Becasue each iteration drops support for older hardware, giving loyal customers the choice between no security updates and buy new hardware.How does a 12 month OS update cadence make apple more money when OS updates are free?
It takes an extraordinary level of cynicism to assert that excluding software update support for 10 year old computers is a tactic to make more money — especially when that level of support is industry-leading and comes from a company that is verifiably security focused. And it takes a similarly unusual level of entitlement to expect all new features to be available on older hardware.Becasue each iteration drops support for older hardware, giving loyal customers the choice between no security updates and buy new hardware.
Each iteration usually also adds a few features limited to new hardware, creating the illusion among customers that hardware just a few years old is obsolete.
Your claim of 10 years is wide off the mark.It takes an extraordinary level of cynicism to assert that excluding software update support for 10 year old computers is a tactic to make more money — especially when that level of support is industry-leading and comes from a company that is verifiably security focused. And it takes a similarly unusual level of entitlement to expect all new features to be available on older hardware.
Let just call the OS longevity 6 years. So with annual updates the life spans is 6 updates, with 18 month updates the longevity is 4 updates, with 24 month updates the longevity is 3 updates. But in all 3 cases it comes out to 6 years. Assuming the hardware is replaced at the end of the OS longevity, it is still replaced at the same 6 year rate. So how is this making Apple lose money again?Your claim of 10 years is wide off the mark.
Counting from relase date of a computer model, there is on average 6,6 years of macos updates and around 2 more years of security patches.
For a consumer buying a model a few months before discontinuation ( a date never published before the actual discontinuation) gets on average only 5,5 years of os updates.
![]()
How long will the last Intel Macs be supported? macOS Sonoma gives us some hints
Nearly 20 years of data show how Intel Macs are faring as Apple switches chips.arstechnica.com
No one is expecting new features that depend on new hardware to magically be installed via software update. But there certainly are software features actively developed and marketed with every major OS release that is unavailable on macs just a few years old that has the needed hardware.
Apple spends a lot of money and energy marketing every major os-release and I think they have fostered customers to have a very high rate of newest os adoption.
I never said it was a tactic to make more money. The question was "How does a 12 month OS update cadence make apple more money when OS updates are free?" and the answer was that even free upgrades drive revenue because you need to buy new hardware to get your free upgrade. There is nothing cynical about this fact. I'm writing this from a perfectly fine macbook air bought in 2019 where the hardware performs adequately but with OS and security nearing end-of-life.
If I started to get "check battery" messages from the OS, would I invest more money in this machine that "has no future" regarding os and security patches? Personally I might, but my take is that most consumers wouldn't. They would invest in new hardware despite current hardware being OK, and the EOL software and security is a part of that decision.
Does Apple keep computer specs aligned with chip upgrades? Would they do a Thunderbolt 5 M3 Studio or wait to refresh everything with M4?
Good question. I might have to wait for an M4, which could be paired with a refresh of their display lineup. The point where Thunderbolt 5 is offered though is the point where I'm upgrading due to the monitor capabilities it adds.Does Apple keep computer specs aligned with chip upgrades? Would they do a Thunderbolt 5 M3 Studio or wait to refresh everything with M4?
I would also like to see an overhaul of AirPlay to allow for hi res audio and, as you mentioned, a feature similar to Spotify Connect/Tidal Connect/Casting/ Amazon Connect. By the way, AirPlay 2 will add lossy compression to their lossless files when being sent to AirPlay 2 compatible streamers…quite ridiculous.Greatly expand and improve Siri to be useful for something other than playing music and controlling your smart home.
A Spotify connect like devices we can put at our stereo systems. Something we can control from our iDevices and play back lossless audio directly from Apple Music avoiding Airplay.
* When I remove albums/songs from my library don't remove songs from playlists. Sheesh!
I shudder to think what I’ll do when my 7th gen iPod Touch eventually gives up.Bring back the iPod