It seems as though in the act of saying he isn't judging or that he won't say what he does or doesn't support, he's both judging and saying what he does and doesn't support.
I mean I never said what I support or don't support, I just expressed humor in the idea of someone blatantly posting something to the effect of
"Hey everyone, I know most people have to pay for things that they want, but I'm above the rules and feel that I should be given things for free, but I'm not even willing to work on ways to get those things, in fact, I won't even do so much as Google something. I want everyone on this forum to make my life easier by telling me how to have things for free"
And making sweeping generalizations on ones' intentions. The OP only wanted to know how to get tethering for free, due to stated reasons of laziness and cheapness. He did not say he feels entitled to or above paying for TVs, cars, blenders, Foreman grills or diamond-encrusted walking sticks filled with Jim Beam.
I find it amazing that people will rush to a company's defense of suspect policies that push the envelope further and further, yet when consumers fight fire with fire they're roasted. You can just as easily argue that if companies wish to ensure their policies are followed, close the loopholes that allow them not to be. I prefer that companies merely operate fairly and I'll gladly give them my money.
You legislate being right-handed as illegal and you'll have a world of outlaws. But at least scwinsett will follow the rules and learn to be left-handed. I bet he/she never exceeds the speed limit either.
