So that photo you're retouching (while you think about it) has to be 120fps? that (static) spreadsheet has to be 120fps.. jesus give me a break
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What to Expect at Apple's September 2019 Event: New iPhones, Apple Watch Models, Services Updates and More
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
If Apple doesn't eat the Trump tariff, they're going to feel it in the form of declining sales
[doublepost=1567898546][/doublepost]
You're assuming that.
[doublepost=1567898624][/doublepost]
"If a new SE comes out with the same camera as the current XR with an A12 or faster and is water resistant like the iPhone 8 is, and offers 64 or 128GB then I’ll be taking a very interested look at it, big screen phones are great for that screen size but very cumbersome in all other ways... for me the 6, 7, 8 were the best size offered."
I agree.
You've missed the point if your eyes can happily see a movie at 24fps at the cimama why can't those same eyes view content on a computer screen? I don't give a damn whait the computer renders it because that's an arms war "hey we're doing 124fps! now we're going 256fps etc etc"
No doubt... higher prices—>reduced demand—>recession.
It’s just my opinion. I also think Ive’s designed (not necessarily every aspect singlehandedly, he does work with a team) every iPhone Apple’s ever released. Since Apple works two to three years ahead, it stands to reason we’ll see Ive’s stamp on some number upcoming models, even if his new studio doesn’t do any design work on future iPhones.
Next year’s 5.42” OLED won’t be as tall or wide as the 6/7/8; it’ll be the perfect size as far as I’m concerned. The new “SE” might be smaller or larger, but it’ll definitely be much cheaper, maybe half the price.
As the tariff would come right off the top of Apple’s net margin, there’s no way they’re going to eat it.
I'd spend my spare time holidays driving, walking and climbing the hills of the Highlands and Islands of Scotland, to get away from the constant bullying I got at work/school taking Landscapes. It was not unusual to set up a photo the just sit there with camera on a tripod waiting for for the right lighting conditions. then take several shots on different settings to make sure I got the right one. No instant digital images and NO photoshop.
2019 iPhone = Antonio Brown. The product is fundamentally good, the price is ridiculous, the hype is sh*t, and in the end, it’s just not worth it for any reason.
Apparently you don’t understand the difference between frame rate and refresh rate. When people talk about computer displays they’re talking about the refresh rate. Too low of a refresh rate appears as “flickering” and can cause eye strain or headaches. Some people find 60Hz perfectly fine while others can notice it as flickering.
It’s also the same reason some people don’t like OLED screens as they can notice the PWM used to control brightness.
It’s reasonable for someone who is more sensitive to this flicker to hope a device they’re considering offers a higher refresh rate.
I might think that they still stand firm from Ming Chi Kuo quotes several months back .. although not entirely mention about the month of September Event.
As an aside... I don't like OLED screens, at least on my X, due to the color shift when the display is tilted a few degrees. I much prefer the LCD display on my 6+.
I think most Apple events have been a big 'meh' lately. So now, they're doubling down with the word innovation, when there's nothing in this preview that could warrant a 'can't innovate, my ass.." line from Phil Schiller.
My fear - given that there's a 3-D look to the colorful Apple Logo - is that Apple is going all in an AR - which will probably someday be big - but it's not today. And Apple's innovative track record of non-existent AirPower, TouchBars, scratch-able IonX glass, and self-destructing Butterfly keyboards have me betting they won't come up with a compelling offering if they try it.
Seems like another year when Apple won't get a sale out of me then. As my SE ages, I might have to consider Android as I can't see myself buying an iPhone 7 or 8 as the tech in those phones is severely dated. The XR and XS are still far too expensive when you can get a good laptop for less.
There's got to be a point where they introduce two-year old FaceID technology to the lower end of the iPhone lineup.
"Frame rate (expressed in frames per second or FPS) is the frequency (rate) at which consecutive images called frames appear on a display. The term applies equally to film and video cameras, computer graphics, and motion capture systems. Frame rate may also be called the frame frequency, and be expressed in hertz."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_rate
There is no difference between the two (unless you're a marketing man)
Pretty much the only reason for me to like these rumored camera system is this sort of stuff. Low light sucks, double on video, the whole auto focus on video they hyped sucks as well, especially if you are moving while filming, stabilization is nil. Using different focal lengths at once reminds me of the Lytro plenoptic cameras which would be a cool feature to have. Although I’d want it in the base app not having to buy something (or at least if I have to buy it’s a plugin to the camera app and not a totally separate one)
They’re not the same. Frame rate can refer to the source material while refresh rate refers to the output capabilities of the monitor. Between, frames have to be sampled to achieve the output frame rate. If you want to achieve the same effect as with a shutter angle, you will have to sample at a much higher rate as the refresh rate and then convolute them into a single frame, equivalently to the process of anti aliasing (which is also why where the term temporal aliasing comes from). I could go on explaining Fourier transformations and how they explain any kind of aliasing, but I will spare you that.
I explained to you already, why the refresh rate matters even with matching shutter angles, but you decided to ignore my post. Instead, you continue to spread your own misinformed truth while being off topic
Last edited:
Think they should drop the numbering for the iPhones and just refer to them by year.
iPhone 11 = iPhone 2019
iPhone 11 Pro = iPhone 2019 Pro
iPhone 11R = iPhone 2019 R
Etc.
But then I also think they should be doing that with the iOS / WatchOS / TVOS etc as well.
Then you'd have a unified 2020 range, 2021 range, etc.
iPhone 11 = iPhone 2019
iPhone 11 Pro = iPhone 2019 Pro
iPhone 11R = iPhone 2019 R
Etc.
But then I also think they should be doing that with the iOS / WatchOS / TVOS etc as well.
Then you'd have a unified 2020 range, 2021 range, etc.
Apple will announce one more thing ... The "Mac". Scaled down MacPro with an 5K iMac monitor.
*wakesupfromawonderfuldream*
*wakesupfromawonderfuldream*
If the new iPhone has SIGNIFICANTLY better battery life I will buy it. If not, I'll suffer with my current one no matter what else they throw in there. I'm sick and tired of having to recharge my phone twice a day (plus overnight).
Pretty much the same with the 16" Macbook Proletariat. Working over 2m away from the nearest power socket for more than two hours is pretty much impossible. The battery might last a bit longer but then it'd be empty the next time I pull it out of my bag and that can't be allowed to happen.
I wish they'd pull their head out of their backsides and made devices you can actually use instead of doing whatever they can to make them slimmer.
Pretty much the same with the 16" Macbook Proletariat. Working over 2m away from the nearest power socket for more than two hours is pretty much impossible. The battery might last a bit longer but then it'd be empty the next time I pull it out of my bag and that can't be allowed to happen.
I wish they'd pull their head out of their backsides and made devices you can actually use instead of doing whatever they can to make them slimmer.