Why do you think the purpose of an emotional reaction is to change its cause?
If it's ineffective why have it? If it's for your personal well being do it at home.
Why do you think the purpose of an emotional reaction is to change its cause?
If it's ineffective why have it? If it's for your personal well being do it at home.
Do you think it is useless and inappropriate to grieve a loss? You don't think that serves and purpose other than to attempt to reverse that loss?
You seem quite convinced that an emotional reaction is only intended to change what caused it. I'm not sure that's true at all. In fact, the only conclusion I can draw so far from what you are proposing is that people shouldn't have emotions.
Perhaps we could consider annoyance as an emotional reaction. In which case, it is useless to be annoyed at people who have emotional responses: you can't change it.
Actually I can and have changed it.
Another little tidbit common sense application of rules and laws. Remember perspective, none of the thing I have brought up equate in any way with death.
I lol'ed.Awesome post. I upvoted it.
Between stimulus and reaction there is time for thought.
Very Vulcan of you.![]()
You can't change other people having an emotional response. So it seems by your reasoning your annoyance is unwarranted.
And since you failed to qualify anything, I'm simply trying to figure out what you're thinking and trying to understand it.
Ok, so it is acceptable to you to have an emotional response in some cases. Perhaps you could describe situations in which is isn't acceptable to you? Also, I still don't understand why you think an emotional response is intended to change what caused it.
On a more serious note leaving out the God part this is more the thing:
God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.
You cannot change what is in the past even if it's a second ago, so there is no sense in getting excited about things that have already happened. If something that just happened pissed you off as yourself if getting pissed of will make things better, if it will not then don't. If you just had a fender bender getting angry or sad about it will not get your car fixed but a call to the police and your insurance agent will.
You can't change other people having an emotional response. So it seems by your reasoning your annoyance is unwarranted.
And since you failed to qualify anything, I'm simply trying to figure out what you're thinking and trying to understand it.
Ok, so it is acceptable to you to have an emotional response in some cases. Perhaps you could describe situations in which is isn't acceptable to you? Also, I still don't understand why you think an emotional response is intended to change what caused it.
You are either not reading my post or being obtuse, which is it?
I'm not clear how mobilehaathi's request for clarification of the position espoused in the post is obtuse.
Why not just answer his question, rather than fatuous name calling?
The NSA eavesdropping on millions of phone calls in Germany. What are we? The enemy?
You are either not reading my post or being obtuse, which is it?
My apologies, you gave an example of a fender bender, and I failed to remember that.
Why do you think that someone getting angry after a fender bender intends to use that anger to change what happened?
Then why get angry at all?
The premise of your question is what I am asking you about. You seem to think the only reason to have an emotional response to something is in order to change it. Why?
Negative, I asked the question, and I've answered yours already.
World hunger, poverty and False Metal.
Petty forum bickering that goes on for more than 2 posts each.
News stories online that are video only, and especially the ones that won't ever play!