Well, first of all, that's "according to interpretations of scripture", and, secondly, that implies that everyone who isn't asexual commits adultery.
Which is unreasonable.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What do you consider to be cheating?
- Thread starter Leareth
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Which is unreasonable.
That's why I run background checks on any chick that I go out with. Very cautious in today's world.
That's creepy...
That doesn't sound like it constitutes a trend to me, reading one article about it online. Sounds like a guy's wish list.
I think that most people love their parents and siblings, and would be affectionate to them in a manner that, while not sexual at all, would be sufficiently grating on a significant other if was done to non-family members, of the opposite sex.
That's why I run background checks on any chick that I go out with. Very cautious in today's world.
Freaky.
the article spoke to lawyers who specialized in arranging the marriages, and they said they the rate of these types of arrangements has been increasing at high rate over the last two years.
so that is a trend.
You could also rephrase my first comment to something along the lines of: If you are diverting emotional or physical resources away from your relationship and into a new encounter, you are cheating your relationship.
Then again, you could also rephrase my second comment:
Blanche = That is so cheating. I declare!
Rose = Back in St. Olaf, we'd call that cheating.
Sophia = Picture it...cheating.
Dorothy = You'd just be cheating yourself, Stan.
BJs are a feeding, they are not cheating. Would you think your girlfriend was cheating if she had a protein shake with someone?
I really hope you are joking.
And yes if I had a GF and she gave someone a BJ I would consider it cheating.
If I gave a guy a BJ then yes it would be cheating on a partner whether my partner be male or female.
FYI I am female.
you are joking, right?
No kissing above the neck.
there are many places below the neck...
i don't have a exact definition of cheating. but at the point of physical contact, it has already far past that point. i think cheating is somewhere close to the thought of allowing yourself even think seriously about doing "things*" with another person, or thinking to yourself that it's OK to do these "things". you don't technically even need to have the 3rd person to constitute to cheating.
*i think we don't need to discuss what these things are, it's kind of common sense.
No kissing above the neck.
That's probably a good policy.
Consider how many married people kiss a** at work all day.
If neither of you have an orgasm, it's not sex and it's not cheating. Rather, it's just a penis and vagina touching each other.
Feel free to write that one down.
Feel free to write that one down.
L
Lau
Guest
You and 240 million other Americans...
[Maude] God'll get you for that! [/Maude]C'mon why try hide it - you know you want the one one the left...
Son of a gun! Bill Clinton is a member here!
