so you understand my point. ECG is not regulated or allowed for use in many countries - it doesn’t mean that’s a permanent condition. So why create a new hardware JUST to be cheaper when a model WITH existing features and hardware capabilities already exists?!
- increased R&D for yet a new production lineup.
- increased shipping costs and logistics for supply chain and deliveries.
- increased analysis internally for another product which duplicates what’s already supplying the need for the same market segment.
the existing $199 already works for you. Eventually depending on deals and internal health bureaus of your country and with Apple to come together, said features will be available. You’d kick yourself in 2yrs to find out it’s enabled as rarely Watch buyers buy or should by new every iteration since S3.
by your statement ‘it would be sweet for people like me’ why would Apple have to remove features for the S4 to be cheaper and create a new product with the associated costs to bring it to makret? One already exists with the features which they can offer at a cheaper price. Heck they can do this even with refurbishing existing S4’s
the Watch was to bring features not remove them. Creating a new one to remove basically creates the mindset for users still not tech savvy wanting a watch to compare the $199 (hypothetical Watch SE price) to a Fitbit at $179 doing the same things - even with blood oxygen measurement n sleep tracking. The difference is more compatible with Android devices than Watch is. This is another area where it lessens the brand. Watch can and could be a halo affect leading to an iOS purchase for a potential non Apple buyer.
lots of pints of my views provided. Their not right nor wrong hat points of view/perception.