How well would this perform on a Mac with USB 2.0? (Obviously not ideal, but hoping it would be some 'future-proof' storage expansion until I can afford to upgrade my mid-2010 iMac.)
Very very slowly, as with any USB 2.0 device. But it's hard to see why it wouldn't work.How well would this perform on a Mac with USB 2.0? (Obviously not ideal, but hoping it would be some 'future-proof' storage expansion until I can afford to upgrade my mid-2010 iMac.)
I want to replace my aging collection of external spinning platters with SSD for data integrity purposes. They also require huge amount of power and produce quite a bit of heat, some noise, as well as take up a lot of room. The only certainty with a spinning hard drive is that it will eventually die.Portable SSDs are overkill for most use cases. The two exceptions already mentioned would be VMs and video editing, although I am curious about the longevity of an SSD used for video editing.
I want to replace my aging collection of external spinning platters with SSD for data integrity purposes. They also require huge amount of power and produce quite a bit of heat, some noise, as well as take up a lot of room. The only certainty with a spinning hard drive is that it will eventually die.
So speed is definitely not just the only consideration. I just wish it wasn't so cost prohibitive still.
Unpowered flash storage can lose data over time, but we are talking months not days. Pretty good article here about it.Are SSDs providing the same data integrity as HDDs? I know Samsung's Pro models have a 10 year warranty and the EVOs have a 5 year warranty, but I thought spinning HDDs were less susceptible to data corruption and SSDs risked losing data if they were powered off for long periods of time.
Unpowered flash storage can lose data over time, but we are talking months not days. Pretty good article here about it.
So yeah... if you want to archive off some photos and put the drive on a shelf for a year, an SSD would not be the best option.
I think for a week or so, you would be okay. From what I understand it would take at least three months or so, and even then it may not happen at all.Thanks for that link. I need to upgrade our XBox One storage and plan on doing so via the external USB port. I was considering an SSD, but not now, as our X1 may be off for a week or more depending on time of the year and such. I just don't have the patience to reinstall games from disc just because the SSD was not powered.
And there was me thinking the design is absolutely awful.Looks pretty nice, and it is just as cheap as other companies.
SSD drive connected to USB 2.0 is absolutely pointless. USB 2.0 will give you at most about 30-35 Mbyte per second. That's a lot slower than any spinning hard drive, which can easily do up to 120 Mbyte per second. Save your money and get a 1TB spinning hard drive for £50 or 2TB for £70.How well would this perform on a Mac with USB 2.0? (Obviously not ideal, but hoping it would be some 'future-proof' storage expansion until I can afford to upgrade my mid-2010 iMac.)
Are SSDs providing the same data integrity as HDDs? I know Samsung's Pro models have a 10 year warranty and the EVOs have a 5 year warranty, but I thought spinning HDDs were less susceptible to data corruption and SSDs risked losing data if they were powered off for long periods of time.
And there was me thinking the design is absolutely awful.
[doublepost=1491837945][/doublepost]
SSD drive connected to USB 2.0 is absolutely pointless. USB 2.0 will give you at most about 30-35 Mbyte per second. That's a lot slower than any spinning hard drive, which can easily do up to 120 Mbyte per second. Save your money and get a 1TB spinning hard drive for £50 or 2TB for £70.
And there was me thinking the design is absolutely awful.
[doublepost=1491837945][/doublepost]
SSD drive connected to USB 2.0 is absolutely pointless. USB 2.0 will give you at most about 30-35 Mbyte per second. That's a lot slower than any spinning hard drive, which can easily do up to 120 Mbyte per second. Save your money and get a 1TB spinning hard drive for £50 or 2TB for £70.
I have been using a Sandisk Extreme pro 500 (480gb) for a year now and I love it. (Amazon had a 1/2 off sale on sandisk products!) The lightness means that you can just lift you laptop and move it with the drive just dangling. It's soooo much faster than a normal external that you can edit video in FCPX off of it.
When my connecter failed I was able to pop the drive out and copy the files (unlike most WD drives) and sandisk replaced it with the 510 which is splash proof and dust proof!
I love it
Congrats, this time don't 'just pick up your Mac and let "it" dangle' ... and your 'connector won't fail'
Reading the front half was cringe worthy! The second ½ put the worthiness in the cringe!
Congrats, this time don't 'just pick up your Mac and let "it" dangle' ... and your 'connector won't fail'
Reading the front half was cringe worthy! The second ½ put the worthiness in the cringe!
It's fine and I still do it with my new one. It happened when it wasn't even connected to the computer when it happened. It's apparently a known issue that they fixed. Seriously the drive weights less than a 3ft cord. It's a tool, not a work of art. I use this to edit video, important stuff is storage elsewhere.
This drive is currently Best Buy exclusive and I just picked up a 512GB one yesterday. It is very light and small, half metal (silver part) half plastic (black part). Comes with a USB Type-C cable with 3.1 gen 2 support and a USB Type-C to Type-A adaptor.
I don't have a Samsung T3 to compare, but the speed is decent. Blackmagic results show around 400MB/s write and 425MB/s read with either the provided cable or my own Belkin TB3 cable connected to a 13" MacBook Pro with no touch bar. Wondering if and how to get the claimed 515MB/s speed result.