need is an analogue watch face with custom backgrounds. Perhaps also with a few different hand designs.

Yup. A 'photo with hands' version would be perfect way to give yourself a fake rolex/jaeger/patek.
And That's probably the reason why it isn't allowed.

Its also a large potential revenue source.

18 million watches sold last year
$18,000,000 dollars if everyone pays a buck for an app
$4,500,000 if Apple get a quarter commission.

Not something they would give away without thinking about it first.
 
This would be a big improvement for sure. What would be even better is if they release non-developer tools to the masses to make their own. There's nothing to say they won't, I just would bet money it'll all tie back to XCode and a Dev account if it happens at all.

One thing I can't stand is all of the round watch face on a rectangular screen. Hermes had the right idea. If Apple wont make them they should let people make their own.
[doublepost=1523905103][/doublepost]
Wow. It’s a miracle the Samsung watch faces store isn’t litigation city then. Have you seen the outright copies there? :eek:

I recall the Pebble one being rampant with things like Rolex watch faces and the like - branding and all. IIRC nobody did anything about it. Then again Pebble never had Samsung or Apple's pockets.
 
Last edited:
thats a great idea.

im torn between wanting as many complications on one screen and wanting a clean face, so I mix up modular ones with lots of complications with ones like Numerals and Simple, with all complications turned off. being able to set them to be on but hidden would be great.

or even if you have a choice of using the 2nd button to bring them up, as I never use it for its normal use, its so cluttered.
Or possibly, we could have a swipe right to give us 4 detailed complications.
 
Wow. It’s a miracle the Samsung watch faces store isn’t litigation city then. Have you seen the outright copies there? :eek:
Companies don't tend to get litigious until Apple does something because that's when it goes mainstream. If they sue too early they won't get as much money from infringement and it will serve as a warning for Apple to not infringe. Right now the Android Wear market is a lot smaller and it's mainly the nerdy types that customize their watches to look like GoldenEye, etc (this would probably be me if I didn't have an Apple Watch). Gotta sue while the suing's good.
 
I used to think I’d want 3rd party faces, but the reality is, the only ones I’d want would be photo-realistic brand name faces, and most of the watch companies I’d love to see faces from will have zero interest in lending their cachet to a competitor’s watch. Which means unauthorized brand name 3rd party faces will be rejected by Apple.

What I would love to see is much more robust native customization options.

Let me move elements around with my finger or on the phone.

Let me scale dials. Let me make everything more bold.

How about gradient colors instead of just boring solid colors. How about hands that “glow” green-blue at night in homage to real luminous hands.

How about a virtual Reverso, where tapping the dial flips it over to reveal a second dial with a different time zone or function.

Let me use gestures for music or HomeKit stuff without actually being in the app.

Let me tap the screen 3 times to virtual tap my wife’s wrist with a haptic, without fiddling with the messages app, to let her know we gotta leave a crappy dinner party ASAP.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top