I always expect disappointment, and I haven’t been disappointed in years.
Last edited:
One way to advance the iPad as a replacement for "real computers" is to reduce ports and interfaces on laptops and desktops to the point that the iPad really can be a replacement. The latest Apple laptops are so small, thin, and portless as to look sort of like toys. That's really the impression I get when looking at the laptops students are using at a local university, where it's the case that many are choosing high quality PC laptops over MacBooks . They really need and use the ports.
...and if they do release a new Mini next week, the differentiation will be:You can easily differentiate the two...
dGPU - Mini no, Pro yes
The mini is still plenty small as it has an internal power supply. All the other SFF computers like the NUC have external power bricks that are quite large.The current mini is not so mini by today's standards. I think it could have a smaller consumer version, about the size of an Intel NUC. We no longer need a box the size of a CD-ROM, because we have no rotating disks anymore. Then they should also have a bigger Pro version with a real GPU, with amazing cooling, so that it doesn't have to throttle after a second. It's like ultrabook versus workstation. I would buy the really mini for my parents, and a real high end one for myself. I don't think it's going to happen, though. Apple makes more money by selling a display with the machine.
Hope they’re right (on all fronts) about the iPad Mini. I still think it’s the prefect size... and I would just as soon they leave the bezels (and Touch ID! ... and the headphone jack!) alone and keep the price low.
- Typed on an iPad Mini 4
You definitely are not the only one. When held with one hand, your thumb literally would have nowhere to go. I’m sure I’m not the only person who carries an iPad around with one hand sometimes.Am I the only person who doesn't want a bezeless iPad? I mean I need something to hold onto..... Or am I gonna have to put a pop socket on an iPad? lol
The mini is still plenty small as it has an internal power supply. All the other SFF computers like the NUC have external power bricks that are quite large.
Lol this wrong. College students barely know how to use a computer (besides computer science majors and a few others). Most just write their papers on a laptop and could do very little else. The idea that they plug in more than the laptop charger is laughable.
They don’t even need flash drives to take to the computer lab to print... they all use google documents and just open it from wherever they are.
I totally agree. The self-contained power supply is one of the great advantages of the mini, Apple TV and Time Capsule. BTW, a thousand poxes on Apple for not releasing a new Time Capsule with the latest wifi innovations and an 8TB storage option.
You can easily differentiate the two...
People get hung up over ‘pro’ versus power. The mini is not going to hold a candle to the Pro, but it certainly can be MUCH more powerful/useful for many more purposes than it currently is.
- ECC RAM - Mini no, Pro yes
- More than 32 Gigs of RAM - Mini no, Pro yes
- dGPU - Mini no, Pro yes - People will tout eGPU, but you really lose 25-30% performance going with an external, and power users who NEED the graphics power are not going to go this route
- More than 4-6 CPU cores - Mini no, Pro yes - depends on how much Apple wants to give the mini users, I have my doubts about even getting 6 cores, given the past screw job
That doesn't have an entry fee of five kilobucks.All I want is a user-upgradeable Mac Pro with PCIe!
All I need from this is a new Mac mini, all I'm probably going to get is another iPad and a pencil.
One more chance to laugh at $1000+ Mac with 5400rpm spinning hard drive
Except I don't want a lower cost (=lower quality) screen.
The biggest advantage for Apple is tighter integration between hardware and software. They’ve always wanted to design and control the whole device. I don’t think ARM Macs will last as long as Intel based devices, so 6 years is a stretch in my mind.
That said, I’d be shocked if Apple announces an ARM based Mac. I have no doubt that they are working on Macs powered by their own chips, but I find it very hard to believe that they are going to port MacOS X, with all of its legacy technology, to their own chips. They’re only now starting to produce chips that could deliver Mac-level performance. Porting the OS is a big job.
A Mac based on iOS makes much more sense in my mind, but I don’t think we’re close to that yet.