Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

What actions do you want?


  • Total voters
    576
24" 1920x1200 screens are over, they all became 22.x" and 21.5" 1080p screens so the manufacturers can get more screens out of a production run. With the increased pixel density of the 21.5 and 27 iMacs plus the MacBook Airs models, plus iPhone 4, it's not likely that there will be another 24" iMac.

How about 23.5" screens? They seem to be very popular all-in-one computers today.

That could also mean that the screen size is cheaper since it is mass produced.
 
I want some news now! I would really like the top model with ivy bridge. If anybody remembers last year, what kind of upgrade can we expect? Regarding GFX card and pricing in particular. Im expecting ivy bridge and a slight bump in gpu, thats it. Maybe 4gb as standard.
 
Last edited:
How about 23.5" screens? They seem to be very popular all-in-one computers today.

That could also mean that the screen size is cheaper since it is mass produced.

Dont really count on it. Especially if you think they would bother using 1920 by 1080 on those.
 
I want some news now! I would really like the top model with ivy bridge. If anybody remembers last year, what kind of upgrade can we expect? Regarding GFX card and pricing in particular. Im expecting ivy bridge and a slight bump in gpu, thats it. Maybe 4gb as standard.

same prices, minimal improvement in cpu performance (10%) but huge in gpu (50%) because of the new 28nm production process, expect 7970m from ati or similar from nvidia

and 4gb ram is standard
 
How about 23.5" screens? They seem to be very popular all-in-one computers today.

That could also mean that the screen size is cheaper since it is mass produced.

A 23.5" 1080p screen will not produce as sharp text and images as a 21.5" screen of the same resolution. Most people would consider it a downgrade to move to a larger screen with the same resolution. Although there are exceptions, such as people who want a larger screen for viewing movies or people with declining eyesight.

I expect the screen sizes and resolutions will stay the same for the 2012 models.
 
The ONLY thing I want for the new iMac is a standard HDD that doesnt have an integrated temp sensor. I was comfortable repairing my own iMacs myself, but a proprietary HDD means I have to go back to Apple for a HDD repair. How lame.

If I were dreaming, then I'd say give me faster RAM and a SATA III board with an eSATA port built in. I know TBolt would take care of that but nothing. Beats not having adaptors all over your desk.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

I saw this article does it mean the iMacs wont be hear till what's it say 2013 for Ivy Bridge? Another year?

http://www.hardmac.com/news/2012/02/06/about-xeon-ivy-bridge?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+hardmac+%28HardMac.com%29
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

I saw this article does it mean the iMacs wont be hear till what's it say 2013 for Ivy Bridge? Another year?

http://www.hardmac.com/news/2012/02...feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+hardmac+(HardMac.com)
Nope, that article is talking about Xeon (server-grade) processors. Considering that Sandy Bridge-E (SB's server- and enthusiast-grade processor line) just recently came out, the 2013-timeframe for SB-E's replacement seems about right.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

kfscoll said:
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

I saw this article does it mean the iMacs wont be hear till what's it say 2013 for Ivy Bridge? Another year?

http://www.hardmac.com/news/2012/02...feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+hardmac+(HardMac.com)
Nope, that article is talking about Xeon (server-grade) processors. Considering that Sandy Bridge-E (SB's server- and enthusiast-grade processor line) just recently came out, the 2013-timeframe for SB-E's replacement seems about right.

Ahh ok good to know thx clearing that up, was spooked there for a second lol
 
Imac sizing

Well thats too bad I think that 21.5 inch is to small but 27in is absolutly huge and expensive. I went the apple store and still cant decide.. I am mainly doing web design (so coding and a live preview and googling fixes and stuff all at once) as well as photoshop... what do others here think? any one here do web design? what size do you have?

Thanks guys:D:apple:
 
Well thats too bad I think that 21.5 inch is to small but 27in is absolutly huge and expensive. I went the apple store and still cant decide.. I am mainly doing web design (so coding and a live preview and googling fixes and stuff all at once) as well as photoshop... what do others here think? any one here do web design? what size do you have?

Thanks guys:D:apple:

I used to own a 27" iMac but scaled down to a 21.5". Both displays are beautiful but out of the box, I would say the 27" is a vital upgrade to any profession that needs to view content side by side. As a web designer, you would definitely find the size helpful, having your code on one side and having the actual page preview beside it. The 27" has enough screen estate to do this. There's nothing wrong with the 21.5" too, but to get this effect you should invest in an external display.
 
Gotta have the 27".

I have Dreamweaver, Fireworks and Photoshop running, with an FTP client, Firefox, safari, Chrome and Opera open as well, the screen real estate is a big positive for me.

Don't forget the 16Gb of ram also ;)

Thanks guys that helps... Ill have coda, photshop google chrome and w3 stuff open so i guess 27in is better but even 21.5 is better then my 15 in laptop or i could get a macbook air with external monitor
 
Well I don't know what you guys want, but I'm hoping it's a computer. THAT HAS A CD/DVD/BLU-RAY DRIVE.
 
Even though I think Blu-ray is a decent format, I have my PS3 for watching movies so I'm not too amped up about the next iMac having Blu-ray. I think having an SSD in there would be a great performance boost and that's what I'm more excited about.
 
I would love to see an adjustable stand for the 27 in. I'm sure it's not going to happen. ( a 24 in. would be perfect) I'll probably end up buying the 21in. iMac when the new ones come out.
 
I hope not.. that would make Boot Camp (which is, sadly, sometimes necessary) rather difficult to set up.

What I wouldn't give for HDMI-in though...

Not at all. Just get an external Superdrive.

There is also a support article from Apple to install Windows 7 bootcamp on Macbook Airs and Minis.
 
Optical disc drive, begone!

Dumping the optical drive is, in my opinion, one of the biggest mistakes (for it's larger models). I do an organization called "TSA" where a lot of things that need to be turned in like Music Production, Video Production, etc., require DVDs. I also do things for my school, which requires CDs and DVDs. Plus, Blu-Ray is slowly becoming the industry standard (up to 50GB on a single-layered, and you can get up to 100+GB on a Multi-layered!!), as more and more people get HDTV and prices are lowering. I can understand the need of not having the optical drive in the Mini or the Air because the target audience is most likely not going to be using a lot of CDs/DVDs, and those models are about the compact, out of the way-ness (in the Mini) and ultraportable (in the Air), but dropping the Optical Drive from the iMac or lower end MacBook Pros is just a TERRIBLE TERRIBLE idea.
 
dropping the Optical Drive from the iMac or lower end MacBook Pros is just a TERRIBLE TERRIBLE idea.

This. When flash drives get big enough to hold 50% of my boot disk and cost <$3 each AND hold data for 100 years, then we can talk about dropping the optical drive.
 
Blu-Ray is slowly becoming the industry standard

I can assure you that this is not correct.
Industry standard = Flash memory and external HDD

If you still work with optical media and feel that you can't leave it, I'm afraid you'll have to evolve your workplace.

Optical medias are:
  • slow;
  • not reliable;
  • physically big;
  • extremely unpratical.

Flash memories and external HDDs are the opposite of those.
 
Dumping the optical drive is, in my opinion, one of the biggest mistakes (for it's larger models). I do an organization called "TSA" where a lot of things that need to be turned in like Music Production, Video Production, etc., require DVDs. I also do things for my school, which requires CDs and DVDs. Plus, Blu-Ray is slowly becoming the industry standard (up to 50GB on a single-layered, and you can get up to 100+GB on a Multi-layered!!), as more and more people get HDTV and prices are lowering. I can understand the need of not having the optical drive in the Mini or the Air because the target audience is most likely not going to be using a lot of CDs/DVDs, and those models are about the compact, out of the way-ness (in the Mini) and ultraportable (in the Air), but dropping the Optical Drive from the iMac or lower end MacBook Pros is just a TERRIBLE TERRIBLE idea.

Over dramatizations over and over and over again. Why are you people panicking so much? Your world of CDs and DVDs will NOT end.

http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC684ZM/A

MC684
 
Why do we want more clutter on the desk? It's a desktop; leave it in. My MBA doesn't have an optical drive for good reason. The iMac does not need to be thinner or lighter.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.