Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The whole idea of attributing pride to something like this only seeks to increase the the abundance of ideas such as no sex before marriage,

I am not a prude by no means but what is wrong with being proud of this? You make it sound like a bad thing that I and others have waited. It used to be that having your virginity meant something in life. I still adhere to it. If others wants sex with multiple partners I am not going to judge them or put them down. Nor will I high five them and slap them on the back.

To me sex is something that is beautiful between two people who love each other. I don't know how other people ( I know a few who) can sleep with someone they picked up in a bar that night. Prudish? Maybe I am after all. But it is still beautiful with the one that you love.:D
 
Sure- shape, size, color? You don't know me very well. I'll talk about anything. :) Perhaps this should be moved PRSI though.
I know what you're saying. I can talk about anything, too. But here I think the OP is just embarrassing himself.
 
Nope- that's me. I wish they'd update that page. There are more than just those three films out there.
Cool! :)

I am not a prude by no means but what is wrong with being proud of this?
Nothing.

To me sex is something that is beautiful between two people who love each other.
Yep.

I don't know how other people ( I know a few who) can sleep with someone they picked up in a bar that night. Prudish? Maybe I am after all. But it is still beautiful with the one that you love.:D
Different folks view virginity differently, that much is certain.

What I think is most important in this discussion, is that we all respect each other's opinion whether we agree or disagree with it.

In the FWIW category, I think our views on topics like this change as we go through life. I know it did for me, and I know it has for many friends of mine. Part of the aging process I guess. :)

The one thing or idea if you will that sticks out in my mind, is never fall for peer pressure. Always do what is right for you.
 
Don't be proud if you simply have not crossed the threshold yet.
...
And if you haven't yet you should.

So the real message here is be loose and immoral? Society - for some apparently unknown and curious reason - managed to survive and even flourish for thousands of years whilst maintaining a strong set of morals (and until only recently - last 50 years or so - it was the common vagrant classes that slept around so freely). Morals have only declined since the 20th century and more so than ever since the 60s. To move in with someone and sleep with people gratuitously would be frowned upon even 50 years ago - it was viewed as shameful and out-of-the-ordinary. I don't call the change in recent years as simply being more intellectually advanced, I call that a decline in self discipline and moral judgement.

The fact that one possesses strong enough will power to avoid casual sex doesn't make them a prude, doesn't make them any less 'good' a person. It simply means you've got a higher standard you live by. It means you have virtue, not a meaningless set of 'personal values.' ("I only sleep with 5 different people a week" isn't virtue. It personal values... there's a difference)

I am not a prude by no means but what is wrong with being proud of this? You make it sound like a bad thing that I and others have waited. It used to be that having your virginity meant something in life. I still adhere to it. If others wants sex with multiple partners I am not going to judge them or put them down. Nor will I high five them and slap them on the back.

To me sex is something that is beautiful between two people who love each other. I don't know how other people ( I know a few who) can sleep with someone they picked up in a bar that night. Prudish? Maybe I am after all. But it is still beautiful with the one that you love.:D
Well said.
 
I lost my virginity at 175.

Pounds, that is. I had been obese from childhood, and it wasn't until I had lost weight and I was 175 pounds that I lost my virginity in any way. I was also 18 years old, but I think that is less significant in my story.
 
So the real message here is be loose and immoral? Society - for some apparently unknown and curious reason - managed to survive and even flourish for thousands of years whilst maintaining a strong set of morals (and until only recently - last 50 years or so - it was the common vagrant classes that slept around so freely). Morals have only declined since the 20th century and more so than ever since the 60s. To move in with someone and sleep with people gratuitously would be frowned upon even 50 years ago - it was viewed as shameful and out-of-the-ordinary. I don't call the change in recent years as simply being more intellectually advanced, I call that a decline in self discipline and moral judgement.

The fact that one possesses strong enough will power to avoid casual sex doesn't make them a prude, doesn't make them any less 'good' a person. It simply means you've got a higher standard you live by. It means you have virture, not a meaningless set of 'personal values.'

Good post. It used to be we listened to and respected what our parents said. Now we just do what we want and **** 'em. Is society better or worse for it? That's the question all adults, especially parents, need to ask themselves.
 
I am not a prude by no means but what is wrong with being proud of this?


Be proud of it all you want, but keep in mind the idea of waiting until marriage is a highly unrealistic goal, nor it it always the healthiest decision to make both for yourself and for your eventual partner(s). How long have humans been having sex compared to how long has marriage as we know it been around? This whole notion of one man one woman marriage is very very recent, as is the idea of no sex before it. Most researchers who study human sexuality argue that the aforementioned pairing is one of the most recent, unproven and often problematic forms of sexuality that has occurred in human history.


You make it sound like a bad thing that I and others have waited.

Have not.

It used to be that having your virginity meant something in life.


You're right, it meant being a virgin.


To me sex is something that is beautiful between two people who love each other.

It is. Its also so much more than that.

I don't know how other people ( I know a few who) can sleep with someone they picked up in a bar that night.


Because its fun?


But it is still beautiful with the one that you love.:D

That's one form of beauty for certain, however it is far from the only one.
 
I lost my virginity at 175.

Pounds, that is. I had been obese from childhood, and it wasn't until I had lost weight and I was 175 pounds that I lost my virginity in any way. I was also 18 years old, but I think that is less significant in my story.
Now that is a different way of looking at it. :)
 
The fact that one possesses strong enough will power to avoid casual sex doesn't make them a prude, doesn't make them any less 'good' a person. It simply means you've got a higher standard you live by. It means you have virtue, not a meaningless set of 'personal values.' ("I only sleep with 5 different people a week" isn't virtue. It personal values... there's a difference)

And having sex before marriage, before your 25 or before you're financially able to support a child does not make one a terrible person either.

How can what one values be eliminated by having sex. I haven't had sex, but if did, do I somehow no longer love my mother, or respect other humans? When do I lose my values? Right at the start? Half-way through? Upon "completion"? Virginity is an absurd value. I don't think anyone in this thread is promoting promiscuity.

That said, if you value your virginity, great for you. If you've had sex, great for you. But who is anyone to tell another how to live his or her life?

** Sorry, I alternate when writing between use of male and female pronouns (only one per piece of course :p). My English teachers have always hated it too... but I don't really like "gender inclusive" writing. **
 
My son waited until he thought he was in love then he actually told me.
I always was open about sex with my kids. Maybe that helped them.

My mum couldn't believe I still was a virgin. Then again AFAIK she waited till she was married too and has never cheated. Must run in the family this kinda thing. Prior to our chat (when she found out) we never discussed anything related to it.
Btw I'm not prude or anything. Me and my girlfriend get up to some... stuff. Just not full stuff. (no devil smiley)
 
So the real message here is be loose and immoral? Society - for some apparently unknown and curious reason - managed to survive and even flourish for thousands of years whilst maintaining a strong set of morals (and until only recently - last 50 years or so - it was the common vagrant classes that slept around so freely). Morals have only declined since the 20th century and more so than ever since the 60s. To move in with someone and sleep with people gratuitously would be frowned upon even 50 years ago - it was viewed as shameful and out-of-the-ordinary.

Your lack of historical perspective is staggering.

The fact that one possesses strong enough will power to avoid casual sex doesn't make them a prude, doesn't make them any less 'good' a person. It simply means you've got a higher standard you live by. It means you have virtue, not a meaningless set of 'personal values.' ("I only sleep with 5 different people a week" isn't virtue. It personal values... there's a difference)

And just because someone has different values than you do doesn't mean they've got lesser standards or virtue.
 
So the real message here is be loose and immoral? Society - for some apparently unknown and curious reason - managed to survive and even flourish for thousands of years whilst maintaining a strong set of morals (and until only recently - last 50 years or so - it was the common vagrant classes that slept around so freely). Morals have only declined since the 20th century and more so than ever since the 60s. To move in with someone and sleep with people gratuitously would be frowned upon even 50 years ago - it was viewed as shameful and out-of-the-ordinary. I don't call the change in recent years as simply being more intellectually advanced, I call that a decline in self discipline and moral judgement.

The fact that one possesses strong enough will power to avoid casual sex doesn't make them a prude, doesn't make them any less 'good' a person. It simply means you've got a higher standard you live by. It means you have virtue, not a meaningless set of 'personal values.' ("I only sleep with 5 different people a week" isn't virtue. It personal values... there's a difference)


Why on earth should anyone be proud of a strategy that will inevitably lead to a higher level of dissatisfaction in life? Sexual compatibility isn't a guaranteed thing. How would you feel if upon your wedding night you realise that neither of you does anything for the other? It simply makes sense to test the waters, it doesn't make sex any less special to do so in fact I'm adamant that it makes it more so.

Everyone has their kinks, my sexual compatibility with my partner is a large reason why we're so besotted with each other. I've had relationships sour purely due to sexual incompatibility and it's not fun to deal with the fallout.
 
The only thing more annoying than a virgin is a politically-correct virgin. :rolleyes:

Where did I say I was a virgin? If you read back and find my post I'll of said I'm not one and I wished I wasn't drunk at the time:(.
 
Nothing better than a Monday morning argument about sex while I stay at home with various electrodes stuck to my abdomen. Fun fun.


So the real message here is be loose and immoral?


Um, what? Did you just define my own sexual morals for me? Who are you to decide what is considered proper, or right or moral? I'm going off of the range of human existence here, not within the last few hundred years of one simple and accepted form of sexuality. And what exactly is wrong with being loose? Wouldn't it enable the baby (the eventual goal I assume) to come out easier?



Society - for some apparently unknown and curious reason - managed to survive and even flourish for thousands of years whilst maintaining a strong set of morals (and until only recently - last 50 years or so - it was the common vagrant classes that slept around so freely).

Are you serious? You really think that society has had the same morals we did from 50-60 years ago back to the beginnings of civilisation? What planet do you live on? For one, not all society is Western in mentality and origin, and second, humanity itself has gone through many phases in what it considers proper sexuality even within the same sects of culture. Our culture if based off of the Greeks and Romans right? I'll bet you things were a bit different back then.



Morals have only declined since the 20th century and more so than ever since the 60s. To move in with someone and sleep with people gratuitously would be frowned upon even 50 years ago - it was viewed as shameful and out-of-the-ordinary. I don't call the change in recent years as simply being more intellectually advanced, I call that a decline in self discipline and moral judgement.

Blah blah, the 50s were the greatest decade ever, blah blah, white picket fences...blah...everything "immoral" or even questionably so pushed under the rug and not dealt with or discussed, blah.


The fact that one possesses strong enough will power to avoid casual sex doesn't make them a prude, doesn't make them any less 'good' a person. It simply means you've got a higher standard you live by.


Again, you're creating a standards hierarchy where none exists. The only ones which do are personal ones among each individual. What exactly makes you think that someone who avoids casual sex has higher standards than others which don't? Not everyone who has casual sex does it in a dark alley behind a bar with no protection. Your idea that this sort of standard exists contributes to your idea that people who avoid casual sex are "less good", which is quite simply wrong.


It means you have virtue, not a meaningless set of 'personal values.' ("I only sleep with 5 different people a week" isn't virtue. It personal values... there's a difference)

Who cares about virtue? Seriously, does anyone really give a ****? That's a concept which originated out of the dark ages for ****s sake. The same people who value virtue in regards to virginity are the same people who like to sweep every other form of sexuality beyond vanilla heterosexual sex within marriage (or at least people who are engaged). They wonder why modern day morals have seemed to waste away, its because their definition of a proper sexuality was simply wrong! When you ignore and/or demoralise every other form of sexuality except for one specific kind, you're going to have problems. People are going to be afraid to talk about it. People are going to to start becoming ashamed about things they have no reason to be. People are not going to feel that its their choice what kind of sexuality they end up embracing as they mature. You want to talk about personal values? My personal values are as such; to explore my sexuality to the extent of my emotional and physical limits until I perish. You want to call that immoral or lacking in virtue...well, you're wrong.



Good post. It used to be we listened to and respected what our parents said. Now we just do what we want and **** 'em. Is society better or worse for it? That's the question all adults, especially parents, need to ask themselves.


Yes, because all of our parents talked to us openly about sex. If you can find a way to listen to collective silence then I shall award you a patent in doing so.
 
Why on earth should anyone be proud of a strategy that will inevitably lead to a higher level of dissatisfaction in life? Sexual compatibility isn't a guaranteed thing. How would you feel if upon your wedding night you realise that neither of you does anything for the other? It simply makes sense to test the waters, it doesn't make sex any less special to do so in fact I'm adamant that it makes it more so.

Everyone has their kinks, my sexual compatibility with my partner is a large reason why we're so besotted with each other. I've had relationships sour purely due to sexual incompatibility and it's not fun to deal with the fallout.

Don't forget you're talking to a US audience here. Ideas about sex are quite varied.

Remember, show a breast being caressed and the movie is rated X, show it being cut off and it's rated R. We have some seriously messed up values here.
 
Yeah, that's kinda not going to last, you know...
The unfortunate truth it seems.

My wife is the first person that I have been with in my life, that I don't care if we have sex or not. That is not to say, we don't have sex or that it is not fun. We do, it's fun, and we both enjoy it. :D

But there are so many other things about her that enchant and make me want to be with her, that sex is like the having desert with a cherry on top. Don't need the cherry to enjoy the desert, but it's nice to have.

Many years ago, I would have never dreamed that I would have this perspective when some older friends alluded to it. Now I see what they meant.

I hope this makes sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.