I bought SS primarily because Apple did the right thing and used the proper crystal. Once I bought my first Rolex and experienced how nice it is to have a tough scratch resistant material, it's worth the money. All Apple watches should have them. Even if it does raise the price a bit.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, the wife scratched hers
- Thread starter blackbear219
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
The first video only tested a Sapphire watch, and the second one pretty much echoed what we knew: The Sport watch will scratch easier than the SS version.
The question is, which "shattered" more easily? I've subscribed to the CR channel, so I hope they will test this.
I was going to get the sports watch but then i tried on the SS and looked better but also i may drop the watch
I've only seen a drop test on the glass sport. Can you provide a link to a sapphire drop test? Thanks.
From Business Insider related to this test: "The publication notes that the Watch Sport's scratch-resistance was still impressive, however."
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-watch-scratch-test-2015-4#ixzz3YkJEchla
I can understand that we each like to justify our smart purchase decision but those who have the Sport... do not fret!! http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-watch-scratch-test-video-2015-4 The Sport holds up very well in this test!
Last edited:
Lol that video is funny. I can't tell if the kid really just didn't expect it to break, or if it's just bad acting . Either way it's pretty funny.
In any event a 5 foot face plant onto concrete is going to be a pretty dramatic experience for any material.
I have a SS Panerai watch which I've had for 6 years now. No scratches, but under a bright light, I can see very very fine hairline scratches around the bezel - no bid deal. The point of this is that I learned that there are different grades of SS. I don't think Apple uses the higher quality of SS despite their high price tag on these watches.
http://www.hho4free.com/stainless_steel_types.htm#Grades of Stainless
I've worn a Pebble Steel for a year. It has Gorilla Glass, and I've banged it into walls and furniture and the face has no scratches. Dumb luck I guess.
The video is 100% fake. If you look, you'll see that he "artfully" inserted alternate angles of the drop. The demolished phone was inserted and made to look like a pristine was being dropped. To be done properly, it should be one continuous shot.
Plus, the angle at which the main action is shot would preclude the alternate angle being simultaneously shot without the photographer being in the frame.
He also oversold the damage. It would have been more believable if the watch had a few fractures. This one clearly had been hit by a hammer.
It's amateurish as this sort of thing goes, and the nimrod who posted it is probably getting a big kick out of the one million+ hits. I guess some folks are attention starved.
You are correct, though, even though fake, that sort of drop would be exceedingly unfortunate and unlikely. And besides, I've owned watches for decades, and cannot remember a single instance where I've dropped on one a hard surface.
Yeah I like his first gasp terrible acting. And it's interesting how he manages to keep everything in frame, continues recording, and then goes ahead and uploads the video. If that were real I could see his little project going south pretty quickly and not ever ending up on his channel
Consider who these "they" are.
There's no technically about it. Synthetic sapphire is sapphire. It's a crystalline solid. The chemical structure is identical to the stuff found in nature. It's not a glass. It fits no definition of a glass, save for the fact that it has a high degree of optical transparency. No one who is a materials scientist calls it a glass. Apple doesn't call it a glass. People who describe it as a glass (generally internet article writers who probably don't have a science/engineering background) do so incorrectly and not just "technically". This is important because amorphous and crystalline materials have differing properties, and it's misleading to convey that the sapphire used on the Apple Watch and Watch Edition models is any any way a form of glass.
Glass is an amorphous solid, meaning the atoms/molecules lack long-range order (similar to a liquid phase substance). Amorphous is the antonym of crystalline. Here there are also some misnomers — "crystal" chandeliers and "crystal" champaign flutes are not crystalline materials, they are in fact amorphous glass. It's just that we've gotten into the habit of calling heavy lead ion glass "crystal."
Interesting materials science fact: Most gemstones possess optical clarity in at least some portion of the visible light wavelength range. However, this makes them outliers. Most materials become more opaque as crystallinity increases (and conversely, transparency often increases with increased amorphous character).
Last edited: