Always on and OLED is not a good combination. Or have the solved the image burn in problem that plagued OLED since it's inception?To me, that sounds like they’re bringing standby to the iPad with a new dock, and it’ll be always on because of OLED.
And hopefully update the desktop era enclosure. Get rid of the power cord, halve the size, improve heat sink passive cooling, and add a battery. And also release new portable inexpensive display options to go with it.I hope they release out the mac mini m3 for $499
It is the current design that is not user friendly.They have been selling the latest remote seperately so idhope any future design could also bepurchased for an olde Apple TV 😀
Nothing, but if your in the market for a new device why do you want one that 1.5 Yrs + old.What would an upgraded apple TV do that the current ones cant considering Apple TV OS and the lineup of Apps is the limiting factor
The base MacBook Pro and the MacBook Air have long had a strange relationship...That would cannibalize their base Macbook Pro customers.
You wouldn't necessarily want one thats old but it will come to a point when they will update them less often. Thats if their environmental claims are genuine. Updating devices to chase sales only gets you so far, especially if the software is the weak aspect and needs to catch up.Nothing, but if your in the market for a new device why do you want one that 1.5 Yrs + old.
I personally believe that if they absolutely have to have a cut down model (sub $1k) to save cost, 12GB should be the minimum, if not 16. The pros should start at 24 or 32. I think Apple is doing itself a disservice by selling devices with 8GB of RAM, in the way of long-term experience of their users. Some people don't care what the specs are, but they definitely know if their $1600 device isn't performing well after a year or two of use, and that will stick with them for a long time.The base MacBook Pro and the MacBook Air have long had a strange relationship...
Meanwhile, 8GB in a $1600 MacBook Pro is just as ridiculous as 8GB in a $1200 MacBook Air - and the longer this goes on, the more ridiculous it gets. All the base M3s should have 16GB/512GB minimum. If you don't need that you probably don't need an M3 (the M1 Airs are good little machines).
The MacBook Air at the $1200 price point has been stuck at 8GB/256GB since 2017, when that was a reasonable spec, but since then most of its other specs have increased significantly (as you would expect from evolving tech) yet the RAM and SSD have stubbornly remained fixed and immune to industry changes. In 2024, comparably-priced PCs using comparable LPDDR RAM and comparable fast SSDs increasingly come with at least 16/512 and/or far cheaper BTO upgrades than Apple offer - and we're talking about other manufacturer's premium ultraportable ranges - XPS, ThinkPad, EliteBook etc. Increasingly, only sub-$1000 flying bricks come with 8/256.
M1 (any machine) starting at 8GB ~2020, maybe. M2 starting at 8GB ~2022 - pushing it. Having the M3 starting at only 8GB in 2023/4 (inc MBP and iMac) is a joke. These are premium machines and they are supposed to have premium features. 16GB of RAM, even LPDDRX5, just isn't that expensive today and on any other platform paring anything as powerful as an M3 with only 8GB of RAM would be a false economy. While Apple's implementation - with the RAM soldered atop the processor - may be unusual, there's no evidence that the actual (probably Samsung) LPDDR chips it uses are unique in any way.
At some stage, Apple will have to up its base to 16GB. The longer they wait, the more they narrow their potential market to existing Apple converts who will just put their hands in their pockets.
Why did you expect anything in the M4 this early? Apple has yet to even fully implement the M3. You might not even see the M4 this year, so don’t expect many rumors before April/May.Interesting no chatter about the M4 chip so far, with M1, M2, and M3 there was a lot of chatter leading up to them. Have a feeling average Apple buyer is realizing Apple has hit the point of diminishing return for them.
12 GB base would be more than enough for the “Air” models, while bumping “Pro” machines to 16 GB seems logical. Might finally see a bump in 2025 with the M4.The base MacBook Pro and the MacBook Air have long had a strange relationship...
Meanwhile, 8GB in a $1600 MacBook Pro is just as ridiculous as 8GB in a $1200 MacBook Air - and the longer this goes on, the more ridiculous it gets. All the base M3s should have 16GB/512GB minimum. If you don't need that you probably don't need an M3 (the M1 Airs are good little machines).
The MacBook Air at the $1200 price point has been stuck at 8GB/256GB since 2017, when that was a reasonable spec, but since then most of its other specs have increased significantly (as you would expect from evolving tech) yet the RAM and SSD have stubbornly remained fixed and immune to industry changes. In 2024, comparably-priced PCs using comparable LPDDR RAM and comparable fast SSDs increasingly come with at least 16/512 and/or far cheaper BTO upgrades than Apple offer - and we're talking about other manufacturer's premium ultraportable ranges - XPS, ThinkPad, EliteBook etc. Increasingly, only sub-$1000 flying bricks come with 8/256.
M1 (any machine) starting at 8GB ~2020, maybe. M2 starting at 8GB ~2022 - pushing it. Having the M3 starting at only 8GB in 2023/4 (inc MBP and iMac) is a joke. These are premium machines and they are supposed to have premium features. 16GB of RAM, even LPDDRX5, just isn't that expensive today and on any other platform paring anything as powerful as an M3 with only 8GB of RAM would be a false economy. While Apple's implementation - with the RAM soldered atop the processor - may be unusual, there's no evidence that the actual (probably Samsung) LPDDR chips it uses are unique in any way.
At some stage, Apple will have to up its base to 16GB. The longer they wait, the more they narrow their potential market to existing Apple converts who will just put their hands in their pockets.
What would an upgraded apple TV do that the current ones cant considering Apple TV OS and the lineup of Apps is the limiting factor
If they were serious about it being for gaming they woukd probably put M3 at least in it, considering the hardware ray tracing etcIt could sport an M1 chip and support that resident evil remake perhaps.![]()
That I wouldn't mind. My saving up for a new pro-level Mac Mini had to be greatly postponed, since I currently need to replace my car.No new Mac mini?
I like the post on YouTube
The OLED display dimensions are likely thinner, the iPad doesn't need to be as thick compared to the current panel. Also using a padded sleeve case for the iPad Pro while being transported in a backpack might help with risk. The fact that he had to demonstrate this as a huge mistake means he is bored today.Max Tech in one month: "Apple new M3 iPad Pro: I was wrong
I think for the average Mac user the jump from Intel to M1 is a huge leap and satisfies them and will satisfy them for years to come. I bet if anyone went back to using an Intel machine for a couple of days they would miss their M1 a lot.Going from intel to M1 was a huge upgrade, wonder if it's worth it to go for M3