Yeah, but when you're in Northern Iowa how much wifi coverage do you have?Verizon's coverage is great, for sure - as a frequent flier, that's exactly why I use them - but in northern Iowa, there are many places where coverage is virtually nonexistent and this feature would come in handy. Not everyone lives in a metro.
I get that. I've frequented Arkansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, etc. I'm just curious how this would help someone. VZW's LTE is nearly ubiquitous, but in what situation would one NOT have LTE, but actually HAVE wifi?Verizon's coverage is great, for sure - as a frequent flier, that's exactly why I use them - but in northern Iowa, there are many places where coverage is virtually nonexistent and this feature would come in handy. Not everyone lives in a metro.
Yeah, but when you're in Northern Iowa how much wifi coverage do you have?
Gotchya. That makes sense. I guess if someone worked Ina congested metro or basement it would be beneficial as well. Can't help but wonder if these situations are common place enough to motivate Big Red to roll out such measures. Time will tell.I live between two towns. The first has LTE from VZW no problem, the other I vary between 1x and no service. My gym is in the latter and offers free wifi. That is just one example to bow it would be useful in my daily usage.
Gotchya. That makes sense. I guess if someone worked Ina congested metro or basement it would be beneficial as well. Can't help but wonder if these situations are common place enough to motivate Big Red to roll out such measures. Time will tell.
I can see the large buildings argument, as I work on the 25th floor of a building, but rural area's w/ zero towers nearby probably has low throughput internet services so I would think you'd still experience issues w/ stability.
I'd consider ditching the Microcell if I had WiFi calling.I've never needed it. Have you? In what situation do you have wifi but not VZW cellular connection?