Link me to this fantasy please?you can buy add on shelves for monitors. could suit your need.
Link me to this fantasy please?you can buy add on shelves for monitors. could suit your need.
referenceMark my words:
iPad Mini - A18 chip only
iMac - M4, 12gb Ram
MBP base - M4, 12gb ram
MBP real one - M4 only
We are getting closer to seeing the end of 8GB Macs due to AI, and the multiple caches of OS, CPU/GPU, browser tabs, and now AI. Yes you can still work with 8GB, but it's not desirable for the next few years. Even when the 24" iMac first came out people working with video editing quickly found that 16 GB even was not the best. 24 GB was a bandaid, iMac really needs to offer 16 GB DRAM min and 32 GB DRAM for video/audio editing that some like to use it for.The M4 iMac could start with 16GB RAM instead of 8GB, perhaps to better support Apple Intelligence features. All of the M4 Macs that have been spotted in developer logs have either 16GB or 32GB RAM.
No, in my feeble mind at least, the simplest explanation is that, for whatever reason, InFO-LSI advanced packaging was not an option for the singular N3 (N3B) node in the first place. So M3 was designed around that contingency: no Ultra.Well, Occam's Razor says it was because they weren't planning to update the Studio or Mac Pro during the M3's lifetime. They're not going to make chips for machines they don't make...
I do, however, wonder if the "ultrafusion" concept really has legs, esp. for multiple-SoC designs where you're doubling everything up for the sake of getting more CPU and GPU cores. It means that your basic die has to be designed to serve a dual purpose as a viable stand-alone SoC and a building block for fusion systems - which is likely to add redundancy. For personal workstation workloads, adding cores tends to have diminishing returns, so maybe designing a slightly larger chip with a couple of extra CPU or GPU cores is more cost effective than doubling everything up. Also, sounds like they ran out of spatial dimensions when trying to make a 4-chip "Extreme" version...
The A18 would be the minimum SoC to expect. Likely the iPad mini 7 aims at entertainment aka video playback/games usages that the update to A18 would add AV1 decoding, GPU ray tracing/mesh shading, and Dynamic caching. I don't want to see a M1 or M2 as those SoC lack all those hardware capabilities, which is why the 2024 M2 Air was a strange choice by Apple?I'll be shocked if the iPad mini doesn't have an A18 in it.
Doesn’t mean what was spotted will be production and it doesn’t say which M4 Macs. Why give an iMac 16gb when it probably doesn’t even sell enough to warrant it? You all are expecting too much as always.reference
![]()
iMac: Just Updated With M4 Chip! Features, Price, and Buying Advice
Apple's iMac is an ultra-thin all-in-one desktop computer that was refreshed with the new M4 chip, a minimum of 16GB of memory, a nano-texture...www.macrumors.com
We are getting closer to seeing the end of 8GB Macs due to AI, and the multiple caches of OS, CPU/GPU, browser tabs, and now AI. Yes you can still work with 8GB, but it's not desirable for the next few years. Even when the 24" iMac first came out people working with video editing quickly found that 16 GB even was not the best. 24 GB was a bandaid, iMac really needs to offer 16 GB DRAM min and 32 GB DRAM for video/audio editing that some like to use it for.
Most people bought the iMac with 16GB over the 8GB. It was like just $200 more, but another $200 for 8GB more for 24GB?Doesn’t mean what was spotted will be production and it doesn’t say which M4 Macs. Why give an iMac 16gb when it probably doesn’t even sell enough to warrant it? You all are expecting too much as always.
Link me to this fantasy please?![]()
Looking forward to seeing what the new Mac mini has to offer.
I am growing tired of the non 4K Apple TV I have with regards to not being able to permanently pair with HomePods like my 4K can (WHY!!!!?????), and it having a recent issue with remotes, loading content, and overall speed.
I don't suspect forced obsolescence, but I do suspect that Apple isn't giving that model full attention. I would prefer to have a Mac-Mini in my main living room, and turn it into a local server as well as being a media consumption device. Move the old 4K to my kitchen where my non 4K is driving me nuts!
They are both 5.0.older Bluetooth standard on the non4K one?
Older version Bluetooth on the older non4K one?
I really wish they'd grow their line of displays beyond the two they offer. (One, really, if you factor out the nosebleed-priced Pro Display XDR.)Same. Big question for me now is what monitor to pair with a new M4 Mac mini.
It’s time for a complete redesign. From a design perspective they’re sleek and beautiful but functionally they’re lacking. A trillion dollar company should do better …I really hope so, they should have switched years ago.
Nobody outside Apple can answer that question. The mockups are just guesses. We don't even actually know if this product is real.Will that Mac mini fit up under the Studio Display like the current design does? Seems kind of tall in All the mockups.
Apple would probably give you less than $200.00 unless it’s really speced out. Keep it and just buy the M4. I just bought base m2 and it’s only worth $220.00 as trade in. Not wanting to sell just came up as a trade in option while upgrading another product.I want to sell my M1 mac mini if it’s true the mac mini M4 will get 16GB as the base model but it sounds too good to be true
Yep. As someone with 4 Mac Studio Ultras it is essentially two glued mobile chips. But honestly, Apple keeps frustrating the pro market. I moved away after the 2013 trash can Mac Pro fiasco. I used an i9 iMac but I only had one mac at the time. I came back with the M1 Ultra Mac Studio and now I have 4 Studio Ultras. But now Apple will have M4 laptops and M2 desktops. They keep frustrating the desktop market. If it keeps up I will be moving back to Windows and I HATE HATE HATE HATE Windows.Well, if they're updating the MacBook Pro then we'll presumably get M4 Pro and M4 Max (or equivalent) versions of that.
I'm not sure that it is clear that there is even going to be a M4 Ultra in the old sense. The idea of the Max being a sort of universal die design where you could "chop off" half the GPU to make a Pro or join several together to make Ultra or Extreme seems to have ended with the M3: the M3 Pro and Max are now quite distinct dies, with the M3 Pro being more efficiency-focussed, the M3 Max having more cores and a higher ratio of performance to efficiency cores, and giving the M2 Ultra a run for its money. The rumors of a new high-end Apple Silicon chip sound more like a NVIDIA Grace/Hopper contender for AI development and services, rather than something for a personal AV workstation.
There don't seem to be any substantial rumours about the Mac Studio. I guess only Apple know how the Studio Ultra and 2023 Mac Pro have worked out in terms of sales or if the whole "ultrafusion" idea has been a flop (The Mac Pro seems to be using a whole second Max core primarily to get some PCIe lanes and extra RAM...) I wouldn't be surprised if the 2023 Mac Pro turned out to be the last "big box 'o' slots" Mac esp. if Thunderbolt 5 comes along and offers better bandwidth for external PCIe housings.
Personally, I think a M4 Max Mac Studio with various "binning" options would make a perfectly viable Studio range on its own, without waiting for an Ultra chip. If Apple think there is a market for a server-grade Mac they need to make a ground-up server grade chip rather than trying to glue laptop SoCs together.
They did they Mac Studio dirty with the M3 release. I regularly use my M3 Max Macbook Pro for GPU intensive tasks and especially ray-tracing. It is MUCH BETTER than my M2 Ultra maxed system and I am MASSIVELY PISSED I maxed that system out. I like to keep my system for many years, but I also need more performance. I would expect the top of the line desktop to NOT be outperformed in several tasks by a system half its price in one generation.We don’t know why there was no M3 Ultra. In retrospect, it looks like it was never in the cards. That allowed them to focus on the M3 Pro, to define it for the first time as something other than a variant of the Max.
I think the core idea of the Max as the building block remains, the reasoning behind the approach is sound, and we’ve got at least three generations of a straightforward Ultra ahead (M4, M5, M6). The nearest possible fork in the road is M7 in 2027. Until then, Apple will keep ratcheting up its pressure on the industry to keep up as the Max increases in both efficiency and performance, not to mention features.
In sum, I don’t think we’ll see a change in the MacBook Pro and Studio/Pro chassis until 2027 (at the earliest), until then it will be all about the silicon.
You are on to something. You mean i can get the bare bones new small mac mini and tuck it in under my tv?Looking forward to seeing what the new Mac mini has to offer.
I am growing tired of the non 4K Apple TV I have with regards to not being able to permanently pair with HomePods like my 4K can (WHY!!!!?????), and it having a recent issue with remotes, loading content, and overall speed.
I don't suspect forced obsolescence, but I do suspect that Apple isn't giving that model full attention. I would prefer to have a Mac-Mini in my main living room, and turn it into a local server as well as being a media consumption device. Move the old 4K to my kitchen where my non 4K is driving me nuts!