Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
One way to advance the iPad as a replacement for "real computers" is to reduce ports and interfaces on laptops and desktops to the point that the iPad really can be a replacement. The latest Apple laptops are so small, thin, and portless as to look sort of like toys. That's really the impression I get when looking at the laptops students are using at a local university, where it's the case that many are choosing high quality PC laptops over MacBooks . They really need and use the ports.

Lol this wrong. College students barely know how to use a computer (besides computer science majors and a few others). Most just write their papers on a laptop and could do very little else. The idea that they plug in more than the laptop charger is laughable.

They don’t even need flash drives to take to the computer lab to print... they all use google documents and just open it from wherever they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
You can easily differentiate the two...
...and if they do release a new Mini next week, the differentiation will be:
  • Mini: exists; Pro: doesn't exist
If there isn't so much as a preview of the Pro next week, will anybody who actually needs one still be waiting for it? "Pro" tends to imply that people need it to earn money.

dGPU - Mini no, Pro yes

I wonder if Apple are going to do anything with the Intel + AMD Vega packages? They're not Pro fodder, but they might be a contender for the Mini...
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
The current mini is not so mini by today's standards. I think it could have a smaller consumer version, about the size of an Intel NUC. We no longer need a box the size of a CD-ROM, because we have no rotating disks anymore. Then they should also have a bigger Pro version with a real GPU, with amazing cooling, so that it doesn't have to throttle after a second. It's like ultrabook versus workstation. I would buy the really mini for my parents, and a real high end one for myself. I don't think it's going to happen, though. Apple makes more money by selling a display with the machine.
The mini is still plenty small as it has an internal power supply. All the other SFF computers like the NUC have external power bricks that are quite large.
 
If they release a new mini that is at least the equivalent of my 2012 2.3 i7 16GB I'm in. My cMP 3.46 hex works great but is stuck on High Sierra. USB3/TB3 is what I'm looking for. TB3 added to the current mini but with newer processors will not do. The idea of a more pro mini really strikes me as something I really want to order at the first opportunity.
 
Hope they’re right (on all fronts) about the iPad Mini. I still think it’s the prefect size... and I would just as soon they leave the bezels (and Touch ID! ... and the headphone jack!) alone and keep the price low.

- Typed on an iPad Mini 4

Except I don't want a lower cost (=lower quality) screen.
 
Am I the only person who doesn't want a bezeless iPad? I mean I need something to hold onto..... Or am I gonna have to put a pop socket on an iPad? lol
You definitely are not the only one. When held with one hand, your thumb literally would have nowhere to go. I’m sure I’m not the only person who carries an iPad around with one hand sometimes.
 
The mini is still plenty small as it has an internal power supply. All the other SFF computers like the NUC have external power bricks that are quite large.

I totally agree. The self-contained power supply is one of the great advantages of the mini, Apple TV and Time Capsule. BTW, a thousand poxes on Apple for not releasing a new Time Capsule with the latest wifi innovations and an 8TB storage option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
It’s sad that I’m about 10x more excited for this iPad and Mac reveal than any other Apple event in the past year. New USB-C iPad, MacBook Air, and Mac Mini all have the potential to be genuinely innovative.

But at the end of the day, it’s an Apple event in 2018, so I’ll keep my expectations low and probably still be disappointed.
 
Lol this wrong. College students barely know how to use a computer (besides computer science majors and a few others). Most just write their papers on a laptop and could do very little else. The idea that they plug in more than the laptop charger is laughable.

They don’t even need flash drives to take to the computer lab to print... they all use google documents and just open it from wherever they are.

Very true, my anecdotal experience is they mostly write papers, check email and follow social media. I've recommended Airs with LibreOffice as a viable machine that is reliable and powerful enough for most students. Sure, some majors require more computing power or have to run a specific Win based program, but those are edge cases.

There a lot of choices at the $1000 price point; am partial to Macs because of build quality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
I totally agree. The self-contained power supply is one of the great advantages of the mini, Apple TV and Time Capsule. BTW, a thousand poxes on Apple for not releasing a new Time Capsule with the latest wifi innovations and an 8TB storage option.

I'll second that. My Mini is still running 24/7 with no problems in it's an old Core 2 that I used to run iTunes to access media on an AppleTV. I'm only retiring it because I can run an iTunes server on my NAS and serve video to my Apple TV via a Plex server and inFuse.
 
You can easily differentiate the two...
  • ECC RAM - Mini no, Pro yes
  • More than 32 Gigs of RAM - Mini no, Pro yes
  • dGPU - Mini no, Pro yes - People will tout eGPU, but you really lose 25-30% performance going with an external, and power users who NEED the graphics power are not going to go this route
  • More than 4-6 CPU cores - Mini no, Pro yes - depends on how much Apple wants to give the mini users, I have my doubts about even getting 6 cores, given the past screw job
People get hung up over ‘pro’ versus power. The mini is not going to hold a candle to the Pro, but it certainly can be MUCH more powerful/useful for many more purposes than it currently is.

When Tim thinks "pro" he means advanced/semi-pro like a MacBook Pro, not ultra heavy-duty but very nice for most of us.
 
The AirPower is probably a no show again, considering the recent event was about the new iPhone that would have been the perfect time to announce to say something about it.
 
what to expect:

every single mac has a t2 chip

by 2021 you can’t install new mac os without one

(before you say “they sell new macs without them now so they’ll be supported for more than three years....

they sold the last g5 imac until january 2006

the last is it can run is 10.5 (leopard) so by 10.6 (snow leopard) 2009 it was done )
 
Remember what they did to the 2014 Mini? I’d expect them to similarly cripple/close off this new one as well.

I see no reason to upgrade from my 2012 i7 16GB mini with a 256gb ssd and 1TB spinner. It would have to be something really compelling.... Quite frankly, Apple has jumped the shark. What they’ve done to their entire computer line has been disgraceful.
 
One more chance to laugh at $1000+ Mac with 5400rpm spinning hard drive

I'd like to believe that, if Tuesday is indeed about Macs in the least, that one of the things that gets changed (and helps justify the overall pricing) is that the entire lineup transitions to SSD. Knowing Apple, they'll "throw us a bone" on that front, but put 64GB versions in, stock, and then still charge arm-and-a-leg pricing to upgrade to anything reasonable.

"Hey, you said you wanted SSDs in our desktops...voila! You're welcome. - Your pal, Tim"

Grrr...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
I wonder if the rumored 13” inch is in fact a bigger version of 12” inch MacBook with more ports (basically a potential substitute for Air some of us wanted in the first place) and the rumored “low cost” machine is just 12 inch MacBook with reduced price?
 
The biggest advantage for Apple is tighter integration between hardware and software. They’ve always wanted to design and control the whole device. I don’t think ARM Macs will last as long as Intel based devices, so 6 years is a stretch in my mind.

That said, I’d be shocked if Apple announces an ARM based Mac. I have no doubt that they are working on Macs powered by their own chips, but I find it very hard to believe that they are going to port MacOS X, with all of its legacy technology, to their own chips. They’re only now starting to produce chips that could deliver Mac-level performance. Porting the OS is a big job.

A Mac based on iOS makes much more sense in my mind, but I don’t think we’re close to that yet.

Lol since 2002 OSX (or this bs named macOS; incorrect that is died should not have been named back), has been cpu agnostic!

Apple scheduled 12mths for porting from Power architecture to Intel x86 and completed their lineup in 7-9mths! Shipping products not announced in that time frame.

Apple can most definitely increase the cores or stack does to get 8-10-12-16 core A12’s or new designed chips wiring in a team and quickly use Xcode/Seift to port the kernel over.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.